微种植体支抗推磨牙向远中移动的临床应用

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of two anchorage devices on molar distal movement． Methods Thirty patients with Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion because of antedisplacement of maxillary molars were randomly divided into two groups:micro implant anchorage combined with molar propeller group (group A) and Nance palatal holding arch combined with molar propeller group (group B).To compare cephalometric lateral radiographs before treatment and after molar distalization in place,The results of changes in craniofacial hard tissue after molar distalization were evaluated. Results Changes in SNA、SNB、ANB in two groups had no significant difference before and after treatment.Changes in U1-NA,U1-SN in group B were bigger than those of group A before and after the treatment.Two groups had no significant difference in moving distances of molars (P>0.05).However,the monthly average rate of movement in group A was significantly higher than that of group B. Conclusions Preliminary clinical observation shows that the application of micro implant anchorage for distal movement of molars can control the anchorage better.It has higher moving speed causes little foreign body sensation,and it′s easy to clean,and it leads to better treatment result.

Key words: micro-implant anchorage, distal movement of molars, Nance palatal plate, molar propeller

CLC Number:

R783.5

References

[1] 段银钟.口腔正畸临床固定矫治技术［M］.西安：世界图书出版公司,2001:5-6
[2]Keim RG,Berkman C.Intra-arch maxillary distalization-appliances for class II correction[J].J Clin Orthod,2004,38(9):505-511
[3]高美琴，顾永佳，吴燕平，等.微螺钉型种植体支抗与传统强支抗在上颌前突正畸治疗中的对比研究[J].口腔医学,2007,27(9):28-30
[4]Lim G,Kim KD,Park W,et al.Endodontic and surgical treatment of root damage caused by orthodontic miniscrewplacement[J].J Endod,2013,39(8):1073-1077
[5]Lim SM,Hong RY.Distal movement of malnrs u-sing a lever-arm and mini-implant system[J].Angle Orthod,2008,78(1):167-175
[6]Bolla E,Muratore F,Carano A,et al.Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet:a comparison with other contemporary methods[J].Angle Orthod,2002,72(5):481-494
[7]Chung KR,Cho JH,Kim SH,et al.Unusual extraction treatment in Class II Division I using c-orthodontic mini-implants[J].Angle Orthod,2007,77(1):155-166
[8]Oberti G,Villegas C,Ealo M,et al.Maxillaymolar distalization with the dual-force Distalizer suppor-ted by mini-implants:A clinical study[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,135(3):282-
[9]Profitt WR,Fields HW JR.Mechanical principles in orthodontic force control[J].Contemporary Orthodontics,2000,31(5):326-361
[10]Lee JS,Park HS,Kyung HM.Micro-implant anchorage for lingual treatment of a skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J].J Clin Orthod,2001,35(10):643-647
[11]Fritz U,Diedrich P,Kinzinger G,et al.The anchorage quality of mini-implants towards translatory and extrusive forces[J].J Orofac Orthop,2003,64(4):293-304
[12]林久祥.国产微螺钉种植体支抗远中移动牙齿动物实验研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2009,25(1):96-98
[13]马俊青,王林,王震东,等.微型支抗种植体稳定性的动物实验研究[J].口腔医学,2004,32(11):19-21
[14]段银钟.种植体支抗协助推上颌磨牙向远中[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(10):577-580
[15]Chung KR,Nelson G,Kim SH,et al.Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2007,132(1):105-115
[16]Upadhyay M,Yadav S,Nagaraj K,et al.Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients:A randomized controlled trial[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2008,134(1):18-29

Clinical application of molar distalization by micro implant anchorage

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Study on the curative effect of different treatment modes for congenital absence of single mandibular incisor [J]. , 2022, 42(11): 1015-1018.
[2]	Jian-Feng LU. The clinical study of micro-osteoperforations aiding to depress molars in the orthodontic treatment before restoration [J]. , 2022, 42(11): 1000-1005.
[3]	. CBCT assisted evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest in Class I extraction cases [J]. , 2022, 42(11): 1011-1014.
[4]	. Effect of Piezo1 on RIP3 and MLKL in periodontal tissue of the pressure side during tooth movement in rats [J]. , 2022, 42(10): 883-888.
[5]	. Biomechanical research progress of clear aligner technique [J]. , 2022, 42(10): 951-955.
[6]	. Study on root resorption of mandibular third molars after long distance mesial movement [J]. , 2022, 42(10): 900-904.
[7]	Yi-Geng Liu Yun Lu. A cone-beam computed tomography study on relationship between the root and the alveolar ridge crest of maxillary molars and maxillary sinus floor [J]. , 2022, 42(10): 889-894.
[8]	. Effects of different adhesive removal methods on enamel microstructure and rebonding strength of brackets [J]. , 2022, 42(9): 785-789.
[9]	. Study on the Effect of Invisible Mandibular-Advancement Appliance in the Treatment of Skeletal Cass Ⅱ Patients [J]. , 2022, 42(9): 813-817.
[10]	. Changes of bone mass in missing mandibular first molar space before and after closure [J]. , 2022, 42(9): 818-823.
[11]	. Research progress on efficiency and factors of maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners [J]. , 2022, 42(9): 851-855.
[12]	Jing-Ying HAN. Rsearch progress on the influence of extraction mode of premolars on Bolton ratio in orthodontics [J]. , 2022, 42(9): 856-859.
[13]	. Digital multidisciplinary treatment of an adult patient with high-angle skeletal class II malocclusion and obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome [J]. , 2022, 42(9): 824-830.
[14]	. A New Method For Distal Movement of Unilateral Mandibular First Permanent Molar and The Clinical Efficacy Evaluation [J]. , 2022, 42(8): 707-712.
[15]	. Research Progress in Micro-osteoperforations Accelerated Orthodontic Tooth Movement [J]. , 2022, 42(8): 732-736.