颧牙槽嵴支抗稳定性影响因素的三维有限元分析

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2025.02.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the influence of micro-implant length and screw angle on stress distribution and displacement of micro-implant bone interface when micro-implant was implanted in zygomatic alveolar ridge and bear a certain load, in order to provide certain theoretical basis for micro-implant selection and further optimization design in clinical practice. Methods A three-dimensional finite element model of the jaw in the zygomatic alveolar ridge region was established using ANSYS software. At the same time, 35 kinds of micro-threaded implants with length of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 mm and angle of 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 90°, 105°, 120° were established. The micro-implant was simulated to be implanted in the jaw bone, and the implantation model was established. Stress analysis was performed on the bone interface of the micro-implant. Results The maximum stress of micro-implant bone interface occurred in the bone cortex. The maximum stress value of buccal cortical bone, cancellous bone and micro-implant displacement decreased with the increase of screw length. The angle of screw had little effect on the maximum stress and displacement of micro-implant-bone interface. Conclusion The screw length has an impact on stress distribution of micro-implant bone interface. The micro-implant with longer length can improve its stability in zygomatic alveolar ridge.

Key words: micro-implant, three dimensional finite element analysis, screw angle, length

CLC Number:

R783.5

LIU Ke, XUAN Shijie, LIU Xin. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of factors affecting stability of anchorage in zygomatic alveolar ridge[J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(2): 100-104.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.2

References 19

[1]	Leo M, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G, et al. Temporary anchorage devices(TADs) in orthodontics: Review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants[J]. Clin Ter, 2016, 167(3): e70-77.
[2]	Liu HB, Wu XX, Yang L, et al. Safe zones for miniscrews in maxillary dentition distalization assessed with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(3): 500-506.
[3]	Liu L, Zhan Q, Zhou J, et al. Effectiveness of an anterior mini-screw in achieving incisor intrusion and palatal root torque for anterior retraction with clear aligners[J]. Angle Orthod, 2021, 91(6): 794-803. doi: 10.2319/120420-982.1 pmid: 34061964
[4]	丁熙, 朱形好, 林芝, 等. 不同植入扭矩对种植体骨界面生物力学特性的影响[J]. 医用生物力学, 2013, 28(2): 184-188.
[5]	Choi JY, Cho J, Oh SH, et al. Effect of different surface designs on the rotational resistance and stability of orthodontic miniscrews: A three-dimensional finite element study[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(6): 1964.
[6]	Laursen MG, Melsen B, Cattaneo PM. An evaluation of insertion sites for mini-implants: A micro-CT study of human autopsy material[J]. Angle Orthod, 2013, 83(2): 222-229. doi: 10.2319/042512-344.1 pmid: 22920309
[7]	林仰东, 吴也可. 影响微种植体支抗稳定性的相关因素[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(8): 1295-1300.
[8]	Ye YS, Jiao JY, Fan S, et al. Optimization analysis of two-factor continuous variable between thread depth and pitch of microimplant under toque force[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2022: 2119534.
[9]	刘鑫, 刘岚, 刘遥, 等. 微小种植体支抗的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2010, 30(9): 520-522.
[10]	张然, 武建勋. 圣维南原理的一般性能量衰减指标[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(3): 14-17,25.
[11]	Takahashi N, Kitagami T, Komori T. Behaviour of teeth under various loading conditions with finite element method[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1980, 7(6): 453-461. pmid: 6937613
[12]	Singh S, Mogra S, Shetty VS, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength, stability, and stress distribution in orthodontic anchorage: A conical, self-drilling miniscrew implant system[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 141(3): 327-336.
[13]	Petrey JS, Saunders MM, Kluemper GT, et al. Temporary anchorage device insertion variables: Effects on retention[J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80(4): 446-453. doi: 10.2319/070309-376.1 pmid: 20482347
[14]	Pickard MB, Dechow P, Rossouw PE, et al. Effects of miniscrew orientation on implant stability and resistance to failure[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(1): 91-99.
[15]	Sarul M, Minch L, Park HS, et al. Effect of the length of orthodontic mini-screw implants on their long-term stability: A prospective study[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(1): 33-38. doi: 10.2319/112113-857.1 pmid: 24745630
[16]	Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A, et al. Impact of mini-implant length on stability at the initial healing period:A controlled clinical study[J]. Head Face Med, 2013, 9: 30. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-9-30 pmid: 24382059
[17]	Chatzigianni A, Keilig L, Reimann S, et al. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(4): 381-387.
[18]	Cui MX, Qi Y, Xue LF, et al. Comparative study of stress characteristics around the adjacent teeth tissues during insertion of mini-screws with different insertion angles: A three-dimensional finite element study[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2023, 142: 105879.
[19]	Ardani IGAW, Indharmawan R, Hamid T. The effect of miniscrew length and bone density on anchorage resistance: An in vitro study[J]. Int Orthod, 2019, 17(3): 446-450.

模型	材料	弹性模量/ MPa	泊松比	模型单元数量	模型节点数量
重点研究对象	骨皮质	14 700	0.30	25 773	5 956
	骨松质	1 500	0.30	24 709	5 270
	种植体	110 000	0.35	8 297	1 844
其他非研究对象				89 908	27 157

样本1	样本2	r	P
螺纹顶角/ (°)	颊板皮质骨最大应力值/MPa	0.062	0.722
	松质骨最大应力值/MPa	-0.134	0.442
	窦底皮质骨最大应力值/MPa	-0.023	0.897
	微种植体最大应力值/MPa	-0.367	0.030^*
	微种植体最大位移量/mm	0.208	0.231
螺杆长度/ mm	颊板皮质骨最大应力值/MPa	-0.784	0.000^*
	松质骨最大应力值/MPa	-0.874	0.000^*
	窦底皮质骨最大应力值/MPa	0.006	0.973
	微种植体最大应力值/MPa	0.396	0.018^*
	微种植体最大位移量/mm	-0.628	0.000^*

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of factors affecting stability of anchorage in zygomatic alveolar ridge

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 19

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Ruiqing, XU Yingjie, WU Yingtao. Progress in clinical application of flapless crown lengthening [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(2): 151-155.
[2]	ZHOU Ju, MA Junqing. Three-dimensional evaluation of the correlation between thickness of supporting tissue in the palatal paramedian section and palatal vault morphology [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(1): 36-40.
[3]	JIANG Zhenze, ZOU Mingyuan, GONG Guoliang, LIN Xinping. The effect of different conditions of the second molar on maxillary molar distalization using Modified C Palatal Plate——A 3-dimensional finite analysis [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(9): 808-813.
[4]	ZHANG Yifei, YANG Qi, LI Cheng, LI Lu. Clinical application of Nd:YAG laser to improve the periodontal microecological imbalance in periodontitis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(7): 619-624.
[5]	LU Jianfeng, GUO Haibo, QIU Jing. The clinical study on micro-osteoperforations aiding to depress molars in orthodontic treatment before restoration [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(11): 1000-1005.
[6]	. Study on crown-root indexes of central incisor of early youth by cone beam computed tomography [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 30-34.
[7]	Bin Xing. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of brackets torque in the process of mass retraction of maxillary anterior teeth [J]. , 2018, 38(5): 440-444.
[8]	. The upper airway dimensions changes in treatment of Non-extration class III malocclusion patients [J]. , 2018, 38(5): 437-439.
[9]	. Effect of fiber post length and abutment height on stress distribution of post-core restoration [J]. , 2018, 38(3): 202-205.
[10]	. To measure the length of maxillary central incisors by panoramic radiographs among individuals in Jiangsu Province [J]. , 2017, 37(7): 612-614.
[11]	. Review on retraction and intrusion of anterior teeth with micro-implant anchorage [J]. , 2017, 37(5): 470-473.
[12]	Zhi JianLi. Evaluating the accuracy of estimating work length by direct digital panoramic [J]. , 2016, 36(1): 71-73.
[13]	. [J]. , 2015, 35(2): 108-111.
[14]	. Effect of mandibular arch width and length on uprightness distortion ratio of the mandibular posterior area in digital pantomography [J]. , 2014, 34(7): 543-546.
[15]	. Clinical application of molar distalization by micro implant anchorage [J]. , 2014, 34(6): 444-446.