髓腔固位冠抗折强度影响因素的研究进展

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.08.015

Abstract

Abstract: In recent years, with the concept of minimally invasive surgery gradually gaining popularity, endocrown has been favored by many doctors as a simple and fast repair method after root canal treatment, because it can retain more tooth tissues without excessively cutting healthy dentin. The strength of endocrown is very important to survival rate of teeth. Therefore, a series of experiments were conducted by scholars at home and abroad to study the fracture strength of endocrown. In this paper, factors influencing the fracture strength of endocrown were reviewed, including materials, preparation methods, length of the pulp chamber extension and thickness of the prosthesis crown, in order to provide some clinical reference for dental restoration after root canal treatment.

Key words: endocrown, fracture resistance, dental restoration, minimally invasive, root canal therapy

CLC Number:

R783.3

LIU Xiangling, WANG Qiuyue, ZHANG Lingbo. Research on influencing factors of fracture resistance of endocrown[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(8): 750-753.

References

[1] Kassis C, Khoury P, Mehanna CZ, et al. Effect of inlays, onlays and endocrown cavity design preparation on fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2021, 30(7):625-631.
[2] Helal MA, Wang ZG. Biomechanical assessment of restored mandibular molar by endocrown in comparison to a glass fiber post-retained conventional crown: 3D finite element analysis[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(9):988-996.
[3] Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM,et al. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases[J]. J Dent, 2017, 63: 1-7.
[4] Zhu JX, Wang DM, Rong QG,et al. Effect of central retainer shape and abduction angle during preparation of teeth on dentin and cement layer stress distributions in endocrown-restored mandibular molars[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(3):464-470.
[5] Turkistani AA, Dimashkieh M, Rayyan M. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with endocrowns: An in vitro study[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2020, 32(4):389-394.
[6] Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique[J]. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 1995, 7(5):83-94.
[7] Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years: Preliminary results[J]. J Adhes Dent, 1999, 1(3):255-265.
[8] Soleimani F, Jalali H, Mostafavi AS,et al. Retention and clinical performance of zirconia crowns: A comprehensive review[J]. Int J Dent, 2020, 2020: 8846534.
[9] Kumar NA, Sampathkumar J, Ramakrishnan H,et al. Comparative evaluation of wear resistance of CAD-CAM zirconia and cast cobalt chromium alloy for indirect restorations against human enamel-An in vitro study[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2020, 31(4):537-545.
[10] Mahmoodi N, Hooshmand T, Heidari S,et al. Effect of sandblasting, silica coating, and laser treatment on the microtensile bond strength of a dental zirconia ceramic to resin cements[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2016, 31(2):205-211.
[11] El Ghoul W, Özcan M, Silwadi M, et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019, 31(4):378-387.
[12] Taha D, Spintzyk S, Sabet A,et al. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018, 30(4):319-328.
[13] 张君侠, 陈怡丹, 程大光. 铸瓷髓腔固位冠修复大面积缺损磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2019, 20(2):75-76.
[14] Al-Dabbagh RA. Survival and success of endocrowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(3):415.e1-415415.e9.
[15] El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks[J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 40(2):201-210.
[16] Zheng ZT, He YY, Ruan WH,et al. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(6):890-899.
[17] Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Valente LL,et al. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: Effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2019, 33: e012.
[18] Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS,et al. Which materials would account for a better mechanical behavior for direct endocrown restorations?[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 103: 103592.
[19] 冯海兰, 徐军. 口腔修复学[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2013.
[20] Einhorn M, DuVall N, Wajdowicz M,et al. Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(1):e237-e242.
[21] Taha D, Spintzyk S, Schille C,et al. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2018, 62(3):293-297.
[22] 翟晓阳, 张静亚, 张三柯, 等. 两种边缘设计的髓腔固位冠修复不同缺损下颌第一磨牙的有限元分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(5):480-484.
[23] Zicari F,van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, et al. Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading[J]. J Dent, 2012, 40(4):312-321.
[24] Ghajghouj O, Taşar-Faruk S. Evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns with different intracoronal depths and restorative materials luted with various resin cements[J]. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(16):E2528.
[25] Rocca GT, Daher R, Saratti CM,et al. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns[J]. J Dent, 2018, 68: 41-50.
[26] Dartora NR, de Conto Ferreira MB, Moris ICM, et al. Effect of intracoronal depth of teeth restored with endocrowns on fracture resistance: In vitro and 3-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(7):1179-1185.
[27] Hayes A, Duvall N, Wajdowicz M,et al. Effect of endocrown pulp chamber extension depth on molar fracture resistance[J]. Oper Dent, 2017, 42(3):327-334.
[28] Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE,et al. Influence of adhesive core buildup designs on the resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns[J]. Oper Dent, 2016, 41(1):76-82.
[29] Tribst JP, Dal Piva AO, Madruga CF,et al. The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2019, 11(11):e969-e977.
[30] Shin Y, Park S, Park JW,et al. Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(1):109-115.
[31] Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L,et al. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2014, 41(11):853-874.
[32] Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, et al. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: A literature review[J]. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22(5):419-428.
[33] El Ghoul WA, Özcan M, Ounsi H,et al. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(1):128-134.[34] Meharry MR, Moazzami SM, Li Y. Comparison of enamel and dentin shear bond strengths of current dental bonding adhesives from three bond generations[J]. Oper Dent, 2013, 38(6):E237-E245.
[35] Rohr N, Fischer J. Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2017, 9(2):85-92.
[36] van Dijken JW,Hasselrot L, Ormin A, et al. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2001, 109(4):222-229.
[37] Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD,et al. Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparations[J]. Oper Dent, 1992, 17(1):13-20.
[38] van den Breemer CRG, Özcan M, Cune MS,et al. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017, 72: 102-109.
[39] 姜又升, 冯琳, 高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4):764-769.
[40] 冯娟, 郭慧慧, 申晋斌, 等. 磨牙髓室底垫底厚度对全瓷嵌体冠应力分布的影响[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2017, 27(1):16-21.

Research on influencing factors of fracture resistance of endocrown

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Clinical application of computer aided design and computer aided manufacture (CAD／CAM ) porcelain veneer in all ceramic esthetic restorations for anterior teeth [J]. , 2020, 40(4): 319-323.
[2]	. The effect of root canal treatment on the resistance of root with oval canals [J]. , 2019, 39(6): 561-564.
[3]	. Taurodontism Literature Review [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 464-467.
[4]	. Updated clinical application of ultra thin porcelain veneer [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 477-480.
[5]	. The fracture resistance of three-unit polyetheretherketone fixed bridge with different connection areas [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 210-213.
[6]	. A new treatment for condylar neck fracture with small incision reduction and internal fixation [J]. , 2019, 39(10): 907-911.
[7]	. Efficacy observation of Carisolv minimally invasive treatment of deep caries in primary deciduous molars [J]. , 2018, 38(8): 720-723.
[8]	. Pain after single-visit root canal treatment of acute pulpitis with two kinds of nickel-titanium mechanical preparation equipment systems based on different kinematics [J]. , 2018, 38(7): 612-615.
[9]	. Contrastive research of clinical effects of the minimally invasive surgery techniques combined with CBCT examination and traditional technologies on the extraction of embedded supernumerary teeth [J]. , 2018, 38(6): 543-547.
[10]	. The clinical research of the rotary nickeltitanium instruments and the ultrasonic root canal irrigation which were applied to the single-visit root canal therapy of the chronic apical periodontitis [J]. , 2018, 38(2): 162-165.
[11]	. Combined application of two kinds of surgical burs in minimally invasive tooth extraction [J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1114-1117.
[12]	. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth treated with different restored with three restorations [J]. , 2018, 38(11): 976-979.
[13]	. Influence of inner crown thickness on the bonding strength of porcelain fused to Co-Cr alloy endocrown [J]. , 2018, 38(10): 890-893.
[14]	. A retrospective research of the rapeutic effect of immediate implant and delayed implant following alveolar ridge preservation after minimally invasive extraction in anterior area [J]. , 2017, 37(4): 325-330.
[15]	. Effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction on dental-related quality of life in the elder patients [J]. , 2017, 37(3): 223-226.