两种覆盖全口义齿修复效果的临床研究

›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 536-538.

两种覆盖全口义齿修复效果的临床研究

陈正国¹,许少平²,谷芳¹

1. 江苏省泰州市中医院
2. 泰州职业技术学院

收稿日期:2012-03-28 修回日期:2012-04-16 出版日期:2012-09-28 发布日期:2013-02-05
通讯作者: 陈正国 E-mail:tzchenyisheng@sina.com

Clinical research on two processes of full denture remediation effectiveness

Received:2012-03-28 Revised:2012-04-16 Online:2012-09-28 Published:2013-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [摘要] 目的比较传统覆盖全口义齿和磁性附着体覆盖全口义齿修复效果。方法选择2008年5月至2010年10月在本院口腔科需做覆盖全口义齿修复的17例患者，每例患者均戴用传统覆盖全口义齿3个月后再改戴用磁性附着体覆盖全口义齿。分别在戴用两种覆盖全口义齿3个月时采用问卷的形式了解患者的满意度和采用称重法测量咀嚼效率。结果患者戴用磁性附着体覆盖全口义齿3个月的满意度和咀嚼效率明显高于戴用传统覆盖全口义齿（P<0.05）。结论患者戴用磁性附着体覆盖全口义齿在固位稳定和舒适程度及咀嚼效率方面明显优于传统覆盖全口义齿。

关键词: 关键词：磁性附着体, 覆盖义齿, 满意度, 咀嚼效率, Key words: magnetic attachment, full denture, degree of satisfaction , masticatory efficiency

Abstract: Abstract: Objective Compare remediation effectiveness of traditional full denture with that of magnetic attachment full denture. Method From May, 2008 to October, 2010, 17 patients seeking for full denture remediation in Taizhou Hospital of Chinese medicine were chosen to wear traditional full denture for three months and then to wear magnetic attachment full denture for three months. Investigate the patients’ satisfaction by questionnaire survey and detect the masticatory efficiency with weighing method 3 months after treatment. Result The patients were more satisfied and have higher masticatory efficiency with magnetic attachment full denture compared with traditional full denture. Conclusion Magnetic attachment full denture is obviously better than traditional full denture in terms of fixity, comfortableness and masticatory efficiency.

中图分类号:

R783.4

陈正国许少平谷芳. 两种覆盖全口义齿修复效果的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2012, 32(9): 536-538.

[1]	张春辉林晓萍靳赢郭建茹查建鑫董娜. 富血小板纤维蛋白辅助治疗牙龈退缩的临床效果及患者满意度评价[J]. , 2021, 41(7): 614-617.
[2]	王帅冯靳秋. 两种修复方式对乳磨牙大面积缺损咀嚼效率影响的临床研究[J]. , 2019, 39(10): 928-930.
[3]	钟志华唐祎施斌. 掌跖角化牙周破坏综合征患者的磁性附着体修复[J]. , 2018, 38(7): 624-627.
[4]	傅振汤春波. 种植体直径对下颌覆盖义齿植体边缘骨吸收影响的3年回顾性研究[J]. , 2018, 38(10): 903-907.
[5]	武红艳王仁飞朱琰顾亚军. Locator附着体和球帽附着体在种植覆盖义齿中的临床修复效果比较[J]. , 2016, 36(2): 162-165.
[6]	张仁国张太梅解永富顾静怡施晓玲. 球帽固位下颌双种植体覆盖义齿修复效果的前瞻性研究[J]. , 2015, 35(8): 666-669.
[7]	蔡岫颖邵玶安钢辉曲晓冬. 成人正畸治疗后满意度评估及相关心理因素分析[J]. , 2015, 35(8): 649-653.
[8]	沈晴昳李国强. 舌向集中与半解剖式全口义齿的满意度及咀嚼效能比较[J]. , 2015, 35(2): 124-127.
[9]	胡凤玲龚逸眀张建国余优成. 种植磁性覆盖义齿的三维有限元模型的建立[J]. , 2015, 35(12): 1025-1027.
[10]	龚正伟王伊娜黎红. 杭州口腔专科患者满意度调查研究[J]. , 2015, 35(11): 967-971.
[11]	王燕刘文宋玲张春艳王明臻. 栓体栓道式精密附着体义齿修复双侧后牙游离缺失的临床应用研究[J]. , 2014, 34(10): 778-780.
[12]	姚勤李琥. Vitallium 2000与纯钛铸造支架义齿的临床应用效果比较[J]. , 2013, 33(12): 863-864.
[13]	朱亚君. 磁性附着体在全口覆盖义齿中的临床应用与效果评价[J]. , 2013, 33(11): 789-791.
[14]	程春,张红. 口腔科护士在新疆多民族地区构建和谐医护患关系的作用探讨[J]. , 2012, 32(9): 544-545.
[15]	陈正国,许少平,谷芳. 两种覆盖全口义齿修复效果的临床研究[J]. , 2012, 32(9): 541-543.