种植体参照法在曲面体层片后牙区测量中的应用及误差分析

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To provide an implant reference method in measurement of posterior teeth region in the panoramic radiograph, and analyze the measurement error. Materials and Methods: From January 2017 to January 2018, panoramic radiographs of patients who received Osstem implant restoration treatments were collected at the Department of Implantology of Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology of Nanjing Medical University. The sizes of dental implants and cover screws were recorded in advance. The heights and diameters of the cover screws were calculated using the implant reference method. The calculated values were compared with the actual values to analyze the errors of this method. Results: Totally 93 panoramic radiographs from 54 patients were included in this study. The data sample accorded with normal distribution and there were no significant differences between the calculated values and actual values. Both vertical and horizontal absolute errors of measurements of posterior teeth regions in the panoramic radiographs using the implant reference method were less than 0.1mm. Conclusions: The implant reference method is applicable to the local measurement of the posterior region in the panoramic radiograph, and the measurement accuracy is relatively high.

Key words: Panoramic radiograph, Implant, Reference, Measurement, Error analysis

CLC Number:

R816.98

Shui-Yi Shao. Application and error analysis of implant reference method in measurement of posterior teeth region in the panoramic radiograph[J]. , 2019, 39(3): 214-217.

References

[1] Chugh NK, Bhattacharyya J, Das S, et al. Use of digital panoramic radiology in presurgical implant treatment planning to accurately assess bone density[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116(2): 200-205.
[2] Ladeira DB, Cruz AD, Almeida SM, et al. Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2012, 41(5): 417-421.
[3] EI Hage M, Bernard JP, Combescure C, et al. Impact of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy[J]. Int J Dent, 2015, 2015: 452413.
[4] Dagassanberndt DC, Zitzmann NU, Walter C, et al. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(8):1010-1016.
[5] Dau M, Edalatpour A, Schulze R, et al. Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography - influence of medical education[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2017, 46(2):20160081.
[6] 戴琳璐, 张志愿, 王绍义. 下颌骨数字曲面体层片的曲变研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(4): 310-313.
[7] Puricelli E. Panorametry: suggestion of a method for mandibular measurements on panoramic radiographs[J]. Head Face Med, 2009, 5: 19.
[8] Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Abolvardi M, et al. Comparison of dental panoramic radiography and CBCT for measuring vertical bone height in different horizontal locations of posterior mandibular alveolar process[J]. J Dent (Shiraz), 2018, 19(2): 83-91.
[9] 马绪臣. 口腔颌面医学影像诊断学[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[10] Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P, Drummond S, et al. Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study[J]. Quintessence Int, 2006, 37(3): 191-197.
[11] Imada TS, Fernandes LM, Centurion BS, et al. Accessory mental foramina: prevalence, position and diameter assessed by cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiographs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 25(2): 94-99.
[12] 赵旭, 邸萍, 林野,等. “All-on-4”无牙颌种植即刻修复技术的初步临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(5): 720-726.
[13] Apostu D, Lucaciu O, Lucaciu GD, et al. Systemic drugs that influence titanium implant osseointegration[J]. Drug Metab Rev, 2017, 49(1): 92-104.
[14] Hu KF, Lin YC, Ho KY, et al. Compliance with Supportive Periodontal Treatment in Patients with Dental Implants[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(6): 1364-1370.
[15] Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, et al. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 25: 690-695.

Application and error analysis of implant reference method in measurement of posterior teeth region in the panoramic radiograph

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Research progress of the effects of hyperlipidemia on osseointegration of titanium implants [J]. , 2019, 39(6): 557-560.
[2]	. Clinical application progress of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing of milled framework in implant fixed restorations for edentulous patients [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 455-458.
[3]	. Research progress of improving the success rate of planting for diabetic patients [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 459-463.
[4]	. The effect of clenched bruxism on the stress distribution of peri-implant bone with distal free-end edentulism: A three-dimensional finite element study [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 409-413.
[5]	. Reflection and summary of postoperative complications of implant-supported fixed restoration in edentulous patients [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 385-389.
[6]	. Contrastive study on alveolar ridge preservation: Tooth extraction through dentoalveolar distraction [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 207-209.
[7]	. Clinical application and experience of modified internal sinus floor elevation and dental implant in maxilary molar area [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 223-227.
[8]	. Clinical comparative study of PRP combined with allograft bone powder and autogenous iliac bone graft in the treatment of maxillofacial bone defect [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 218-222.
[9]	. Neither open flap debridement nor bone grafting when “saucer-like” marginal bone loss amounts to 3 mm below the implant shoulder after 1-year functional loading [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 164-166.
[10]	. Flap surgery is required when “saucer-like” marginal bone loss amounted to 3 mm below implant shoulder after 1-year loading [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 161-163.
[11]	. Comparison of two different methods for evaluation of alveolar bone angular absorption [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 117-120.
[12]	. Study on the maximum width of the micro slit based on the microsphere diffusion method [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 6-9.
[13]	. Advantages of long-term stability of guided bone regeneration augmentation for alveolar bone reconstruction compared with autogenous bone graft [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 60-62.
[14]	. Progress research on application of platelet-rich fibrin in dental implantology [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 71-76.
[15]	. Research progress of animal models of peri-implantitis [J]. , 2018, 38(8): 747-751.