牙槽嵴即刻修复术在美学区缺损骨组织即刻种植中的临床研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2026.09.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To investigate and evaluate the clinical efficacy of immediate alveolar ridge reconstruction for tissue defects in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Methods Thirty patients undergoing immediate implant placement and restoration of maxillary anterior teeth at the Department of Prosthodontics, Changsha Stomatological Hospital, between June 2021 and June 2023 were enrolled. They were divided into an intact group (with intact labial bone walls) and a defect group (with three-wall bone defects, buccal bone plate defect≤6 mm, not exceeding 1/2 of the root length). Both groups received guided implant placement with the implant neck platform positioned 3-4 mm apical to the labial gingival margin. In the intact group, Geistlich Bio-Oss^® bone graft was placed in the jumping gap, while the defect group received corticocancellous bilayer grafts harvested from the maxillary tuberosity or three-layer connective tissue grafts fixed at the labial defect site. The jumping gap in the defect group was filled with a 1∶1 mixture of Geistlich Bio-Oss^® and autogenous bone particles. Immediate provisionalization was performed in both groups. Permanent restoration was performed 6 months post-surgery. Implant survival rate at 6 months after final restoration was recorded. The pink esthetic score (PES) was assessed immediately post-surgery and at 6 months after final restoration. Alveolar ridge dimensional changes and the width of the buccal bone plate around the implants were measured. Results Implant survival rates were 100% in both groups. Immediately post-surgery, scores for mesial papilla, distal papilla, gingival contour, gingival height, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). However, the alveolar process deficiency score and total PES score were significantly higher in the intact group compared to the defect group (P<0.05). At 6 months after final restoration, all indicator scores and the total PES score were comparable between the two groups, with no significant differences (P>0.05). Both groups demonstrated bone resorption at sites W1-W5 between immediate and 6-month evaluations. Significant resorption differences were observed at W1, W2, and W3 (P<0.05), while W4 and W5 showed no significant changes (P>0.05). Labial bone width and variation at sites P1 and P2 showed no inter-group differences at any time point (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared to immediate implant placement in cases with intact labial bone walls, immediate alveolar ridge reconstruction effectively restores labial bone defects and achieves satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Key words: immediate alveolar ridge reconstruction, immediate implant placement and provisionalization, buccal bone plate defect

CLC Number:

R783.4

LI Ke, GUO Sheng, ZHOU Jing, SUN Wei, LIU Yao. Clinical study of immediate alveolar ridge reconstruction in immediate implant in the esthetic area[J]. Stomatology, 2026, 46(9): 690-695.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

References 26

[1]	Kakar A, Kakar K, Leventis MD, et al. Immediate implant placement in infected sockets: A consecutive cohort study[J]. J Lasers Med Sci, 2020, 11(2): 167-173. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.28 pmid: 32273958
[2]	Slagter KW, Meijer HJA, Hentenaar DFM, et al. Immediate single-tooth implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation in bony defect sites in the esthetic region: A 5-year randomized controlled trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(12): 1738-1748. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0845 pmid: 33724473
[3]	Staas TA, Groenendijk E, Bronkhorst E, et al. Does initial buccal crest thickness affect final buccal crest thickness after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization: A prospective cone beam computed tomogram cohort study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2022, 24(1): 24-33. doi: 10.1111/cid.v24.1
[4]	Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM, De Bruyn H. Predictors of inter-proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A multivariate analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2012, 39(9): 895-903. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01921.x pmid: 22780557
[5]	Rosa JC, Rosa AC, Francischone CE, et al. Esthetic outcomes and tissue stability of implant placement in compromised sockets following immediate dentoalveolar restoration: Results of a prospective case series at 58 months follow-up[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2014, 34(2): 199-208. doi: 10.11607/prd.1858 pmid: 24600656
[6]	Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, et al. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1): 197-212. doi: 10.1111/prd.12212 pmid: 29478284
[7]	Tirone F, Genovesi F. Immediate implant placement and loading in the esthetic area when the buccal socket wall is significantly damaged[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2021, 33(4): 542-549. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12707 pmid: 33410593
[8]	Liu RZ, Yang Z, Tan JG, et al. Immediate implant placement for a single anterior maxillary tooth with a facial bone wall defect: A prospective clinical study with a one-year follow-up period[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(6): 1164-1174. doi: 10.1111/cid.2019.v21.6
[9]	da Rosa JC, Rosa AC, da Rosa DM, et al. Immediate dentoalveolar restoration of compromised sockets: A novel technique[J]. Eur J Esthet Dent, 2013, 8(3): 432-443. pmid: 23957042
[10]	da Rosa JCM, Rosa AC, Fadanelli MA, et al. Immediate implant placement, reconstruction of compromised sockets, and repair of gingival recession with a triple graft from the maxillary tuberosity: A variation of the immediate dentoalveolar restoration technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(4): 717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.020 pmid: 24939252
[11]	Rosa AC, Francischone CE, Cardoso MD, et al. Post-traumatic treatment of maxillary incisors by immediate dentoalveolar restoration with long-term follow-up[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2015, 36(2): 130-134. pmid: 25822639
[12]	Franceschi RL, Drechsel L, Schuldt Filho G. Application of immediate dentoalveolar restoration in alveolus compromised with loss of immediate implant in esthetic area[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2018, 2018: 1672170.
[13]	da Rosa JCM, Pértile deOliveira Rosa AC, Huwais S. Use of the immediate dentoalveolar restoration technique combined with osseodensification in periodontally compromised extraction sites[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2019, 39(4): 527-534. doi: 10.11607/prd.3883 pmid: 31226191
[14]	Zaninovich M, da Rosa JCM, Drago C. Immediate dentoalveolar restoration (IDR) of central maxillary incisor using sinus lateral wall block graft to regenerate loss of facial and palatal bone: Literature review and 1 year follow-up[J]. J Prosthodont, 2024, 33(7): 619-625. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13825 pmid: 38305647
[15]	Chappuis V, Martin W. ITI treatment guide volume 10 implant therapy in the esthetic zone: Current treatment modalities and materials for single-tooth replacement[M]. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, 2017.
[16]	Meijer HJA, Slagter KW, Vissink A, et al. Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the maxillary anterior region with large bony defects at time of immediate implant placement: A 1-year cohort study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(1): 73-79. doi: 10.1111/cid.2019.21.issue-1
[17]	林仁杰, 戴安娜, 汪淑华, 等. 拔牙后牙槽窝骨组织改建及其影响因素的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2025, 45(7): 540-545.
[18]	Merli M, Merli M, Mariotti G, et al. Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: A 10-year randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(5): 621-629. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13279 pmid: 32144803
[19]	Jung RE, Ioannidis A, Hämmerle CHF, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1): 165-175. doi: 10.1111/prd.12209 pmid: 29484712
[20]	Zhao BD, Xu H, Wang WX, et al. Single immediate implant placement into anterior maxillary sockets with facial bone defects: A 5-year retrospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2023, 38(2): 374-380. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10160 pmid: 37083918
[21]	Pohl V, Fürhauser L, Haas R, et al. Gingival recession behavior with immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla with buccal dehiscence without additional augmentation: A pilot study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(4): 1455-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03176-5
[22]	Mizuno K, Nakano T, Shimomoto T, et al. The efficacy of immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla with dehiscence in the facial alveolar bone: A case series[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2022, 24(1): 72-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.v24.1
[23]	Qian SJ, Pu YP, Zhang XM, et al. Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic evaluation of immediate implant placement with buccal bone dehiscence in the anterior maxilla: A 1-year prospective case series[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2023, 25(1): 3-10. doi: 10.1111/cid.v25.1
[24]	刘泉, 莫安春, 常晓杰, 等. 唇/颊侧骨板缺损区行不翻瓣即刻种植的临床病例系列研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2020, 34(1): 5-9.
[25]	布麦热姆·伊敏江, 王玲. 上颌窦穿孔修补术的研究进展[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2025, 26(3): 227-234.
[26]	Moussa NT, Dym H. Maxillofacial bone grafting materials[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2020, 64(2): 473-490. doi: S0011-8532(19)30111-9 pmid: 32111281

组别	n	近中龈乳头		远中龈乳头		牙龈曲线		牙龈高度		牙槽突缺损		软组织颜色		软组织质地		PES总分
组别	n	前	后	前	后	前	后	前	后	前	后	前	后	前	后	前	后
完整组	15	2(1,2)	1(1,2)	1(1,1)	1(1,1)	2(1,2)	2(1,2)	2(1,2)	1(1,2)	2(2,2)	1(1,1)	2(2,2)	2(1,2)	2(2,2)	2(1,2)	12(11,12)	10(8,10)
缺损组	15	2(2,2)	1(1,2)	1(1,2)	1(1,1)	2(1,2)	1(1,1)	1(1,2)	1(1,2)	1(1,1)	1(1,1)	2(2,2)	2(2,2)	1(1,2)	1(1,2)	11(10,12)	9(8,11)
Z		-1.445	0.000	-1.175	-0.598	-1.117	-1.862	-0.720	-0.392	-5.385	0.000	-1.795	-1.273	-1.862	-0.720	-2.255	-0.685
P		0.148	1.000	0.240	0.550	0.264	0.063	0.472	0.695	0.000	1.000	0.073	0.203	0.063	0.472	0.024	0.494

组别	n	W1	W2	W3	W4	W5
完整组	15	0.73±0.13	0.70±0.12	0.68±0.16	0.57±0.13	0.54±0.15
缺损组	15	0.84±0.14	0.88±0.12	0.88±0.12	0.69±0.19	0.58±0.16
t		-2.200	-4.100	-3.784	-1.992	-0.759
P		0.036	0.000	0.001	0.056	0.454

组别	n	即刻修复		修复后6个月		唇侧骨板变化
组别	n	P1	P2	P1	P2	P1	P2
完整组	15	3.02±0.29	2.77±0.43	2.11±0.18	2.19±0.43	0.91±0.28	0.58±0.09
缺损组	15	3.03±0.47	3.15±0.84	2.03±0.58	2.57±0.75	1.00±0.47	0.58±0.15
t		-0.032	-1.557	0.528	-1.701	-0.625	-0.072
P		0.974	0.135	0.604	0.103	0.537	0.943

Clinical study of immediate alveolar ridge reconstruction in immediate implant in the esthetic area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 26

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHEN Tinglan, CAO Zepeng, SUN Zhongyi, NI Jing. Simultaneous hard and soft tissue augmentation for peri-implant soft tissue defects: A case report [J]. Stomatology, 2026, 46(8): 613-618.
[2]	GUO An, LUO Yushang, WANG Qing. Application of CBCT in infrared optical positioning dynamic navigation technology [J]. Stomatology, 2026, 46(6): 476-480.
[3]	ZHANG Chao, YANG Ting, HAN Li, FU Haoxuan, MAO Zhouhong, TANG Wanrong. Analysis of the clinical application effect of digital impressions for edentulous maxilla based on a line-segmented zigzag scanning strategy [J]. Stomatology, 2026, 46(6): 435-441.
[4]	BI Mengfei, DAI Shuyue, CHEN Jian, ZHOU Yiyi, SHEN Ming. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary anterior implant-supported restorations with different palatal cervical bone plate thicknesses under traumatic loading [J]. Stomatology, 2026, 46(5): 344-349.
[5]	LUO Jiatong, YANG Jiakang, WANG Baixiang. Advances in the use of the socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement in the aesthetic zone [J]. Stomatology, 2026, 46(1): 76-80.
[6]	WANG Zhongyi, WU Jiacheng, YU Haiyang. Fixed-removable simultaneous prosthetic strategy based on target restoration space theory and its application in senior patients: A clinical study [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(12): 932-939.
[7]	QIAN Yi, YANG Yi, BI Xiaoming, XU Jiya, WANG Zhifang, WANG Yueqiu, LIU Mei. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported prostheses and natural adjacent teeth in the aesthetic zone under different occlusal relationships [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(12): 895-900.
[8]	TANG Chunbo, SHEN Yue. Advances in the clinical application of immediate loading with provisional prostheses in edentulous patients [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(12): 881-886.
[9]	BAO Siqi, CHEN Long, NI Jie, SI Misi. Research progress of factors affecting postoperative contraction of peri-implant free gingival grafts [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(10): 783-788.
[10]	DOU Chenyun, SHEN Wenjing, WANG Jinmei, LI Beibei, ZHEN Penglong, MENG Lingqiang. Analysis of different implant implantation methods and changes of alveolar crest vertical membrane thickness [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(8): 603-607.
[11]	ZHANG Xinyue, WANG Yinlin, WANG Baixiang, WANG Huiming. Advances in the assessment of the effectiveness of immediate restorative techniques with full arch implants [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(8): 631-636.
[12]	LIU Yuhan, MENG Weiyan. Formation of biofilm on implant surfaces and its impact on implant homeostasis [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(8): 637-640.
[13]	LI Feifan, WU Meiqi, BI Mengfei, SHEN Ming. Finite element study on the stress of hole sealing resin in screw approach of dental implant [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(6): 401-405.
[14]	RUNG Sheng’an, QU Yili, YANG Xingmei. Risk factors and treatment strategies for reimplantation after removal of failed dental implants [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(4): 301-305.
[15]	LIU Zihua, BU Lingtong, WU Mengxuan, XU Guangzhou. Digital implant guides in full-mouth implant surgery and restoration: A progress review [J]. Stomatology, 2025, 45(3): 161-167.