国产ZDI种植体的长期临床效果分析

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To observe and assess the longterm clinical effect of domestic ZDI implant system. Methods 35 patients with totally 46 implants were recruited in this study. The longterm clinical effect of ZDI implant system was analyzed by observing the incidence of biological and mechanical complications, measuring the extent of implant bone loss and scoring the patients degree of satisfaction. Results After six years followup, only two cases occurred periimplantitis, one case of crown loss and none of other mechanical complications. Eventually, the success rate was 95.7%, the survival rate was 100%, and the overall satisfaction index was 9.79±0.29. Conclusion The ZDI implant system can achieve a good longterm clinical outcome as long as the operation is standardly performed, the restoration is accurately performed and the oral hygiene is continuously maintained.

Key words: implant, implant restoration, clinical effect

CLC Number:

R782.1

References 21

[1]	林野.我国口腔种植学的发展现状和思考[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2007, 42(17):641-645
[2]	谢文高.当代口腔种植学的进展及其临床意义[J].基层医学论坛; 2015, 19(7 ), 981-982.
[3]	杨建新, 徐亮, 钱蕴珠, 等, 种植区牙槽骨密度的螺旋CT测量研究[J]., 中国口腔种植学杂志; 20, 15(04), 171-173.
[4]	Al-Ekrish AA, Widmann G, Alfadda SA.Revised,computed tomography-based Lekholm and Zarb jawbone quality classification[J].Int J Prosthodont, 2018, 31(4):342-345
[5]	Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al.Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implantsPart 1:8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 1997, 8(3):161-172
[6]	Rosenblum MA, Schulman A.A review of all-ceramic restorations[J].J Am Dent Assoc, 1997, 128(3):297-307
[7]	郑新乐, 郭海山, 李英.国产种植体在个别牙缺失的临床应用[J].口腔医学, 2003, 23(1):37-38
[8]	黄建生，周磊，宋光保.种植系统临床应用评价[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2006, 24(6):59-560
[9]	王广, 任道普, 何露, 等.例枚国产种植体口腔种植义齿修复病例统计分析[J].中国口腔种植学杂志, 2018, 23(3):142-146
[10]	Graetz C, El-Sayed KF, Geiken A, et al.Effect of periodontitis history on implant success: a long-term evaluation during supportive periodontal therapy in a university setting[J].Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(1):235-244
[11]	Rammelsberg P, Lorenzo-Bermejo J, Kappel S.Effect of prosthetic storation on implant survival and success[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(10):1296-1302
[12]	Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, et al.A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 6):22-38
[13]	Stoichkov B, Kirov D.Analysis of the causes of dental implant fracture: A retrospective clinical study[J].Quintessence Int, 2018, 49(4):279-286
[14]	Schmidt A, H?ussling T, Rehmann P, et al.Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study[J].J Prosthodont Res, 2018, 62(2):245-251
[15]	Kutkut A, Abu-Eid R, Sharab L, et al.Full mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of a patient with ectodermal dysplasia: Clinical report and literature review[J].J Int Acad Periodontol, 2015, 17(2):34-41
[16]	Lee CT, Huang YW, Zhu L, et al.Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Dent, 2017, 62:1-12.
[17]	Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF.Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: aliterature review[J].J Prosthet Dent, 2005, 94(4):377-381
[18]	Petrie CS, Williams JL.Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, andtaper on strains in the alveolar crest [J].Clin Oral Implant Res, 2005, 16:486-494.
[19]	Akram Z, Javed F, Vohra F.Effect of waterpipe smoking on peri-implant health: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Investig Clin Dent. 2019, 4:e12403.
[20]	Korsch M, Marten SM, D?tsch A, et al.Effect of dental cements on peri-implant microbial community: comparison of the microbial communities inhabiting the peri-implant tissue when using different luting cements[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(12):e161-e166
[21]	De Kok IJ, Duqum IS, Katz LH, et al.Management of implantprosthodontic complications[J].Dent Clin North Am, 2019, 63(2):217-231

A long-term clinical effect analysis of domestic ZDI implants

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 21

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. keratinized mucosa; peri-implant diseases; dental plaque; soft tissue augmentation [J]. , 2019, 39(9): 827-830.
[2]	. Research progress of the effect of initial mucosal thickness on implant marginal bone loss [J]. , 2019, 39(8): 744-747.
[3]	. Research progress of the effects of hyperlipidemia on osseointegration of titanium implants [J]. , 2019, 39(6): 557-560.
[4]	. Clinical application progress of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing of milled framework in implant fixed restorations for edentulous patients [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 455-458.
[5]	. Research progress of improving the success rate of planting for diabetic patients [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 459-463.
[6]	. The effect of clenched bruxism on the stress distribution of peri-implant bone with distal free-end edentulism: A three-dimensional finite element study [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 409-413.
[7]	. Reflection and summary of postoperative complications of implant-supported fixed restoration in edentulous patients [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 385-389.
[8]	Shui-Yi Shao. Application and error analysis of implant reference method in measurement of posterior teeth region in the panoramic radiograph [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 214-217.
[9]	. Clinical application and experience of modified internal sinus floor elevation and dental implant in maxilary molar area [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 223-227.
[10]	. Clinical comparative study of PRP combined with allograft bone powder and autogenous iliac bone graft in the treatment of maxillofacial bone defect [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 218-222.
[11]	. Contrastive study on alveolar ridge preservation: Tooth extraction through dentoalveolar distraction [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 207-209.
[12]	. Neither open flap debridement nor bone grafting when “saucer-like” marginal bone loss amounts to 3 mm below the implant shoulder after 1-year functional loading [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 164-166.
[13]	. Flap surgery is required when “saucer-like” marginal bone loss amounted to 3 mm below implant shoulder after 1-year loading [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 161-163.
[14]	. Considerations about the timing of complete-arch implant rehabilitation for the patients with severe periodontitis [J]. , 2019, 39(10): 941-943.
[15]	. Advantages of long-term stability of guided bone regeneration augmentation for alveolar bone reconstruction compared with autogenous bone graft [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 60-62.