›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 665-667.
• Basic and Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract: [Abstracts] Objective To compare the efficacy and the safety of Cyclosporine with Fluocinolone acetonide for erosive oral lichen planus. Methods Randomized controlled trial design: A total of 60 erosive OLP patients were randomly divided into two groups(use random table),every group 30 patients,were given Cyclosporine(test group) and Fluocinolone acetonide ointment(control group) respectively for 6 weeks.The efficacy and safety were evaluated at the end of treatment. After 3 months make a review. Results Effective rate of test group was 93.3%, control group 96.7%. Visual Analogue Score of test group was 24.73± 15.65 ,control group 34.27±16.36.After treatment there were not signi?cantly different between two medicine to Promote lesion healing(X2=0.351, P>0.05). Cyclosporine was better than Fluocinolone acetonide in relieve pain(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reaction of Cyclosporine was less than Fluocinolone acetonide during treatment process.The After 3 month: Effective rate of test group 96.7%, control group 80.0%. Test group VAS 26.63±17.01,control group37.37±18.43。 Cyclosporine was better than Fluocinolone acetonide in promote lesion healing(X2=4.043, P<0.05) and relieve pain(P<0.05).Conclusion Cyclosporine has more positive efficacy and safety than Fluocinolone acetonide. Cyclosporine worthy of further clinical application.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.stomatology.cn/EN/
https://www.stomatology.cn/EN/Y2013/V33/I10/665