口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 210-214.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.03.004

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

3D打印钴铬合金和铸造钴铬合金的理化性能和生物相容性的比较

刘爽1, 马国武2   

  1. 1 大连市口腔医院综合急诊科,辽宁大连(116021);
    2 大连医科大学口腔医学院,辽宁大连(116044)
  • 修回日期:2021-10-18 出版日期:2022-03-28 发布日期:2022-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 马国武 E-mail:mgw640242000@aliyun.com

Comparison of the physicochemical and biocompatibility of cobalt-chromium alloy between 3D printing and casting

LIU Shuang, MA Guowu   

  1. Department of Comprehensive and Emergency Treatment Clinic, Dalian Stomatological Hospital, Dalian 116021, China
  • Revised:2021-10-18 Online:2022-03-28 Published:2022-03-21

摘要: 目的 比较3D打印和传统铸造钴铬合金的理化性能及生物学影响。方法 实验组和对照组分别用3D打印技术中的选择性激光熔融(SLM)和传统铸造技术,制作钴铬合金试件各10个,采用洛氏硬度计HR-150A和金相显微镜对两组分别进行洛氏硬度测定和金相观察,并在自腐蚀电位下对金属试件进行极化曲线测定。在无菌环境下制备试件的浸提液,并将其分为阴性对照组、3D打印钴铬合金浸提液、铸造钴铬合金浸提液(每组5个),利用CCK-8试剂测定浸提液对小鼠成纤维细胞L-929的细胞毒性,运用AnnexinⅤ-FITC/PI荧光染色检测细胞凋亡,用流式细胞仪计算不同组别的凋亡率。结果 3D打印组、铸造组的洛氏硬度分别为70.6±0.1、68.5±0.2,3D打印组强于铸造组,有统计学意义(P<0.005)。3D打印钴铬合金组织没有第二相;铸造组织为树枝晶,第二相强化。3D打印和铸造组钴铬合金在自腐蚀电位下的电流密度分别为4.338 1×10-9 A/cm2和3.378 5×10-8 A/cm2,铸造组电流密度高于3D打印组。在24、48、72 h,阴性对照组的OD平均值约为0.44、1.14、1.50,3D组的OD平均值约为0.39、0.95、1.09,铸造组的OD平均值约为0.35、0.76、1.01,各组间的细胞毒性差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),铸造组细胞毒性最强,各组均随着时间延长细胞毒性逐渐增强。经流式细胞仪分析三组均以正常细胞为主,凋亡率分别为(2.497±0.121)%、(3.513±0.055)%、(5.407±0.401)%,各组间均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 与传统铸造合金相比,3D打印技术制造的钴铬合金具有更好的机械性能和生物相容性,在临床有更好的应用前景。

关键词: 3D打印, 传统铸造, 钴铬合金, 细胞凋亡

Abstract: Objective To compare physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy in 3D printing technology and conventional alloy casting technique. Methods The experimental group and the control group each contained 10 Co-Cr alloy specimens fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) and traditional casting technology respectively. The Rockwell hardness tester HR-150A and the metallurgical microscope were used to compare two groups respectively, and then polarization curve was measured on metal specimens under self-corrosion potential. Leaching solution of the test piece was prepared in a sterile environment, and was divided into negative control group, 3D printing Co-Cr alloy group and cast Co-Cr alloy group (5 per group). Using CCK-8 reagent, the cytotoxicity of the extract to mouse fibroblast L-929 was determined, and the apoptosis was detected by AnnexinⅤ-FITC/PI fluorescence staining; the apoptosis rate of different groups was calculated by flow cytometry. Results The Rockwell hardness of the 3D printing group and the casting group were 70.6±0.1 and 68.5±0.2, respectively. The 3D printing group was stronger than the casting group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (P<0.005). The 3D printed Co-Cr alloy structure didn’t have a second phase; the cast structure was dendritic, and the second phase was strengthened. The current densities of the 3D printing and casting groups of Co-Cr alloys under self-corrosion potential were 4.338 1×10-9 A/cm2 and 3.378 5×10-8 A/cm2, respectively. The current density of the casting group was higher than that of the 3D printing group. At 24, 48 and 72 h, the average OD of the negative control group was approximately 0.44, 1.14, 1.50, the 3D group was 0.39, 0.95, 1.09, the casting group was 0.35, 0.76, 1.01. The differences in cytotoxicity between groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The casting group had the strongest cytotoxicity, and the cytotoxicity of each group gradually increased with time. Flow cytometry suggested primarily normal cells existed in three groups, and the apoptotic rates were (2.497±0.121)%, (3.513±0.055)%, (5.407±0.401)%, and there was statistical significance among each group (P<0.01). Conclusion Compared with traditional casting technology, the cobalt-chromium alloy using 3D printing technology has better mechanical properties and biocompatibility, and has better prospect for clinical application.

Key words: 3D printing, conventional casting, cobalt-chromium alloy, cell apoptosis

中图分类号: