CEREC CAD/CAM 系统中仿生重建的咬合面的精度测量

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的定量测量CEREC CAD/CAM系统中生物仿造的咬合面与天然牙咬合面的变化。方法通过InfiniteFocus扫描系统获取20个完整的上颌第一磨牙的超硬石膏模型的三维模型。在模型的三维坐标系统中测量近中舌尖最高点（lMPC）及中央窝最低点（lCP）相对近中颊尖最高点的高度以及过近中舌尖最高点和中央窝最低点直线与水平面之最小夹角（∠MPC）。随后在石膏模型上进行近中舌尖的嵌体窝洞预备。于CEREC椅旁系统之中利用生物仿造模式（biogeneric tooth model）自动生成嵌体设计并在瓷块中切割出修复体。瓷嵌体就位于石膏模型后置于InfiniteFocus中扫描并测量相同的3个指标。通过t检验检测3组指标的差值是否具有统计学意义。通过Pearson相关性分析探索各指标的变异与牙尖斜度之间的关系。结果各指标间的变异分别为??lMPC＝（101.87±33.21）μm, ??lCP＝（-201.72±55.28）μm以及??∠MPC＝（4.66°±0.31°）。3组指标之差值均具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。三组指标的变异中只有△MPCINC与牙尖斜度存在明显相关性（P＜0.01）。结论生物仿造模式自动生成之修复体咬合面与原天然牙咬颌面仍存在明显差异。

关键词: CAD/CAM，咬合面形态，嵌体，恢复性，仿生重建模式，上颌第一磨牙

Abstract: Objective To metrically assess the vertical changes of the occlusal landmarks for biogenerically reconstructed inlays in CEREC CAD/CAM system. Methods Stone replicas of 20 untreated maxillary first molars were scanned and measured with Infinite Focus system. Relative heights of the tip of mesiopalatal cusp (MPC) and the central pit (CP) to the tip of mesiobuccal cusp were calculated and the inclination of the line passing through MPC and CP was measured as a representation of the mesiopalatal cuspal inclination (MPCINC). The casts were prepared for mesiopalatal inlay restoration and restored with CEREC chair-side system using biogeneric tooth model. Inlays seated on the corresponding casts were scanned again. The same items were measured and calculated. Differences between the restorations and natural teeth (△MPC, △CP and △MPCINC) were tested by paired Student’s t test (P=0.05). Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreements between the two occlusal surfaces. Relationships between the differences and MPCINC of natural tooth were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results The vertical differences of occlusal landmarks between natural teeth and biogeneric reconstructions were (101.87±33.21) μm for MPC, (-201.72±55.28) μm for CP and (4.66°±0.31°) for MPCINC. All three differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between △MPCINC and MPCINC of natural tooth (P<0.01) while △MPC and △CP were independent from MPCINC. Conclusions Significant differences associated with three occlusal landmarks exist between the automatic occlusal reproduction by biogeneric tooth model and the natural occlusal morphology.

Key words: CAD/CAM, occlusal morphology, inlays, reproducibility, biogeneric tooth model, maxillary first molars

中图分类号:

R783.3

梁立宗陶建祥冉洁鲁嘉韦. CEREC CAD/CAM 系统中仿生重建的咬合面的精度测量[J]. , 2017, 37(10): 885-888.

参考文献

[1]Wiskott HW,Belser UC.A rationale for a simplified occlusal design in restorative dentistry: historical review and clinical guidelines[J].J Prosthet Dent,1995,73(2):169-183
[2]Türp JC,Greene CS,Strub JR.Dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past,present and future concepts[J].J Oral Rehabil,2008,35(6):446-453
[3]Koyano K,Tsukiyama Y,Kuwatsuru R.Rehabilitation of occlusion - science or art?[J].J Oral Rehabil,2012,39(7):513-521
[4]Neff P.Trauma from occlusion: restorative concerns[J].Dent Clin North Am,1995,39(2):335-354
[5]Beuer F,Schweiger J,Edelhoff D.Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations[J].Br Dent J,2008,204(9):505-511
[6]M?rmann WH.The evolution of the CEREC system[J].J Am Dent Assoc,2006,137(Suppl.):7-S
[7]Mehl A,Blanz V,Hickel R.Biogeneric tooth: a new mathematical representation for tooth morphology in lower first molars[J].Eur J Oral Sci,2005,113(4):333-340
[8]Mehl A,Blanz V,Hickel R.A new mathematical process for the calculation of average forms of teeth[J].J Prosthet Dent,2005,94(6):561-566
[9]Fasbinder DJ.The CEREC system[J].J Am Dent Assoc,2014,141(Suppl.):3-S
[10]Mehl A,Blanz V.New procedure for fully automatic occlusal surface reconstruction by means of a biogeneric tooth model[J].Int J Comput Dent,2005,8(1):13-25
[11]Reich SM,Peltz ID,Wichmann M,et al.A comparative study of two CEREC software systems in evaluating manufacturing time and accuracy of restorations[J].Gen Dent,2005,53(3):195-198
[12]Reiss B.Cerec standard 3-d occlusal contouring in comparison with the new biogeneric occlusal morphing: a case report[J].Int J Comput Dent,2007,10(1):69-75
[13]Ender A,M?rmann WH,Mehl A.Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology[J].Clin Oral Invest,2010,15(2):283-289
[14]Litzenburger AP,Hickel R,Richter MJ,et al.Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians' design[J].Clin Oral Invest,2013,17(2):491-496
[15]Kollmuss M,Jakob F-M,Kirchner H-G,et al.Comparison of biogenerically reconstructed and waxed-up complete occlusal surfaces with respect to the original tooth morphology[J].Clin Oral Invest,2013,17(3):851-857
[16]Kollmuss M,Kist S,Goeke JE,et al.Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology,occlusion,and aesthetics[J].Clin Oral Invest,2016,20(4):791-797
[17]Kwon HB,Kim HK,Shon WJ,et al.A comparison between the occlusal morphology of virtually reconstructed posterior crowns and natural molars[J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2014,34(4):e73-e78
[18]Reich S,Brungsberg B,Teschner H,et al.The occlusal precision of laboratory versus CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic crowns[J].Am J Dent,2010,23(1):53-56
[19]Schroettner H,Schmied M,Scherer S.Comparison of 3D surface reconstruction data from certified depth standards obtained by SEM and an infinite focus measurement machine (IFM)[J].Mikrochim Acta,2006,155(1):279-284
[20]R?li J,Flood PR.A simple method for the determination of thickness and grain size of deposited films as used on non-conductive specimens for scanning electron microscopy[J].J Microsc,2011,112(3):359-364
[21]Falcón-Antenucci RM,Pellizzer EP,de Carvalho PSP,et al.Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesesA three-dimensional finite element analysis[J].. J Prosthodont,2010,19(5):381-386
[22]Haketa T.Influences of cusp inclination on stability and function of removable partial dentures[J].Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi,1993,60(1):81-97
[23]Hickel R,Manhart J.Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure[J].J Adhes Dent,2001,3(1):45-64
[24]Fasbinder DJ.Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations[J].J Am Dent Assoc,2006,137(Suppl):22-S
[25]Williams WN,Lapointe LL,Thornby JI.Interdental thickness discrimination by normal subjects[J].J Dent Res,1974,53(6):1404-1407
[26]Tamaki K,Ishigaki S,Ogawa T,et al.Japan Prosthodontic Society position paper on "occlusal discomfort syndrome"[J].J Prosthodont Res,2016,60(3):156-166
[27]Hara ES,Matsuka Y,Minakuchi H,et al.Occlusal dysesthesia: a qualitative systematic review of the epidemiology,aetiology and management[J].J Oral Rehabil,2012,39(8):630-638
[28]Ono Y,Kobayashi G,Hayama R,et al.Prefrontal hemodynamic changes associated with subjective sense of occlusal discomfort[J].Biomed Res Int,2015,2015(1):395-405
[29]Hanihara T,Ishida H.Metric dental variation of major human populations[J].Am J Phys Anthropol,2005,128(2):287-298
[30]Ling JYK,Wong RWK.Tooth dimensions of southern Chinese[J].Homo,2007,58(1):67-73
[31]Brook AH,Griffin RC,Townsend G,et al.Variability and patterning in permanent tooth size of four human ethnic groups[J].Arch Oral Biol,2009,54(Suppl):S79-S85