4种抛光套装对cercon氧化锆抛光后表面粗糙度的对比研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.10.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the polishing finish of four different polishing tools. Methods Fifty specimens were selected from suitable zirconia and randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 specimens in each group. Group A was the negative control group; Group B was the EVE group; Group C was the SHOFU group; Group D was the Toboom group, and Group E was the NAIS group. All specimens were subjected to surface roughness measurements after each level of treatment. One specimen in each group was randomly selected after each level of treatment and put into the vacuum coater for surface gold spraying, and then put into the scanning electron microscope for surface morphology observation after vacuuming. Results Final Ra value: The negative group ((1.677±0.066)μm)>SHOFU group ((0.357±0.037)μm)>EVE group ((0.248±0.051)μm)>Toboom group ((0.115±0.039)μm) and NAIS group ((0.123±0.029)μm). Scanning electron microscope observation showed that the deepest and longest scratches were left on the surface of the specimen with the diamond needle, and the surface of the specimen was gradually smoothed by using the polishing kit to treat the surfacein turn. The surface of the specimens polished by NAIS group and Toboom group had the least and shallow scratches under the mirror. Conclusion Toboom and NAIS zirconia polishing tools provide the best polishing results.

Key words: cercon zirconia, polished, Ra value, scanning electron microscope

CLC Number:

R783.2

HAN Yuxi, ZHANG Weijun, XU Jing, YAO Mengting, QU Zhe, ZHANG Xiang. Comparative study on surface roughness of polishing cercon zirconia with four polishing tools[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(10): 759-764.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 21

[1]	郭亚林, 魏煦, 景建龙. 三种扫描流程制作氧化锆修复体的临床效果比较研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(11): 1006-1010.
[2]	Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part Ⅱ[J]. Quintessence Int, 2017, 48(6): 441-450. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a38157 pmid: 28497132
[3]	Nassary Zadeh P, Lümkemann N, Sener B, et al. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 120(6): 948-954. doi: S0022-3913(18)30066-0 pmid: 29807742
[4]	Park C, Vang MS, Park SW, et al. Effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of zirconia and the durability of the polishing systems[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(3): 430-437. doi: S0022-3913(16)30536-4 pmid: 28088308
[5]	Chavali R, Lin CP, Lawson NC. Evaluation of different polishing systems and speeds for dental zirconia[J]. J Prosthodont, 2017, 26(5): 410-418. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12396 pmid: 26618785
[6]	Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature[J]. Dent Mater, 1997, 13(4): 258-269. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3 pmid: 11696906
[7]	Kozmacs C, Hollmann B, Arnold WH, et al. Polishing of monolithic zirconia crowns-results of different dental practitioner groups[J]. Dent J, 2017, 5(4): 30.
[8]	刘晓强, 刘明月, 杨洋, 等. 氧化锆和玻璃陶瓷颜色及半透明度稳定性的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4): 335-338. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.04.013
[9]	Flury S, Diebold E, Peutzfeldt A, et al. Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(6): 767-774. doi: S0022-3913(16)30458-9 pmid: 27836147
[10]	Al-Haj Husain N, Camilleri J, Özcan M. Effect of polishing instruments and polishing regimens on surface topography and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia: An evaluation with XPS and XRD analysis[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2016, 64: 104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.025 pmid: 27497266
[11]	赵鑫. 牙科陶瓷磨抛后表面性状的实验研究[D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2007.
[12]	Silva TM, Salvia ACRD, Carvalho RF, et al. Polishing for glass ceramics: Which protocol?[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2014, 58(3): 160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.02.001 pmid: 24684959
[13]	徐少红. 高速磨削加工工艺及应用[J]. 电加工与模具, 2007(S1): 34-36,75.
[14]	韩雷. 陶瓷磨削表面加工损伤检测与实验研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2007.
[15]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 产品几何技术规范(GPS)表面结构,轮廓法,表面粗糙度参数及其数值 GB/T1031—2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009:2-5.
[16]	Kelly J, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: Historical evolution and current practice[J]. Aust Dent J, 2011, 56: 84-96.
[17]	孙硕, 梁锐英, 任婧, 等. 抛光和上釉对氧化锆修复体与牙釉质磨损性能的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2016, 51(5): 300-304.
[18]	张凯, 吴凤鸣. 表面抛光和上釉对Y-TZP全瓷表面粗糙度及磨耗性能的影响[J]. 口腔医学, 2017, 37(10): 914-917.
[19]	川井善之. チタンの研磨術式の検討[J]. 鶴見歯学, 1997:23.
[20]	Flury S, Lussi A, Zimmerli B. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2010, 35(4): 470-481. doi: 10.2341/09-373-L pmid: 20672733
[21]	Yin L, Nakanishi Y, Alao AR, et al. A review of engineered zirconia surfaces in biomedical applications[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 65: 284-290.

分组	抛光工具	粗糙程度	货号	转速/(r/min)	是否喷水	抛光时长/min
A	-	-		-	-	-
B	EVE(德国)	粗	DYP13g	10 000	否	2
		中粗	H8DCmf	10 000	否	2
		细	H8DC	10 000	否	2
C	SHOFU(日本)	粗	DHP70	15 000	否	2
		中	PA~0564	10 000	否	2
		细	SF~0121	10 000	否	2
D	道邦(中国)	中粗	RD2023	20 000	否	2
		粗	RD2024	20 000	否	2
		极细	RD2025	15 000	否	2
		超细	RD2026	15 000	否	2
E	NAIS(保加利亚)	粗	ZD112Cd	8 000	否	2
		中粗	L17M	10 000	否	2
		细	L17F	10 000	否	2

分组	未处理	绿砂石	第一级	第二级	第三级
A	1.677±0.066^a	—	—	—	—
B	—	0.981±0.063	0.408±0.061	0.248±0.051^b	—
C	—	0.489±0.039	0.394±0.044	0.357±0.037^c	—
D	—	0.379±0.062	0.204±0.049	0.147±0.022	0.115±0.039^d
E	—	0.616±0.055	0.189±0.022	0.123±0.029^d	—

Comparative study on surface roughness of polishing cercon zirconia with four polishing tools

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XIAO Min, LIU Jin, FAN Xiaomin, WU Haoze, WANG Jueyu, WANG Kejing, LI Na, JIANG Wenkai, MEI Xiaohan. The effect of sonic activated device used for different time on intracanal smear layer removal: An SEM analysis [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(1): 46-51.
[2]	. Effect of different coating methods on adhesive strength of deciduous teeth by self etching binder [J]. , 2018, 38(8): 690-693.
[3]	. Microcosmic and dynamic analysis of the implant-bone interface at early stage in hyperlipidemic rats [J]. , 2016, 36(4): 327-332.
[4]	. Scanning electron microscope observation of occlusion effect on dentinal tubule by two application methods of bioglass [J]. , 2016, 36(11): 997-1001.
[5]	. Scanning electron microscopic study on the cleaning ability of different kinds of ultrasonic irrigants and rinsing time after root canal preparation [J]. , 2016, 36(1): 44-49.
[6]	. Effect of different silanization treatments on the bond strength of fiber posts with scanning electron microscope [J]. , 2014, 34(11): 815-818.
[7]	. Research of Icon resin infiltrates to repair initial enamel lesions with various pre-treatment methods [J]. , 2013, 33(10): 675-678.