拔除前磨牙正畸病例的磨牙支抗丧失及其影响因素

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2025.01.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In orthodontic treatment for protrusion, premolar extraction is a common option. The extraction spaces are closed by the reciprocal movement of posterior and anterior teeth. However, the unclear question is, after extracting the first or second premolars in the maxilla or mandible, what amount is the“anchorage loss”(mesial movement)of the molars when the spaces closed using intra-arch reciprocal anchorage only. We reviewed a large number of clinical studies on orthodontic treatment involving the extraction of premolars to investigate the factors related to molar anchorage loss. Existing studies have explored the influence of physiological factors such as age, occlusal relationship, and vertical facial profile, as well as treatment factors such as tooth extraction site, appliance system, and gap closure method on the molar anchorage loss in orthodontic cases involving the extraction of premolars. The reported molar anchorage loss under different conditions has certain reference value for the orthodontic extraction plan making and anchorage design. More high-quality clinical studies are needed to further clarify this important clinical issue in the future.

Key words: premolar extraction, orthodontic treatment, anchorage loss, molar mesialization, treatment planning

CLC Number:

R783.5

ZHOU Yue, TANG Zhenxing, LI Yu. Molar anchorage loss and its influencing factors in orthodontic cases with premolar extraction[J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(1): 64-68.

Figures/Tables 1

References 41

[1]	Tang ZX, Chen WC, Mei L, et al. Relative anchorage loss under reciprocal anchorage in mandibular premolar extraction cases treated with clear aligners[J]. Angle Orthod, 2023, 93(4): 375-381. doi: 10.2319/102222-727.1 pmid: 37343197
[2]	Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, et al. Anchorage loss: A multifactorial response[J]. Angle Orthod, 2003, 73(6): 730-737.
[3]	Dai FF, Xu TM, Shu G. Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with invisalign[J]. Angle Orthod, 2019, 89(5): 679-687.
[4]	Martinelli FL, de Oliveira Ruellas AC, de Lima EM, et al. Natural changes of the maxillary first molars in adolescents with skeletal Class Ⅱmalocclusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(6): 775-781.
[5]	Horner KA, Behrents RG, Kim KB, et al. Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 142(2): 170-178.
[6]	Ghafari JG, Ammoury MJ. Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 158(3): 343-348.
[7]	胡飞, 肖珲. 安氏Ⅰ类高、低角型正畸病例牙齿移动速度的比较研究[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2005, 21(14): 1519-1520.
[8]	George SM, Campbell PM, Tadlock LP, et al. Keys to Class Ⅱ correction: A comparison of 2 extraction protocols[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 159(3): 333-342.
[9]	Venkatesh S, Rozario J, Ganeshkar SV, et al. Comparative evaluation of sagittal anchorage loss in lingual and labial appliances during space closure: A pilot study[J]. APOS Trends Orthod, 2014, 5: 33-37.
[10]	Sardana R, Chugh VK, Bhatia NK, et al. Rate and anchorage loss during en-masse retraction between friction and frictionless mechanics: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2023, 26(4): 598-607.
[11]	Kim TK, Kim JT, Mah J, et al. First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension[J]. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(2): 177-182.
[12]	Al-Nimri KS. Changes in mandibular incisor position in Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion treated with premolar extractions[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124(6): 708-713.
[13]	Wang YT, Yu HX, Jiang CM, et al. Vertical changes in Class I malocclusion between 2 different extraction patterns[J]. Saudi Med J, 2013, 34(3): 302-306. pmid: 23475096
[14]	Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 117(3): 351-361.
[15]	许天民. 正畸支抗新视角: 生理性支抗控制系列讲座(一)[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2015, 22(1): 45-49.
[16]	Tsourakis AK, Johnston LE. Class Ⅱ malocclusion: The aftermath of a “perfect storm”[J]. Semin Orthod, 2014, 20(1): 59-73.
[17]	Zhou QZ, UlHaq AA, Tian L, et al. Canine retraction and anchorage loss self-ligating versus conventional brackets: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1): 136.
[18]	El-Bialy T, Alobeid A, Dirk C, et al. Comparison of force loss due to friction of different wire sizes and materials in conventional and new self-ligating orthodontic brackets during simulated canine retraction[J]. Fortschr Der Kieferorthopadie, 2019, 80(2): 68-78.
[19]	Dehbi H, Azaroual MF, Zaoui F, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review[J]. Int Orthod, 2017, 15(3): 297-311.
[20]	Abu-Shahba R, Alassiry A. Comparative evaluation of the maxillary canine retraction rate and anchorage loss between two types of self-ligating brackets using sliding mechanics[J]. J Orthod Sci, 2019, 8: 3. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_73_18 pmid: 31001495
[21]	Chen S, Chen G, Xu TM. Clinical application of the PASS technique[J]. J Clin Orthod, 2015, 49(8): 508-515.
[22]	Su H, Xu K, Feng T, et al. Three-dimensional change of molar position during alignment and leveling with PASS and MBT^TM:A randomized controlled trial[J]. Res Sq,2021-13.
[23]	Li Y, Tang N, Xu ZR, et al. Bidimensional techniques for stronger anterior torque control in extraction cases: A combined clinical and typodont study[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(4): 715-722. doi: 10.2319/082811-550.1 pmid: 22149540
[24]	Chen HZ, Han B, Jiang RP, et al. PASS versus MBT^TM for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2021, 43(1): 113-119.
[25]	Dai FF, Xu TM, Shu G. Comparison of achieved and predicted crown movement in adults after 4 first premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(6): 805-813.
[26]	Behnaz M, Farahnaki A, Rahimipour K, et al. Lingual orthodontic treatment: Efficacy and complications[J]. J Adv Oral Res, 2019, 10(2): 65-74.
[27]	Xu TM, Zhang XY, Oh HS, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(5): 544. e1-544. e9;discussion 544-545.
[28]	Schneider PP, GandiniJúnior LG, Monini ADC, et al. Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2019, 89(2): 190-199. doi: 10.2319/051518-363.1 pmid: 30475647
[29]	Pritam A. Comparison of en masse retraction and two-step retraction in the maxillary and mandibular arches during the orthodontic space closure[J]. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res, 2020, 9(1):1-4.
[30]	罗晶, 王智伟, 惠娜娜, 等. 一步法和两步法关闭间隙对不同支抗影响的研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2017, 33(2): 229-234.
[31]	Singhal C, Goyal V, Singh G, et al. To evaluate and compare the rate of space closure and incisor retraction between sliding mechanics and CNA mushroom loop archwire using indirect anchorage[J]. J Contemp Orthod, 2023, 3(4): 13-18.
[32]	Sueri MY, Turk T. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction[J]. Angle Orthod, 2006, 76(6): 1010-1014. pmid: 17090165
[33]	Mehdi Araghbidikashani AH, Mohsen Merati SSK, Mojtaba Sabzijate MBTG. The impact of canine retraction on anchorage loss in two methods of active lace back and NiTi closed coil spring[J]. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res, 2017, 8(3):1630-1635.
[34]	Hashemzadeh H, Soleimani M, Golbar M, et al. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study[J]. Int Orthod, 2022, 20(1): 100601.
[35]	Murugesan A, Dinesh SPS, Sivakumar A, et al. Evaluating the effect of denosumab in preventing anchorage loss: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2021, 22(12): 1399-1405. pmid: 35656677
[36]	Zeitounlouian TS, Zeno KG, Brad BA, et al. Effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin(i-PRF)in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized split-mouth-controlled trial[J]. Fortschr Der Kieferorthopadie, 2021, 82(4): 268-277.
[37]	Moradinejad M, Chaharmahali R, Shamohammadi M, et al. Low-level laser therapy, piezocision, or their combination vs. conventional treatment for orthodontic tooth movement: A hierarchical 6-arm split-mouth randomized clinical trial[J]. Fortschr Der Kieferorthopadie, 2024, 85(2): 110-122.
[38]	Alhaija ESA, Al-Areqi MM, Maaitah EFA. Comparison of second molar protraction using different timing for piezocision application: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2022, 27(4): e2220503.
[39]	Hawkins VM, Papadopoulou AK, Wong M, et al. The effect of piezocision vs no piezocision on maxillary extraction space closure: A split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop, 2022, 161(1): 7-19. e2.
[40]	Al-Shafi S, Pandis N, Darendeliler MA, et al. Effect of light-emitting diode-mediated photobiomodulation on extraction space closure in adolescents and young adults: A split-mouth, randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(1): 19-28.
[41]	Mistry D, Dalci O, Papageorgiou SN, et al. The effects of a clinically feasible application of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A triple-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 157(4): 444-453.

Molar anchorage loss and its influencing factors in orthodontic cases with premolar extraction

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 1

References 41

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	BAO Jiaqi, WANG Zhongxiu, FENG Yimiao, LEI Lihong, CHEN Lili. Management of periodontal hard tissue related complications in orthodontic treatment [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(1): 37-44.
[2]	ZHAO Tingting, HE Hong. Clinical pathway for the treatment of malocclusion in children with OSA [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(8): 561-564.
[3]	LIU Anqi, XIA Lunguo. Digital early intervention and multi-disciplinary treatment with malocclusion [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(8): 576-580.
[4]	GUO Kai, HAN Xinying, MA Haojie, LIU Lijuan, YANG Fanghong. One case of double-stage orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class Ⅱ combined with impacted teeth [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(5): 338-343.
[5]	HUANG Hong, LI Yuan, JING Qiuping, SHI Yijin, YANG Shengjun, WANG Dongmiao. Factors affecting the eruption status of mandibular third molars in adolescent orthodontic patients [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(8): 697-701.
[6]	ZHANG Kejia, SHI Xueming, HU Danyan, QIAN Xinyao, LIU Luwei, CAO Dan, YAN Bin. Analysis of contributing factors for gingivial black trangle after non-extraction orthodontic treatment of crowded mandibular anterior teeth [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(6): 518-523.
[7]	XIANG Yanyan, SONG Dongsheng, WANG Shaotai, WANG Min. Aesthetic considerations of anterior zone in oral treatment [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(9): 838-841.
[8]	HE Dongming, MAO Lixia, LIU Kai, JIANG Lingyong, SHEN Guofang, ZHU Min, WANG Xudong. Combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment by using “accurate tooth-bone movement surgery first approach”, ideas and trials in digital medicine era [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(1): 20-28.
[9]	NI Jieli, WU Qingheng, HOU Wei, CAI Huayang, ZHANG Yang, GUO Shuyu. CBCT study on position changes of incisors and lips after orthodontic treatment in adult female patients with convex facial profiles [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(1): 53-57.
[10]	Ying-Qian WU. Malocclusion assessment index and its application in early orthodontic treatment [J]. , 2020, 40(5): 476-480.
[11]	. Retrospective analysis of the combination of orthodontic and prosthodontics on congenitally missing teeth [J]. , 2020, 40(2): 151-156.
[12]	. Application of three-dimensional digital technology in extraction or non-extraction of orthodontic cases [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 44-47.
[13]	. Research of pain during orthodontic treatment [J]. , 2018, 38(6): 556-559.
[14]	. Orthodontic treatment of an adult patient with mandibular deviation and temporomandibular joint disorder — a case report [J]. , 2018, 38(5): 453-456.
[15]	. Evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest before and after non-extraction orthodontic treatment by cone beam computed tomography [J]. , 2018, 38(11): 1011-1014.