单颗下颌切牙先天缺失不同治疗模式的疗效研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.11.011

口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1015-1018.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.11.011

单颗下颌切牙先天缺失不同治疗模式的疗效研究

张雪莹¹, 沈梦圆¹, 陈彬², 孟箭²

1 蚌埠医学院口腔医学院,安徽蚌埠(233030);
2 徐州市中心医院口腔科,江苏徐州(221000)

收稿日期:2022-05-20 出版日期:2022-11-28 发布日期:2022-11-25
通讯作者: 陈彬 E-mail:chenbin6553@126.com; 孟箭 E-mail:mrocket@126.com
基金资助:
徐州市卫生健康委青年医学科技创新项目(XWKYHT-20210535)

Study on the curative effect of different treatment modes for congenital absence of single mandibular incisor

ZHANG Xueying, SHEN Mengyuan, CHEN Bin, MENG Jian

The School of Stomatology,Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, China

Received:2022-05-20 Online:2022-11-28 Published:2022-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的使用美国正畸专家认证委员会客观评级系统(American Board of Orthodontics-objective grading system,ABO-OGS)和正畸治疗标准指数(peer assessment rating,PAR)评价单颗下颌切牙先天缺失三种矫治方法的疗效,探讨不同治疗方法的疗效是否存在差异。方法选取就诊于徐州市中心医院口腔正畸科的57例单颗下颌切牙先天缺失患者的治疗前后模型和全景片。按照不同的治疗方法将其分为A、B、C三组,A组非拔牙矫治19例;B组拔除前磨牙20例;C组拔除切牙18例,采用ABO-OGS指数和PAR指数分别测量治疗前后模型与全景片,并对结果进行统计学分析。结果治疗前ABO-OGS指数颊舌向倾斜度B组和A组、C组差异具有统计学意义。治疗后ABO-OGS指数三组间总分差异无统计学意义,牙齿排列评分A组和C组差异存在统计学意义。PAR指数治疗前后差值三组之间差异无统计学意义。结论结合患者实际情况来制定合适个性化方案、选择矫治方案,矫治过程中严格执行治疗方案,三种治疗方法都可取得比较满意的矫治效果。

关键词: ABO-OGS指数, PAR指数, 先天缺牙, 疗效评价

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the curative effect of different orthodontic treatment Methods for single mandibular incisors with American Board of Orthodontics-Objective grading system (ABO-OGS) and PAR (peer assessment rating) index, and to explore whether there were differences among three methods. Methods Models and panoramic photos before and after treatment of 57 patients with congenital absence of single mandibular incisors in the Orthodontics Department of Xuzhou Central Hospital were selected. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into three groups:A, B and C. Group A had 19 cases of non-extraction treatment. 20 premolars were extracted in group B. In group C, 18 incisors were extracted. ABO-OGS index and PAR index were used to measure the model and panorama before and after treatment, and the results were statistically analyzed. Results Before treatment, the difference of ABO-OGS index between group B, group A and group C was statistically significant. After treatment, there was no significant difference in the total score of ABO-OGS index among the three groups, but there was significant difference in tooth arrangement between group A and group C. There was no significant difference between three groups before and after PAR index treatment. Conclusion According to the actual situation of patients, we should formulate appropriate personalized plan, select treatment method and strictly implement it during treatment. All three treatment Methods can achieve satisfactory results.

Key words: ABO-OGS index, PAR index, congenital missing tooth, curative effect evaluation

中图分类号:

R783.5

张雪莹, 沈梦圆, 陈彬, 孟箭. 单颗下颌切牙先天缺失不同治疗模式的疗效研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(11): 1015-1018.

ZHANG Xueying, SHEN Mengyuan, CHEN Bin, MENG Jian. Study on the curative effect of different treatment modes for congenital absence of single mandibular incisor[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(11): 1015-1018.

参考文献

[1] Jurek A,Gozdowski D, Czochrowska EM, et al. Effect of tooth agenesis on mandibular morphology and position[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(22):11876.
[2] Tatematsu T, Kimura M, Nakashima M, et al. An aberrant splice acceptor site due to a novel intronic nucleotide substitution in MSX1 gene is the cause of congenital tooth agenesis in a Japanese family[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6):e0128227.
[3] 凌琪, 赵玉梅. 先天缺牙相关基因的研究进展[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2019, 40(1):128-132.
[4] Gracco ALT, Zanatta S, Forin Valvecchi F, et al. Prevalence of dental agenesis in a sample of Italian orthodontic patients:An epidemiological study[J]. Prog Orthod, 2017, 18(1):33.
[5] de Stefani A, Bruno G, Conte E, et al. Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis in Angle class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion in Italy:A case-control study[J]. Int Orthod, 2019, 17(3):538-543.
[6] 赵晓雪,侯菲菲,马腾飞,等.4 002名高校学生先天缺牙及牙齿畸形的现况调查[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2019, 25(1):43-46.
[7] 李婧, 张卫兵. 骨性Ⅰ类女性下切牙先天缺失者颏部形态的三维研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(10):915-918.
[8] Nett BC, Huang GJ. Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 127(4):444-450;quiz516.
[9] 宋广瀛, 姜若萍, 张晓芸, 等. 正畸疗效主、客观评价方法的有效性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1):90-97.
[10] 王以玲, 魏竹亮, 王春玲. 济南地区下切牙先天缺失患者颌面形态研究[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2012, 19(3):158-161.
[11] Gorucu-Coskuner H, Atik E, Akarsu-Guven B. Symmetry of crown widths in subjects with unilateral maxillary lateral incisor agenesis[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2021:2021Apr14.
[12] 桂娟, 李琥, 龚青华, 等. ABO-OGS指数及头影测量评价下颌2个切牙缺失的正畸疗效分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(21):235-236.
[13] 傅民魁. 口腔正畸专科教程[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007:569-574.
[14] 商英楠, 王稚英. Bolton指数指导矫治单个下切牙先天缺失的临床应用[J]. 辽宁医学院学报, 2010, 31(2):126-128.
[15] 袁代润, 钱红, 闫英剑. 下切牙先天缺失错牙合畸形的临床治疗[J]. 中国美容医学, 2011, 20(2):291-293.
[16] 黄婧. 下颌先天缺失两颗切牙的非常规拔牙矫治体会[J]. 当代医学, 2018, 24(15):80-81.
[17] 刘晓莉, 邵玶. 第二恒磨牙错位的相关因素研究[J]. 中国美容医学, 2018, 27(7):64-67.
[18] 林非欧, 林新平, 倪振宇. 正畸治疗对第二磨牙错位萌出影响的初步研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2011, 31(3):171-174.
[19] 陈旭. 拔牙与不拔牙矫治对牙弓宽度的影响分析[J]. 中国高新区, 2018,14:274.
[20] 张玺, 王翔, 王林, 等. 前牙深覆盖伴单颗下中切牙先天缺失患者不同拔牙模式疗效的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(9):956-959.
[21] 赵蔚, 朱麒, 陈慧霞. 先天缺牙患者正畸矫治效果的PAR指数分析研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2012, 32(10):601-602, 616.
[22] Liu S, Oh H, Chambers　DW, et al. Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2017, 20(3):140-145.

单颗下颌切牙先天缺失不同治疗模式的疗效研究

Study on the curative effect of different treatment modes for congenital absence of single mandibular incisor

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张赟, 李小兵. 上颌扩弓疗效评价的临床意义及发展方向[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(7): 659-663.
[2]	陈旭朱姝李畅邱广蓉郭艳. 一先天缺牙家系基因芯片检测分析及FGF20基因的检测[J]. , 2014, 34(7): 500-504.
[3]	田玉楼,王鑫,王坤,刘芳. 应用PAR指数评价拔除龋坏第一恒磨牙的矫治效果[J]. , 2012, 32(7): 403-405,425.
[4]	赵蔚,朱麒,陈慧霞. 先天缺牙患者正畸矫治效果的PAR指数分析研究[J]. , 2012, 32(10): 601-602,616.
[5]	迪丽努尔·阿吉,张　婕,李　亮,阿不拉江·阿那也提,阿米娜·阿不都古勒. PAX9基因在2个新疆维吾尔族非综合征型先天缺牙家系中的表达[J]. , 2011, 31(6): 339-342.
[6]	王小旻,李　琥. 透明压膜保持器与Hawley保持器对拔牙病例的保持效果比较[J]. , 2011, 31(6): 352-355.
[7]	王霏霏,迪丽努尔·阿吉,陈冲,李伯琦. 新疆维、汉大学生恒牙先天缺失情况的调查分析[J]. , 2010, 30(07): 431-433.
[8]	曹宇皎;邵玶;安晶涛;牟明奎;闫伟军;张敏. 轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错牙合矫治后牙牙合关系的PAR指数评价[J]. , 2007, 27(6): 298-399.
[9]	张春利;马俊青;潘永初;吴国华;黄优. 江苏地区正畸患者Bolton指数不调原因调查[J]. , 2007, 27(11): 575-577.
[10]	杨长湖;金钫;郭丹;齐荣锦;周学军. 62例伴先天缺牙错牙合畸形的正畸治疗临床分析[J]. , 2007, 27(1): 11-13.
[11]	许全林,吴斌,俞立英. 甲硝唑药膜治疗牙周病临床疗效评价[J]. , 2000, 20(2): 105-106.