口内扫描仪临床扫描精度及影响因素把控

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.09.001

Abstract

Abstract: In tooth defect restoration , the technology of obtaining digital impression through intraoral scanning is used more and more frequently in clinical practice because of its simple, comfortable and fast characteristics. The accuracy of digital impression (including trueness and precision) is the key to final success of restoration. The scanning accuracy is different because of different scanning principles of various intraoral scanning equipment. In addition, the scanning scheme adopted in clinical operation, preparation quality and oral environment will all affect scanning accuracy. Understanding the principle of intraoral scanning and relevant influencing factors of scanning accuracy, and taking corresponding coping strategies in clinical operation can improve scanning accuracy, and then eventually improve the success rate of digital restoration of tooth defects.

Key words: intraoral scanning, accuracy, trueness, precision

CLC Number:

R783.3

BAO Xudong, YUE Lin. Scanning accuracy of intraoral scanning systems and control of its influencing factors[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(9): 769-773.

References

[1] Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, et al. Recent advances in dental optics-Part Ⅰ: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry[J]. Opt Lasers Eng, 2014, 54:203-221.
[2] 王勇. 口内数字印模技术[J]. 口腔医学, 2015, 35(9):705-709, 743.
[3] 张馨月, 李虹, 赵一姣, 等. 两种结构光口内三维扫描仪获取单冠预备体数据质量的模型评价[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2016, 51(7):432-436.
[4] 肖静, 滕伟. 三维数字化扫描在口腔修复领域中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(1):63-67.
[5] Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, et al. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro:A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility[J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(3):320-326.
[6] Jeon JH, Lee KT, Kim HY, et al. White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2013, 5(4):452-456.
[7] 姜楠, 包旭东, 岳林. 全冠预备体终止线局部扫描正确度对整体的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1):102-108.
[8] International Organization For Standardization. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1:General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:1994)[Z]. 1997.
[9] 王勇, 赵一姣, 司燕. 与三维测量有关的名词浅析[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2009, 16(2):111-113.
[10] Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2016, 20(7):1495-1504.
[11] Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, et al. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression:An in vitro descriptive comparison[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018, 18(1):27.
[12] Kurz M, Attin T, Mehl A. Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system[J].Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(8):2035-2043.
[13] Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, et al. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner[J]. Quintessence Int, 2016, 47(4):343-349.
[14] Shin Y, Park S, Park JW, et al. Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths:An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(1):109-115.
[15] Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies:A review to make a successful impression[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2017, 2017:8427595.
[16] 熊芳, 夏辉. 3种半透性测量指标的比较性研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(3):281-285.
[17] Li H, Lyu PJ, Wang Y, et al. Influence of object translucency on the scanning accuracy of a powder-free intraoral scanner:A laboratory study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(1):93-101.
[18] Nedelcu RG, Persson ASK. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners:An in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(6):1461-1471.
[19] Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, et al. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines[J]. J Prosthodont, 2012, 21(4):291-295.
[20] Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents:An in vitro evaluation[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2004, 92(3):250-257.
[21] Anh JW, Park JM, Chun YS, et al. A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners:Effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2016, 46(1):3-12.

Scanning accuracy of intraoral scanning systems and control of its influencing factors

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHEN Yuyan, ZHANG Zhihong, LIU Honghong, HAN Qian, CHEN Jia, DUAN Linna. Influence of cortical bone thickness in mandibular posterior region on the accuracy of implantation [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(8): 713-716.
[2]	YANG Ting, TANG Wanrong. Research progress of digital impression in edentulous jaws [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(3): 284-288.
[3]	. Research progress on accuracy and application of CBCT in quantitative measurement of alveolar surgery [J]. , 2020, 40(10): 951-955.
[4]	. The application of surgery guides to precise reduction of mandibular comminuted fractures [J]. , 2019, 39(8): 714-718.
[5]	. An in vitro study of the precision of CAD/CAM guides in the posterior area [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 15-19.
[6]	. Factors affecting the precision of 3D printing prosthesis [J]. , 2018, 38(9): 860-864.
[7]	. An in vivo evaluation of the accuracy of 3Shape TRIOS for the whole maxilla [J]. , 2018, 38(9): 808-813.
[8]	. Accuracy of digital impression in gingival soft tissues of patients with chronic periodontitis [J]. , 2018, 38(5): 422-427.
[9]	. The comparison of precision among three types method of cavity preparation directed by simple template of dental implant centered on repair. [J]. , 2016, 36(9): 832-834.
[10]	. The development and progress of the indirect bonding technology [J]. , 2015, 35(4): 318-320.