口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 904-911.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.12.005

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

4种支架材料下不同的咬合接触对上颌All-on-4即刻负载影响的有限元分析

江楠1,2,3,顾卫平1,2,3()   

  1. 1 南京医科大学附属口腔医院综合诊疗科,江苏南京(210029)
    2 口腔疾病研究与防治国家级重点实验室培育建设点,江苏南京(210029)
    3 江苏省口腔转化医学工程研究中心,江苏南京(210029)
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-26 出版日期:2024-12-28 发布日期:2024-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 顾卫平 Tel:(025)69593022 E-mail:willim90@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科教能力提升工程—江苏省研究型医院建设单位(YJXYYJSDW4);江苏省医学创新中心(CXZX202227);南京市卫生科技发展专项基金(YKK20246)

Finite element analysis of the influence of occlusal contact on maxillary All-on-4 immediate loading under different framework materials

JIANG Nan1,2,3,GU Weiping1,2,3()   

  1. Department of General Dentistry, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2024-04-26 Online:2024-12-28 Published:2024-12-26

摘要:

目的 探索在4种支架材料下,符合生物力学设计原则的上颌All-on-4即刻负载的咬合接触设计方案。方法 选取1例上颌无牙颌锥形束CT数据,结合牙冠、支架、基台、种植体的参数,设定钛、钴铬合金、聚醚醚酮(polyetheretherketone,PEEK)、树脂4种支架材料,根据前牙或悬臂是否有咬合接触建立4组有限元模型(AC组:前牙和悬臂均有负载;ANC组:前牙有负载,悬臂无负载;NAC组:前牙无负载,悬臂有负载;NANC组:前牙和悬臂均无负载),计算皮质骨、种植体、支架的应力值,种植体的微动,支架的变形量,并进行统计学分析。结果 4种支架材料下,皮质骨应力峰值:NAC组最大,ANC组最小,NAC组与其他三组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);种植体应力峰值:ANC组最大,当支架为PEEK或树脂时,ANC组与其他三组有统计学差异(P<0.05);支架应力峰值:当材料为钛或钴铬合金时,NAC组最大,ANC组最小,并与其他三组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);种植体微动或支架变形量:ANC组/NAC组与AC组/NANC组有统计学差异(P<0.05);四种支架材料之间:钛和钴铬合金支架的应力峰值相比PEEK和树脂更大,传递至皮质骨和种植体上的应力更小。结论 ①对于上颌All-on-4即刻负载的咬合接触设计,前牙有负载,悬臂无负载的咬合方案更有利于皮质骨和支架的应力分布。②前牙和悬臂均有负载或前牙和悬臂均无负载有利于降低种植体微动峰值和支架变形量峰值。③支架材料中,钛或钴铬合金支架传递到骨-种植体界面的应力峰值比PEEK或树脂支架小。

关键词: 上颌无牙颌, All-on-4, 即刻负载, 咬合接触, 有限元分析

Abstract:

Objective To explore the occlusal contact designs in accordance with biomechanical principles in the All-on-4 immediate loading scheme of the edentulous maxilla with four kinds of framework materials. Methods Cone beam CT of an edentulous maxilla was selected. The cone beam CT data, crown, framework, abutment and implant data were used and the titanium, cobalt-chromium alloy, polyetheretherketone(PEEK) and resin framework materials were specified. The finite element models were divided into 4 groups, according to whether the anterior teeth or the cantilever had occlusal contact(AC group: both the anterior teeth and the cantilever were loaded;ANC group: load on the anterior teeth and no load on the cantilever; NAC group: no load on the anterior teeth and load on the cantilever;NANC group: no load on both the anterior teeth and the cantilever). The stress of cortical bone, implant and framework, the micromotion of implant and the deformation of framework were calculated and statistical analysis was then performed. Results Among the four types of framework materials, in terms of cortical bone peak stress, the NAC group had the highest value and the ANC group had the lowest. There was a statistical difference between the NAC group and the other three groups respectively(P<0.05). With the four framework materials, in terms of the peak stress of implant, the ANC group had the highest. When the framework material was PEEK or resin, there was a significant difference between the ANC group and the other three groups(P<0.05). The peak stress value of the framework compared, the NAC group had the highest peak stress and was significantly different from the other three groups(P<0.05). The ANC group had the lowest peak stress and was significantly different from the other three groups(P<0.05) when the framework material was titanium or cobalt-chromium alloy. If the framework material was PEEK or resin, there were no statistical differences between the four occlusal schemes. Comparing the peak micromotion of implant or the peak deformation of framework, the ANC/NAC group was significantly higher than the AC/NANC group(P<0.05). Among the different framework materials, titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy had higher peak stress of framework compared to PEEK and resin(P<0.05), with less stress transmitted to the cortical bone and implant(P<0.05). Conclusion ①In terms of occlusal contact design, when the All-on-4 immediate loading scheme is applied to the edentulous maxilla, the scheme that the anterior teeth loaded and the cantilever unloaded(ANC) is more conducive to the stress distribution of bone-implant interface. ②The application of load on both anterior teeth and cantilever(AC) or the absence of load on both anterior teeth and cantilever(NANC) is favourable for reducing the peak micromotion of implant and the peak deformation of framework. ③Among the four types of framework materials, titanium or cobalt-chromium alloy framework transmit less stress to the bone-implant interface than PEEK or resin framework.

Key words: edentulous maxilla, All-on-4, immediate load, occlusal contact, finite element analysis

中图分类号: