›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 916-921.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

上颌腭部骨支持式前方牵引配合扩弓的三维有限元分析

李祥1,杨婉琪2,李慧2,于晓艺2,葛悦1,朱宪春2   

  1. 1. 吉林大学口腔医院
    2. 吉林大学口腔医学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-20 修回日期:2020-04-09 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2020-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 朱宪春 E-mail:15344310555@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上颌骨骨性扩弓配合前方牵引治疗骨性Ⅲ类错HE畸形的三维有限元和临床研究

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of maxillary palate skeletal protraction combined with expansion

  • Received:2020-02-20 Revised:2020-04-09 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2020-10-28

摘要: [摘要]目的 建立颅上颌复合体的模型, 分析上颌腭部骨支持式前方牵引配合扩弓时,前方牵引方向和牵引位点的不同对颅上颌复合体的影响。方法 应用逆向工程方法建立含3种上颌腭部骨支持式前方牵引(L1、L2、L3)配合扩弓的三维有限元模型,在进行腭部扩展的同时,装置的两侧牵引钩处施加500 g力,方向分别与上颌牙合平面呈0°、15°、30°、45°,分析颅上颌复合体应力分布及位移趋势。结果 相同的牵引角度时,L1、L2、L3三组的N点(鼻根点)、IOB点(眶下缘点)、A点(上牙槽座点)在三维方向的位移无统计学差异;L1、L2、L3组同一骨缝产生的应力值不同;随着牵引角度的增加,N点、IOB点、A点在Z向的位移值呈线性减小;同一牵引力在各骨缝产生的应力大小不同,随着牵引角度的增加各骨缝的应力变化也不相同。结论 ①上颌腭部骨支持式前方牵引配合扩弓时,3种装置对颅上颌复合体的位移趋势的影响无明显差异,均可使颅上颌复合体发生向前移位伴有逆时针旋转,但L2型对同一骨缝产生的应力相对较小,随着牵引角度的增加颅上颌复合体逆时针旋转减小,各骨缝的应力发生不同的变化。②临床在应用腭部骨支持式装置进行前方牵引时,对于反覆牙合较深反覆盖较大的患者可以选择较小的牵引角度,相反,对于反覆牙合较浅反覆盖较小的患者可以选择较大的牵引角度。

关键词: 骨性扩弓, 前方牵引, 三维有限元

Abstract: Objective  Establish craniofacial model to analysis effects of different anterior traction directions and traction sites on the craniofacial complex during protraction combined with expansion. Methods  Three-dimensional finite element model with 3 types (L1, L2, L3) maxillary palate skeletal protraction assisted expansion using reverse engineering method. When the palate is extended, a force of 500g is applied to the traction hook of the device, and the directions are 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, and 45 ° with the maxillary occlusal plane. The stress distribution and displacement trend of the craniofacial complex are analyzed. Results  At the same traction angle, there is no statistical difference in the three-dimensional displacements of the three points of the N points (Nasion), IOB point (Infraorbital point), and A point (Subspinale) in L1, L2, and L3;L1, L2, and L3 groups have different stress values from the same bone suture;With the increase of the traction angle, the displacement values of the N, IOB, and A points in the Z direction decrease linearly;The same traction force produces different stresses in each bone suture, and the stress changes of each bone suture with the increase of the traction angle. Conclusions  When maxillary palate skeletal protraction combined with expansion,the three device forms have little effect on the displacement trend of the craniofacial, which can cause the craniofacial to move forward with counterclockwise rotation, but L2 Relatively low stress on the same bone gap, with the increase of the traction angle, the counterclockwise rotation of the craniofacial decreases, and the stress of each bone suture changes differently. In the clinical application of the zygomatic bone support device for forward traction, a smaller traction angle can be selected for patients with deeper occlusion and deeper coverage, on the contrary, for patients with shallow occlusion and shallower coverage Large traction angle.

Key words: Skeletal expansion, Maxillary protraction, Three-dimensional finite element

中图分类号: