[1] Naumann M, Reich S, Nothdurft FP,et al. Survival of glass fiber post restorations over 5 years[J]. Am J Dent, 2008, 21(4):267-272. [2] Thanatvarakorn O, Prasansuttiporn T, Thittaweerat S,et al. Smear layer-deproteinizing improves bonding of one-step self-etch adhesives to dentin[J]. Dent Mater, 2017, 34(3):434-441. [3] Mirseifinejad R, Tabrizizadeh M, Davari A, et al. Efficacy of different root canal irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation[J]. Iran Endod J, 2017, 12(2):185-190. [4] Su Z, Li Z, Shen Y, et al. Characteristics of the irrigant flow in a simulated lateral canal under two typical laser-activated irrigation regimens[J].Lasers Surg Med,2020,53(4):587-594. [5] 关卿, 王晓丽, 何文喜. 激光活化荡洗在根管治疗中的作用[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2018, 11(11):650-654. [6] George R, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ. Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(12):1524-1527. [7] 何睿莹, 唐旭炎. Er, Cr: YSGG激光联合不同冲洗剂预处理离体牙桩道对纤维桩粘接强度的影响[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61(8):32-36. [8] Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, et al. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming[J].J Endod, 2011, 37(7):1008-1012. [9] Pedullà E, Genovese C, Campagna E, et al. Decontamination efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) of irrigants using low-energy laser settings: An ex vivo study[J].Int Endod J, 2012, 45(9):865-870. [10] Do QL, Gaudin A.The Efficiency of the Er:YAG laser and photon- induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) as an activation method in endodontic irrigation: A literature review[J].J Lasers Med Sci, 2020, 11(3):316-331. [11] 孙宁佳,郭威.Er:YAG激光和超声荡洗对根管内壁形态及微渗漏的比较研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2017,27(12):689-697. [12] 刘畅, 刘红, 杨春英. 6种冲洗剂组合对桩道内壁超微结构的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(5):650-654. [13] Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, et al. Comparative study about the removal of smear layer by three types of laser devices[J]. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 1998, 16(2):117-122. [14] Arslan D, Guneser MB, Dincer AN, et al.Comparison of smear layer removal ability of QMix with different activation techniques[J].J Endod, 2016, 42(8):1279-1285. [15] Thapak G, Arya A, Grewal MS, et al. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal using erbium:YAG laser-activated irrigation, sonic irrigation, and manual dynamic irrigation: A scanning electron microscope study[J].J Lasers Med Sci, 2021, 12(1):e22. [16] Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling JQ, et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(6):791-804. [17] Malki M, Verhaagen B, Jiang LM, et al. Irrigant flow beyond the insertion depth of an ultrasonically oscillating file in straight and curved root canals: visualization and cleaning efficacy[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(5):657-661. [18] Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(1):143-146. [19] Kamaci A, Aydin B, Erdilek N. The effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation and laser based root canal irrigation methods on debris removal[J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2017, 41(2):41-45. [20] Lloyd A, Uhles JP, Clement DJ, et al. Elimination of intracanal tissue and debris through a novel laser-activated system assessed using high-resolution micro-computed tomography: A pilot study[J].J Endod, 2014, 40(4):584-587. [21] Groot SDD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: Cleaning efficacy and flow visualization[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 42(12):1077-1083. [22] Moor R, Meire M, Goharkhay K, et al.Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs[J].J Endod, 2010, 36(9):1580-1583. [23] Arslan H, Capar ID, Saygili G, et al. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris[J]. Int Endod J, 2014, 47(11):1072-1077. [24] Arslan H, Ylmaz CB, Karatas E, et al.Efficacy of different treatments of root canal walls on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts[J].Lasers Med Sci, 2015, 30(2):863-868. [25] 常颖, 王学玲, 王维丽, 等. 桩道牙本质壁的不同处理对纤维桩粘接强度的影响[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2015, 16(3):169-173. [26] 李进红, 金冬梅, 王素. 不同参数激光处理根管对纤维桩粘结强度影响的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(1):102-105. [27] 万书, 谭裕洁, 解静, 等. 不同桩道预处理对玻璃纤维桩粘接强度的影响[J]. 西南医科大学学报, 2020, 43(5):433-438. [28] Lukač N, Jezeršek M. Amplification of pressure waves in laser-assisted endodontics with synchronized delivery of Er: YAG laser pulses[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2018, 33(4):823-833. [29] Ohl CD, Arora M, Dijkink R, et al.Surface cleaning from laser-induced cavitation bubbles[J].Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 89(7):074102-074102-3. [30] De Icaza-Herrera M, Fernández, Francisco, et al.Combined short and long-delay tandem shock waves to improve shock wave lithotripsy according to the Gilmore-Akulichev theory.[J].Ultrasonics, 2015, 58:53-59. [31] Gregori P, Petkovek R, Moina J, et al.Measurements of cavitation bubble dynamics based on beam-deflection probe[J].Appl Phys A, 2008, 93(4):901-905. [32] 王晓娜, 石晶. 新型饵激光与超声对根管荡洗作用的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(4):328-332. [33] Jezeršek M, Jereb T, Lukač N, et al. Evaluation of apical extrusion during novel Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation modality[J].Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg,2019,37(9), 544-550. [34] Jezeršek M, Lukač N, Lukač M. Measurement of simulated debris removal rates in an artificial root canal to optimize laser-activated irrigation parameters[J].Lasers Surg Med,2021,53(3):411-417. [35] Kosarieh E, Bolhari B, Pirayvatlou SS, et al. Effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation using SWEEPS and PIPS technique on dye penetration depth after root canal preparation[J].Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020, 33(3):102136. [36] 林欣欣. 采用铒激光荡洗技术清理根管玷污层的体外研究[D].北京:中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,2019. [37] Arcolu B, Kman AA, Babacan M. Thecomparison of cleaning efficacy and apical extrusion of advanced irrigation activationmethodswith a novel Er:YAG laser modality: sweeps[J].Lasers Dent Sci, 2021, 5(1):43-52. |