上颌交替快速扩缩结合前牵的研究进展

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.12.018

Abstract

Abstract: Alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions (Alt-RAMEC) is a new method of expansion proposed by Liou in 2005, which expands sutures around maxilla more effectively and leads to greater amount of maxillary protraction. Compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask, it can obtain better skeletal effects and correct maxillary deficiency more efficiently. This paper reviews characteristics of the conventional Alt-RAMEC device, clinical outcomes, long-term stability, airway changes and periodontal complications in order to provide reference for promoting clinical application.

Key words: alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions, maxillary protraction, skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion

CLC Number:

R783.5

HU Wenjing, YU Fei, GONG Guoliang, ZOU Mingyuan, LIN Xinping. Progress of research on alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(12): 1144-1148.

References

[1] Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, et al. Components of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents[J]. Angle Orthod, 1986, 56(1):7-30.
[2] Foersch M, Jacobs C, Wriedt S,et al. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 19(6):1181-1192.
[3] Liou EJW, Tsai WC. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: Repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2005, 42(2):121-127.
[4] Wang YC, Chang PMS, Liou EJW. Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(2):230-234.
[5] Feng GY, Zou BS, Zeng XL. Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2014, 34(6):935-941.
[6] Wilmes B, Ngan P, Liou EJW, et al. Early Class Ⅲ facemask treatment with the hybrid hyrax and Alt-RAMEC protocol[J]. J Clin Orthod, 2014, 48(2):84-93.
[7] Al-Mozany SA, Dalci O, Almuzian M, et al. A novel method for treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in growing patients[J]. Prog Orthod, 2017, 18(1):40.
[8] Almuzian M, Almukhtar A, Ulhaq A,et al. 3D effects of a bone-anchored intra-oral protraction in treating Class Ⅲ growing patient: A pilot study[J]. Prog Orthod, 2019, 20(1):37.
[9] Martínez-Smit R, Aristizabal JF, Pereira Filho VA. Correction of Class Ⅲ malocclusion with alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions using a hybrid hyrax-mandibular miniplate combination and simultaneous orthodontic treatment: A case report[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2019, 49(5):338-346.
[10] Lee WC, Shieh YS, Liao YF, et al. Long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(2):e0247027.
[11] Wu ZP, Zhang X, Li ZX, et al. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of orthopaedic treatment in Class Ⅲ malocclusion: Maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage or a rapid maxillary expander[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2020, 23(1):1-15.
[12] Hu S, An K, Peng Y. Comparative efficacy of the bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols for orthopaedic treatment in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2021: 2021Sep1.
[13] Zhao TT, Hua F, He H. Alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (alt-RAMEC) may be more effective than rapid maxillary expansion alone for protraction facial mask treatment[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2020, 20(2):101408.
[14] Almuzian M, McConnell E, Darendeliler MA, et al. The effectiveness of alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction combined with maxillary protraction in the treatment of patients with a Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthod, 2018, 45(4):250-259.
[15] Buyukcavus MH, Kale B, Aydemir B. Comparison of treatment effects of different maxillary protraction methods in skeletal Class Ⅲ patients[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2020, 23(4):445-454.
[16] Fischer B, Masucci C, Ruellas A,et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the maxillary effects of two orthopaedic protocols for the treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A prospective study[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2018, 21(4):248-257.
[17] Sitaropoulou V, Yilmaz HN, Yilmaz B, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment results of the Alt-RAMEC and facemask protocol in growing patients[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2020, 81(6):407-418.
[18] Onem Ozbilen E, Yilmaz HN, Kucukkeles N. Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocols followed by facemask therapy[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2019, 49(1):49-58.
[19] Celikoglu M, Buyukcavus MH. Changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position after maxillary protraction with different alternate rapid maxillary expansion and construction protocols: A prospective clinical study[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017, 87(4):519-525.
[20] 邓丽嘉, 贺红, Peter Ngan. 上颌交替式快速扩缩后气道的二维和三维变化[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2016, 37(6):960-964.
[21] Kale B, Buyukcavus MH. Determining the short-term effects of different maxillary protraction methods on pharyngeal airway dimensions[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2021, 24(4):543-552.
[22] Çoban Büyükbayraktar Z, Doruk C, Doğan M, et al. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion or alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction on nasal mucociliary clearance: A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2021: 2021Jun30.
[23] Akyalcin S, Alexander SP, Silva RM, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional root surface changes and resorption following rapid maxillary expansion: A cone beam computed tomography investigation[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2015, 18(Suppl 1):117-126.
[24] Brunetto M, Andriani J, Ribeiro GLU, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of buccal alveolar bone after rapid and slow maxillary expansion: A clinical trial study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 143(5):633-644.
[25] Lemos Rinaldi MR, Azeredo F, Martinelli de Lima E, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone plate and root length after maxillary expansion using tooth-borne and tooth-tissue-borne banded expanders[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 154(4):504-516.
[26] Özbilen EÖ, Yilmaz HN, Acar YB. Does Alt-RAMEC protocol and facemask treatment affect dentoalveolar structures?[J]. Angle Orthod, 2021, 91(5):626-633.
[27] Gandedkar NH, Liou EJW. The immediate effect of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions on the alveolus: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study[J]. Prog Orthod, 2018, 19(1):40.
[28] Seker ED, Yagci A, Kurt Demirsoy K. Dental root development associated with treatments by rapid maxillary expansion/reverse headgear and slow maxillary expansion[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2019, 41(5):544-550.
[29] Jacob HB, Ribeiro GLU, English JD, et al. A 3-D evaluation of transverse dentoalveolar changes and maxillary first molar root length after rapid or slow maxillary expansion in children[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2019, 24(3):79-87.
[30] Zilberman Y, Fuks A, Ben Bassat Y,et al. Effect of trauma to primary incisors on root development of their permanent successors[J]. Pediatr Dent, 1986, 8(4):289-293.
[31] Yilmaz BS, Seker ED, Yilmaz HN, et al. Do we pay for maxillary protraction? Evaluation of the effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol and face mask treatment on root development[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(3):3203-3211.
[32] Lee WC, Shieh YS, Liao YF, et al. Long-term maxillary three dimensional changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent Sci, 2021, 16(1):168-177.
[33] Meazzini MC, Torre C, Cappello A, et al. Long-term follow-up of late maxillary orthopedic advancement with the Liou-Alternate rapid maxillary expansion-constriction technique in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(2):221-230.
[34] Meazzini MC, Zappia LB, Tortora C, et al. Short- and long-term effects of late maxillary advancement with the liou-alt-RAMEC protocol in unilateral cleft lip and palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2019, 56(2):159-167.
[35] Baheti N, Bhad W, Dhage A, et al. Evaluation of stress distribution in maxilla, mandible, and glenoid Fossa after Class Ⅲ intermaxillary traction: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study[J]. Int J Orthod Rehabil, 2021, 12(3):91.
[36] de Clerck H, Nguyen T, de Paula LK, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid Fossa changes after bone-anchored Class Ⅲ intermaxillary traction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 142(1):25-31.
[37] Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Paniagua B,et al. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class Ⅲ correction[J]. Angle Orthod, 2014, 84(2):329-336.

Progress of research on alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DU Ying, WANG Xiaoqin, REN Juan. CBCT analysis of condylar and occlusal plane features in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion patients with mandibular asymmetry [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(3): 228-232.
[2]	Ling ZHU. Research progress of maxillary protraction with miniscrew implant in treatment of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion caused by maxillary deficiency [J]. , 2019, 39(9): 844-848.
[3]	. Orthodontic treatment of an adult patient with mandibular deviation and temporomandibular joint disorder — a case report [J]. , 2018, 38(5): 453-456.
[4]	. Cephalometric variables to predict prognosis of early Class III malocclusion treated by face mask [J]. , 2018, 38(4): 342-345.
[5]	. Finite element analysis of anchorage stability in maxillary protraction assisted by modified miniplate implants [J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1102-1105.
[6]	. Three-dimensional finite element analysisi on the displacement trend of maxilla using two types of modified miniplate implants to assist maxillary protraction treatment [J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1096-1101.
[7]	Juan DU. Clinical effect analysis of early treatment to skeletal class Ill high angle with the tongue thrust habit cases by maxillary protraction and tongue crib [J]. , 2016, 36(9): 809-812.
[8]	. A comparative study on maxillary protraction therapy with two different methods of rapid palatal expansion [J]. , 2015, 35(9): 767-769.
[9]	. Orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally and horizontally impacted maxillary canine in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. , 2013, 33(8): 551-554.