口腔医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 136-141.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2026.02.009

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高嵌体与改良嵌体冠修复后牙牙体缺损的临床效果研究

武琼1,2,3, 傅瑜2,3,4, 耿楠2,3,5()   

  1. 1 南京医科大学附属口腔医院综合科, 江苏南京 (210029)
    2 口腔疾病研究与防治国家级重点实验室培育建设点(南京医科大学), 江苏南京 (210029)
    3 江苏省口腔转化医学工程研究中心(南京医科大学), 江苏南京 (210029)
    4 南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科, 江苏南京 (210029)
    5 南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔特诊科, 江苏南京 (210029)
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-26 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-03-09
  • 通讯作者: 耿 楠 Tel:(025)69593051, E-mail:gengnan1673@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    2023年度江苏省卫生健康委课题面上项目(苏卫科教2023-011号);江苏省自然科学基金及重点研发计划项目(BK20221300);江苏省科教能力提升工程——江苏省研究型医院(YJXYYJSDW4);江苏省医学创新中心(CXZX202227)

Study on the clinical effect of onlay and modified inlay crowns in restoring posterior tooth defects

WU Qiong1,2,3, FU Yu2,3,4, GENG Nan2,3,5()   

  1. Department of Polyclinics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2025-08-26 Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-03-09

摘要:

目的 探讨高嵌体与改良嵌体冠用于后牙牙体缺损修复的临床效果。方法 收集南京医科大学附属口腔医院自2021年5月至2023年5月收治的后牙根管治疗后需修复牙体缺损的患者190例共206颗牙冠。根据牙体缺损修复方式分为高嵌体组(102颗)和改良嵌体冠组(104颗)。12个月后分别评价两组患牙的修复效果,并比较两组修复体意外事件发生率及患者满意度。结果 两组患牙修复12个月后,高嵌体组达到改良版美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准A级的比率整体低于改良嵌体冠组,两组在修复体边缘密合性、修复体完整性、继发龋、牙龈健康状况、有无食物嵌塞的A级率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);高嵌体组意外事件总发生率11.96%,高于改良嵌体冠组3.06%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访患者满意度,高嵌体组患者总满意度为87.5%,低于改良嵌体冠组的93.33%,差别无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 应用改良嵌体冠修复后牙牙体缺损的短期临床效果优于高嵌体修复,可获得较好的患者满意度,是效果良好的修复方式。

关键词: 高嵌体, 改良嵌体冠, CAD/CAM, 临床效果

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of onlays and modified inlay-crowns in the restoration of posterior tooth defects. Methods A total of 190 patients(involving 206 crowns) with posterior teeth that required restoration of tooth defects after root canal therapy were collected from the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between May 2021 and May 2023. They were divided into two groups based on the tooth defect restoration method: the onlay group (102 crowns) and the modified inlay-crown group (104 crowns). Twelve months later, the restoration efficacy of the affected teeth in both groups was evaluated, and the incidence of restoration adverse events and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results Twelve months after the restoration of the affected teeth in both groups, the overall rate of achieving Grade A according to the modified United States Public Health Service(USPHS) criteria in the onlay group was lower than that in the modified inlay-crown group. There were no statistically significant differences in the Grade A rates regarding restoration marginal adaptation, restoration integrity,secondary caries,gingival health status and presence of food impaction between the two groups(P>0.05). The total incidence of adverse events in the onlay group was 11.96%, which was higher than the 3.06% in the modified inlay-crown group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). In terms of follow-up patient satisfaction, the total satisfaction rate was 87.5% in the onlay group, lower than the 93.33% in the modified inlay-crown group, but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion The short-term clinical efficacy of modified inlay-crowns in the restoration of posterior tooth defects is superior to that of onlays. Modified inlay-crowns can achieve good patient satisfaction and are an effective restoration method.

Key words: onlay, modified inlay, CAD/CAM, clinical effect

中图分类号: