口腔医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 1070-1075.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2023.12.003

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同湿度及酸蚀对2种通用型粘接剂粘接强度的影响

陈勇1,2,3,王跃岩3,张光东1,2,4()   

  1. 1 南京医科大学江苏省口腔疾病重点实验室,江苏南京(210029)
    2 南京医科大学江苏省口腔医学转化研究中心,江苏南京(210029)
    3 无锡口腔医院牙体牙髓病科,江苏无锡(214000)
    4 南京医科大学附属口腔医院综合科,江苏南京(210029)
  • 修回日期:2023-07-17 出版日期:2023-12-28 发布日期:2023-12-28
  • 通讯作者: 张光东 E-mail:egd_zhang@njmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科教能力提升工程——江苏省研究型医院(YJXYYJSDW4);江苏省医学创新中心(CXZX202227)

Comparative study on the bonding strength between two universal adhesives and resin under different humidity and acid etching conditions

CHEN Yong1,2,3,WANG Yueyan3,ZHANG Guangdong1,2,4()   

  1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029,China
  • Revised:2023-07-17 Online:2023-12-28 Published:2023-12-28
  • Contact: ZHANG Guangdong E-mail:egd_zhang@njmu.edu.cn

摘要:

目的 研究牙本质表面不同湿润度及酸蚀对2种通用型粘接剂——Single Bond Universal(SBU)、Prime Bond Universal(PBU)粘接强度的影响。方法 选取60颗人新鲜无龋磨牙,随机均分为6组,制备出一个矩形的平坦、光滑的牙本质粘接面,每个粘接面被均分为两部分,一侧进行酸蚀处理,另一侧不进行酸蚀处理,利用蒸馏水移液器制备出干燥、湿润和过湿的牙本质表面,分别用SBU和PBU进行粘接。树脂固化后垂直于牙本质表面切割出1 mm×1 mm的柱形小棒,在万能测试仪上测试其微剪切粘接强度;采用体视显微镜观察界面断裂模式,并在扫描电子显微镜下观察各组树脂-牙本质粘接界面形态。每两组间采用独立样本t检验进行统计学分析(P<0.05)。结果 ①酸蚀模式、粘接剂、湿润度三种因素均有统计学意义。②在酸蚀组,无论是SBU还是PBU,3种湿度牙本质表面的粘接强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在未酸蚀组,SBU在干燥牙本质表面的粘接强度明显低于在湿润和过湿牙本质表面的粘接强度,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),PBU在未酸蚀的3种不同湿度牙本质表面的粘接强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③SBU酸蚀各组比对应的未酸蚀各组能获得更高的粘接强度,但在湿润和过湿条件下,酸蚀与否差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);PBU酸蚀各组比对应的未酸蚀各组能获得更高的粘接强度,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。④SBU与PBU相比,同等实验条件下能获得更高的粘接强度,但在酸蚀后的湿润、过湿牙本质表面,SBU和PBU粘接强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑤断裂模式均以界面断裂为主,无显著性差异。⑥扫描电镜观察结果显示:两种粘接剂在酸蚀条件下形成的树脂突更密集、更长,并且有树脂突伸入牙本质小管中。未酸蚀条件下,两种粘接剂形成的树脂突均较稀疏和短小,SBU比PBU形成的树脂突相对较多。结论 ①SBU应用于酸蚀后的牙本质表面对水分的敏感性较低,PBU应用于酸蚀或未酸蚀的牙本质表面对水分的敏感性均较低;②SBU和PBU应用于酸蚀后的牙本质表面比未酸蚀的牙本质表面能获得更高的粘接强度。

关键词: 通用型粘接剂, 牙本质湿度, 微剪切强度, 酸蚀

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effects of dentine surface wetting and acid etching on the bonding strength of two kinds of Universal adhesives(Single Bond Universal(SBU) and Prime Bond Universal(PBU)). Methods Sixty human fresh caries-free molars were randomly divided into 6 groups to prepare a rectangular flat and smooth dentin adhesive surface. Each adhesive surface was divided into two parts. One side was treated with acid etching, and the other side was not. Dry, wet and overwet dentin surfaces were prepared by distilled water pipetter. SBU and PBU were used for bonding respectively. After filling, 1 mm×1 mm cylindrical rods were cut perpendicular to the dentin surface, and their micro-shear bonding strength was tested on a universal tester. The morphology of resin-dentin bonding interface was observed under scanning electron microscope. Independent sample T-test was used for statistical analysis between each two groups(P<0.05). Results ①There were statistically significant differences in the three factors of etching mode, adhesive and wetness.②In the acid etching group, there was no significant difference in bonding strength between the three moisture dentine surfaces, no matter SBU or PBU (P>0.05). In the non-acid etching group, the bonding strength of SBU on dry dentin surfaces was significantly lower than that on wet and overwet dentin surfaces, with statistical significance (P<0.05), while the bonding strength of PBU on three different moisture dentin surfaces without acid etching was not statistically significant (P>0.05). ③The bonding strength of SBU acid-etched groups was higher than that of the corresponding non-etched groups, but there was no statistical significance in wet and overwet conditions (P>0.05). The bonding strength of PBU acid etching group was higher than that of the corresponding non-acid etching group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ④Compared with PBU, SBU could obtain higher bonding strength under the same experimental conditions, but there was no statistically significant difference in bonding strength between SBU and PBU on wet and overwet dentin surfaces after acid etching (P>0.05). ⑤The fracture modes were mainly interfacial fracture, and there was no significant difference.⑥Scanning electron microscope (SEM) showed that the resin protrusion formed by the two adhesives under the condition of acid etching was more dense and longer, and the resin protrusion extended into the dentin tubule. Under the condition of no acid etching, the resin protrusions formed by the two adhesives were sparse and short, and the resin protrusions formed by SBU were relatively more than those by PBU. Conclusion ①SBU applied to dentine surface after acid etching has low sensitivity to water, and PBU applied to dentine surface after acid etching or without acid etching has low sensitivity to water. ②SBU and PBU applied on the dentin surface after acid etching can obtain higher bonding strength than that on the dentin surface without acid etching.

Key words: universal adhesive, dentine moisture, micro-tensile strength, aid etching

中图分类号: