›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 1021-1025.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

酸蚀对乳牙玻璃离子窝沟封闭微渗漏和微拉伸强度的比较研究

武洁1,2,刘茜3,陈央兰4,周红艳5,梅予锋3   

  1. 1. 南京市妇幼保健院
    2. 南京医科大学附属妇产医院
    3. 南京医科大学口腔医学院
    4. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
    5. 南京医科大学口腔医学院儿童口腔预防科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-01 修回日期:2020-05-29 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2020-11-24
  • 通讯作者: 梅予锋 E-mail:yfmei@njmu.edu.cn

Comparison of microleakage and microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer cement sealant with or without acid etching in primary molars

  • Received:2020-04-01 Revised:2020-05-29 Online:2020-11-28 Published:2020-11-24

摘要: [摘要] 目的 通过比较分析酸蚀处理乳牙釉质表面,对玻璃离子窝沟封闭材料的微渗漏和微拉伸强度的影响。方法离体第二乳磨牙24颗,随机分为酸蚀和液体处理两组,两组均采用Ketac?Molar Easymix玻璃离子和非创伤性充填指压技术进行窝沟封闭。分别进行微渗漏和微拉伸强度实验,并用扫描电镜观察两组窝沟釉质表面微结构变化,剖面封闭剂与窝沟结合界面的状况。结果:酸蚀组微渗漏评分低于液体处理液组,有高度显着性差异(p < 0.05)。酸蚀组微拉伸结合强度(MPa) 0.93±0.40,高于液体处理组0.56±0.22,有显着性差异(p < 0.05)。扫描电镜图像显示酸蚀后釉质表面呈典型蚀刻模式,剖面封闭材料与釉质表面有嵌合样结合层,液体处理后釉质与封闭材料界面出现连续微间隙。结论:酸蚀在釉质表面形成微孔结构,有利于玻璃离子进入增加与釉质结构的嵌合,并减少微渗漏,增强粘结强度,建议临床常规使用,在社区实施群体预防窝沟封闭术中,可采用生产商配套液体处理,以节省操作时间

关键词: 乳牙, 玻璃离子, 窝沟封闭, 酸蚀, 微渗漏, 微拉伸

Abstract: Objective To compare the microleakage and microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer cement sealant with or without acid etching in primary molars. Methods A total 24 second primary molars in vitro were randomly divided into two groups: the acid etching and the liquid conditioned groups. Both groups were placed in pit and fissure sealant with Ketac Molar Easymix glass ionomer by ART filling finger pressing technique. Then the microleakage and the microtensile strength tests were performed, the microsurface changes of enamel of the samples and the conditions of the section combination and interface of pits and fissures with sealant were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results The microleakage score in the acid etching group was lower than the liquid conditioned group with significant difference (P<0.05). The microtensile bond strengths of the acid etching and the liquid group were (0.93±0.40)MPa and (0.56±0.22)MPa, respectively, indicating significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). SEM images showed that enamel surfaces presented topical etching pattern and the enamel and GIC interface revealed the hybridlikely layer in the acid etching sample. The continuous microgap was found between the enamel and GIC interface in the conditioner sample. Conclusion Acid etching produces microporous structure on the surface of enamel, which is conducive to improve GIC sealant penetration and the bonding with enamel structure and reduce microleakage.

Key words: primary teeth, glass ionomer cement, pit and fissure sealant, acid etching , microleakage, microtensile bond strengths

中图分类号: