生物活性玻璃的抗菌机制及其影响因素

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.06.013

Abstract

Abstract: Bioactive glasses(BGs) are bioactive materials based on the SiO₂-Na₂O-CaO-P₂O₅ oxide system. They have good osteogenic activity, antibacterial activity and biocompatibility. BGs have significant antibacterial effects on common oral bacteria in clinic and will not lead to drug resistance. Thus, BGs have application prospects as oral bacteriostatic agents. However, there is no conclusive research on its antibacterial mechanism. This article reviews the antibacterial effects and mechanisms of BGs on common oral pathogens and summarizes its influencing factors.

Key words: bioactive glasses(BGs), antibacterial mechanism, oral bacteriostatic agent

CLC Number:

R783.1

DONG Junchi, ZHENG Huiling, WEI Yuwen, MA Qian. Antibacterial mechanism and influencing factors of bioactive glasses[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(6): 551-556.

References

[1] Heidrich V, Bruno JS, Knebel FH, et al. Dental biofilm microbiota dysbiosis is associated with the risk of acute graft-Versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 692225.
[2] 张瑾, 徐欣. 小分子化合物抗牙菌斑生物膜的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3):204-207.
[3] da Costa Rosa T, de Almeida Neves A, Azcarate-Peril MA, et al. The bacterial microbiome and metabolome in caries progression and arrest[J]. J Oral Microbiol, 2021, 13(1):1886748.
[4] Abushahba F, Söderling E, Aalto-Setälä L, et al. Air abrasion with bioactive glass eradicates Streptococcus mutans biofilm from a sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2019, 45(6):444-450.
[5] Nomura R, Morita Y, Matayoshi S, et al. Inhibitory effect of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) eluate against adhesion and colonization by Streptococcus mutans[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):5056.
[6] Chen XQ, Daliri EB, Tyagi A, et al. Cariogenic biofilm: Pathology-related phenotypes and targeted therapy[J]. Microorganisms, 2021, 9(6):1311.
[7] 乔荣更, 贾宇, 张红星, 等. 可抑制口腔致病菌的乳酸菌筛选及其抑菌特性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(11):75-81.
[8] 范华南, 黄辉, 姜庆坤, 等. 中度和重度牙周炎患者龈下细菌多样性和群落结构分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(8):846-851.
[9] 马巍, 王涛. 低频超声对牙菌斑生物膜促渗作用的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2019, 39(2):179-182.
[10] Mahmoud MY, Sapare S, Curry KC, et al. Rapid release polymeric fibers for inhibition of Porphyromonas gingivalis adherence to Streptococcus gordonii[J]. Front Chem, 2019, 7: 926.
[11] 李懿洋, 周学东. 具核梭杆菌与口腔常见微生物黏附作用的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4):284-287.
[12] Hampelska K, Jaworska MM, Babalska ZŁ, et al. The role of oral microbiota in intra-oral halitosis[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(8):E2484.
[13] Brookes ZLS, Bescos R, Belfield LA, et al. Current uses of chlorhexidine for management of oral disease: A narrative review[J]. J Dent, 2020, 103: 103497.
[14] 向盈盈, 宋飞, 杨向红, 等. 噬菌体疗法在口腔感染性疾病中的应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6):167-173.
[15] Riba-Terés N, Jorba-García A, Toledano-Serrabona J, et al. Microbiota of alveolar osteitis after permanent tooth extractions: A systematic review[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 122(2):173-181.
[16] Kaya S, Cresswell M, Boccaccini AR. Mesoporous silica-based bioactive glasses for antibiotic-free antibacterial applications[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2018, 83: 99-107.
[17] Hench LL. The story of Bioglass^®[J]. J Mater Sci: Mater Med, 2006, 17(11):967-978.
[18] Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Antibacterial activity of particulate bioglass against supra-and subgingival bacteria[J]. Biomaterials, 2001, 22(12):1683-1687.
[19] 许玉婷, 王梦婷, 武琼, 等. 生物活性玻璃对致龋菌及龈上菌斑的抗菌效果研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2014, 34(3):167-170.
[20] Fernandes JS, Gentile P, Pires RA, et al. Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue[J]. Acta Biomater, 2017, 59: 2-11.
[21] Drago L, De Vecchi E, Bortolin M, et al. Antimicrobial activity and resistance selection of different bioglass S53P4 formulations against multidrug resistant strains[J]. Future Microbiol, 2015, 10(8):1293-1299.
[22] Stoor P, Söderling E, Salonen JI. Antibacterial effects of a bioactive glass paste on oral microorganisms[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1998, 56(3):161-165.
[23] Lung CYK, Abdalla MM, Chu CH, et al. A multi-element-doped porous bioactive glass coating for implant applications[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(4):961.
[24] 陈喆. 硅酸盐生物活性玻璃碎片杀菌的机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2012.
[25] Zhang LL, Zhang LF, Hu QP, et al. Chemical composition, antibacterial activity of Cyperus rotundus rhizomes essential oil against Staphylococcus aureus via membrane disruption and apoptosis pathway[J]. Food Control, 2017, 80: 290-296.
[26] Ogawara H. Comparison of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in antibiotic-producing and pathogenic bacteria[J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(19):E3430.
[27] Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, et al. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2019, 37(1):177-192.
[28] Hu S, Chang J, Liu MQ, et al. Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009, 20(1):281-286.
[29] Munukka E, Leppäranta O, Korkeamäki M, et al. Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2008, 19(1):27-32.
[30] Drago L, Toscano M, Bottagisio M. Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: A mini-review[J]. Materials (Basel), 2018, 11(2):E326.
[31] Mohammadi Z, Dummer PM. Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodontics and dental traumatology[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(8):697-730.
[32] 胡珂, 陈智. 自制氢氧化钙糊剂与临床常用根管消毒剂抗菌效果及细胞毒性的实验室性能比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2010, 26(2):204-207.
[33] Ran SJ, He ZY, Liang JP. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis during alkaline stress: Changes in morphology, ultrastructure, physiochemical properties of the cell wall and specific gene transcripts[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2013, 58(11):1667-1676.
[34] Passos TF, Souza MT, Zanotto ED, et al. Bactericidal activity and biofilm inhibition of F18 bioactive glass against Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021, 118: 111475.
[35] Rusz M, del Favero G, El Abiead Y, et al. Morpho-metabotyping the oxidative stress response[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):15471.
[36] Ferraris S, Corazzari I, Turci F, et al. Antioxidant activity of silica-based bioactive glasses[J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2021, 7(6):2309-2316.
[37] Fang Z, Xu LZ, Lin YL, et al. The preservative potential of Octopus scraps peptides-Zinc chelate against Staphylococcus aureus: Its fabrication, antibacterial activity and action mode[J]. Food Control, 2019, 98: 24-33.
[38] 姚希燕, 唐晓宁, 王晓楠, 等. 无机抗菌材料抗菌机理研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(1):1105-1111.
[39] Bhattacharya P, Dey A, Neogi S. An insight into the mechanism of antibacterial activity by magnesium oxide nanoparticles[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2021, 9(26):5329-5339.
[40] Tsamesidis I, Kazeli K, Lymperaki E, et al. Effect of sintering temperature of bioactive glass nanoceramics on the hemolytic activity and oxidative stress biomarkers in erythrocytes[J]. Cell Mol Bioeng, 2020, 13(3):201-218.
[41] Benarroch JM, Asally M. The microbiologist's guide to membrane potential dynamics[J]. Trends Microbiol, 2020, 28(4):304-314.
[42] Guo F, Chen Q, Liang Q, et al. Antimicrobial activity and proposed action mechanism of linalool against Pseudomonas fluorescens[J]. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12: 562094.
[43] Kung C, Martinac B, Sukharev S. Mechanosensitive channels in microbes[J]. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2010, 64: 313-329.
[44] Zehnder M, Luder HU, Schätzle M, et al. A comparative study on the disinfection potentials of bioactive glass S53P4 and calcium hydroxide in contra-lateral human premolars ex vivo[J]. Int Endod J, 2006, 39(12):952-958.
[45] Priante G, Gianesello L, Ceol M,et al. Cell death in the kidney[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(14):E3598.
[46] Kargozar S, Montazerian M, Hamzehlou S, et al. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: Promising platforms for antibacterial strategies[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 81: 1-19.
[47] Schumacher M, Habibovic P, van Rijt S. Mesoporous bioactive glass composition effects on degradation and bioactivity[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6(7):1921-1931.
[48] 谢宗平, 张长青. 生物玻璃及其抗感染应用[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2007, 28(6):369-370,386.
[49] Miyaji H, Mayumi K, Miyata S, et al. Comparative biological assessments of endodontic root canal sealer containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler or silica filler[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(2):287-294.
[50] Ismail HS, Ali AI, Abo El-Ella MA, et al. Effect of different polishing techniques on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of three glass ionomer-based restorative materials:In vitro study[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2020, 12(7):e620-e625.
[51] 闫昱文, 许涛, 徐大可, 等. D-氨基酸对细菌生物膜分散作用的研究进展[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2021, 14(1):115-117.
[52] 王梦婷,许玉婷,陈亚明.生物活性玻璃对3种细菌和龈下早期混合菌斑抗菌效果的研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2015, 35(5):354-358.
[53] Korkut E, Torlak E, Altunsoy M. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of dental resin composite containing bioactive glass[J]. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater, 2016, 14(3):e296-e301.
[54] 许晓, 马骞, 陈亚明. PLGA/HA/生物活性玻璃复合膜的制备及抗菌性能研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2018, 38(7):612-617.

Antibacterial mechanism and influencing factors of bioactive glasses

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Study on oxidative stress antibacterial mechanism of rare earth nanocomposites Ce/Ag/ZnO against saccharomyces albicans [J]. , 2021, 41(10): 878-882.
[2]	. Application and research progress of antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles in medicine [J]. , 2017, 37(11): 1045-1048.
[3]	. Antibacterial mechanism and influencing factors of photocatalytic nano-titanium dioxide materials [J]. , 2017, 37(1): 81-84.