口腔医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 506-510.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2025.07.005

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同腭侧颈部骨板厚度对上颌前牙区种植修复体受力影响的三维有限元研究

张茜雅, 毕梦霏, 李非璠, 吴美琪, 沈铭()   

  1. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院综合诊疗科,口腔疾病研究与防治国家级重点实验室培育建设点(南京医科大学),江苏省口腔转化医学工程研究中心,江苏南京(210029)
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-28 出版日期:2025-07-28 发布日期:2025-07-24
  • 通讯作者: 沈 铭 E-mail:shenming@njmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82471017);江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(M2021018);江苏省科教能力提升工程——江苏省研究型医院建设单位(YJXYYJSDW4);江苏省医学创新中心(CXZX202227)

The 3D finite element study on implant restoration in the maxillary anterior region with different palatal bone plate thicknesses

ZHANG Xiya, BI Mengfei, LI Feifan, WU Meiqi, SHEN Ming()   

  1. Department of General Dentistry, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Research on Prevention and Treatment of Oral Diseases (Nanjing Medical University), Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Stomatological Translational Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2025-02-28 Online:2025-07-28 Published:2025-07-24

摘要:

目的 通过三维有限元分析,比较不同腭侧颈部骨板厚度对上颌前牙区种植体及唇侧骨皮质所受应力的影响。方法 利用CBCT扫描数据和有限元软件,构建上颌中切牙种植修复的三维有限元模型,设置种植体腭侧颈部骨板厚度分别为0、0.5、1.0 mm,模拟正常咬合状态下种植体的等效应力及唇侧皮质骨最小主应力(压应力)。结果 在正常咬合状态下,腭侧颈部骨板厚度分别为0、0.5、1.0 mm时,种植体的等效应力最大值均位于种植体与基台交界处的唇侧颈部正中,依次为106.8、103.5、99.7 MPa,而皮质骨的最小主应力均出现在种植体-基台与唇侧牙槽骨交界处的牙槽嵴顶,分别为107.8、103.2、95.6 MPa。结果表明,随着腭侧颈部骨板厚度的减小,种植体的等效应力最大值和唇侧皮质骨的最小主应力均呈上升趋势,但仍未超过各自的屈服强度。结论 从生物力学角度来看,当种植体腭侧颈部骨板厚度为0 mm时,上颌前牙种植修复依然是可行的。

关键词: 种植修复, 上颌前牙, 腭侧骨板, 三维有限元分析

Abstract:

Objective To compare the differences in stress on maxillary anterior implants and labial cortical bone under varying thicknesses of palatal bone plates through three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods Using CBCT scan data and finite element software, a three-dimensional finite element model of maxillary central incisor implant restoration was constructed. The thickness of the palatal bone plate at the cervical region of the implant was set to 0, 0.5, 1.0 mm, respectively. The effects of different palatal bone plate thicknesses on the equivalent stress of the implant and the minimum principal stress (compressive stress) of the labial cortical bone under normal occlusal conditions were simulated. Results Under normal occlusion, when the palatal cervical bone plate thickness was 0, 0.5, 1.0 mm, the maximum equivalent stress of the implant was consistently located at the midline of the labial cervical region at the implant-abutment interface, with values of 106.8, 103.5, 99.71 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, the minimum principal stress of the cortical bone appeared at the alveolar crest at the junction of the implant-abutment and labial alveolar bone, measuring 107.8, 103.2, 95.55 MPa, respectively. The results indicated that as the palatal cervical bone plate thickness decreased, both the maximum equivalent stress of the implant and the minimum principal stress of the labial cortical bone exhibited an increasing trend, though they remained below their respective yield strengths. Conclusion From a biomechanical perspective, maxillary anterior implant restoration remains feasible even when the thickness of the palatal bone plate at the cervical region of the implant is 0 mm.

Key words: implant restoration, maxillary anterior teeth, palatal bone plate, three-dimensional finite element analysis

中图分类号: