三维影像重叠在正畸中的研究进展及临床应用

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.10.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对同一对象不同时间点颅颌面组织结构进行影像学资料重叠分析,是颅颌面生长发育研究、正畸治疗及正颌手术治疗疗效评估的重要方法。三维影像技术克服传统二维影像常见缺点的同时,提供了更全面的颅面部信息以及更精准的牙齿和骨骼数据。因此,越来越多的学者验证并探索三维影像重叠技术应用于临床的可靠性和准确性。本文从三维影像数据源、重叠方法及临床应用等方面进行了综述,以期为正畸领域三维影像重叠技术提供科研及临床指导。

关键词: 三维影像重叠, 重叠方法, 评价方式, 疗效评价

Abstract:

The superimposition analysis of imaging data on the structure of craniomaxillofacial tissue at different time points of the same object is an important method for studying craniomaxillofacial growth and development, evaluating the efficacy of orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. While overcoming the common shortcomings of traditional 2D imaging, 3D image superimposition provides more comprehensive craniomaxillofacial information and more accurate dental and bone data. Therefore, more and more scholars are validating and exploring the reliability and accuracy of 3D superimposition technology for clinical applications. This article reviews the 3D image data sources, superimposition methods, and clinical applications, to provide scientific research and clinical guidance for 3D image superimposition technology in orthodontics.

Key words: 3D image superimposition, superimposition method, evaluation method, efficacy evaluation

中图分类号:

R783.5

向雨林, 梁颖, 郑之峻. 三维影像重叠在正畸中的研究进展及临床应用[J]. 口腔医学, 2024, 44(10): 796-800.

XIANG Yulin, LIANG Ying, ZHENG Zhijun. Research progress and clinical application of 3D image superimposition in orthodontics[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(10): 796-800.

参考文献 45

[1]	Cevidanes LHS, Bailey LJ, Tucker SF, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 131(1): 44-50.
[2]	Bollen AM. Cephalometry in orthodontics: 2D and 3D[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2019, 156(1): 161.
[3]	Ghoneima A, Cho H, Farouk K, et al. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2017, 20(4): 227-236. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12205 pmid: 28960842
[4]	Koerich L, Burns D, Weissheimer A, et al. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: A validation study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45(5): 662-669.
[5]	Hayashi K, Chung O, Park S, et al. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(3): 373-380.
[6]	Yoon JH, Yu HS, Choi Y, et al. Model analysis of digital models in moderate to severe crowding: In vivo validation and clinical application[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 8414605.
[7]	Chen J, Li SN, Fang S. Quantification of tooth displacement from cone-beam computed tomography images[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136(3): 393-400.
[8]	Lim SW, Hwang HS, Cho IS, et al. Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 157(3): 348-356.
[9]	Park JH, Hwang CJ, Choi YJ, et al. Registration of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images using 3-dimensional planning software: Comparison of the accuracy according to scanning methods and software[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 157(6): 843-851.
[10]	Cevidanes LHC, Heymann G, Cornelis MA, et al. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136(1): 94-99.
[11]	Weissheimer A, Menezes LM, Koerich L, et al. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(9): 1188-1196.
[12]	de Oliveira Ruellas AC, Huanca GhislanzoniLT, Gomes MR, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 149(4): 533-542.
[13]	Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, Souki BQ, et al. 3D mandibular superimposition: Comparison of regions of reference for voxel-based registration[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(6): e0157625.
[14]	Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Franchi L, et al. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(5): 747-754.
[15]	Chen G, Al Awadi M, Chambers DW, et al. The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1): 153. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01142-2 pmid: 32460733
[16]	Lysell L. Plicae palatinaetransversae and papilla incisiva in man: A morphologic and genetic study[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1955, 13(Suppl. 18): 5-137.
[17]	Thiruvenkatachari B, Al-Abdallah M, Akram NC, et al. Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(4): 480-485.
[18]	Saadeh M, Macari A, Haddad R, et al. Instability of palatal rugae following rapid maxillary expansion[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2017, 39(5): 474-481.
[19]	Hoggan BR, Sadowsky C. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119(5): 482-488.
[20]	Liu J, Koh KM, Choi SH, et al. Validation of three-dimensional digital model superimpositions based on palatal structures in patients with maximum anterior tooth retraction following premolar extraction[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2022, 52(4): 258-267. doi: 10.4041/kjod21.126 pmid: 35875849
[21]	Jang I, Tanaka M, Koga Y, et al. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(3): 447-453. doi: 10.2319/042308-225.1 pmid: 19413387
[22]	Talaat S, Kaboudan A, Bourauel C, et al. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional palatal superimposition of digital dental models[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2017, 39(4): 365-370.
[23]	Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D, et al. Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 5838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06013-5 pmid: 28724930
[24]	Charalampakis O, Iliadi A, Ueno H, et al. Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2018, 154(1): 47-54.
[25]	An K, Jang I, Choi DS, et al. Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2015, 76(6): 508-519. doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0310-8 pmid: 26250456
[26]	García-García AS, Martínez-González JM, Gómez-Font R, et al. Current status of the torus palatinus and torus mandibularis[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal, 2010, 15(2): e353-e360.
[27]	Ioshida M, Muñoz BA, Rios H, et al. Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model registration with use of the mucogingival junction as the reference[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2019, 127(4): 351-360.
[28]	Oueiss A, Camia J, Masucci C, et al. Exploring the mylohyoid area as a reference for three-dimensional digital mandibular superimposition[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 123(6): 672-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.07.016 pmid: 35907610
[29]	Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I, et al. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models[J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80(4): 497-503.
[30]	Lin L, Li CS, Chen SH, et al. Transverse growth of the mandibular body in untreated children: A longitudinal CBCT study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2023, 27(5): 2097-2107.
[31]	Bilello G, Fazio M, Amato E, et al. Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: A prospective observational study[J]. Prog Orthod, 2022, 23(1): 12. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00406-7 pmid: 35399128
[32]	Castroflorio T, Sedran A, Parrini S, et al. Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: Effect of treatment design[J]. Prog Orthod, 2023, 24(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00453-0 pmid: 36642743
[33]	Murphy SJ, Lee S, Scharm JC, et al. Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth movement between Invisalign and fixed appliances[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2023, 164(1): 24-33.
[34]	Impellizzeri A, Horodynski M, De Stefano A, et al. CBCT and intra-oral scanner: The advantages of 3D technologies in orthodontic treatment[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(24): 9428.
[35]	Taylor KL, Evangelista K, Muniz L, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2020, 23(1): 72-81. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12345 pmid: 31514261
[36]	Choi EH A, Lee KJ, Choi SH, et al. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion based on the length of the miniscrew: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2023, 93(4): 390-397.
[37]	宋欣羽, 钱玉芬. 正畸治疗对颞下颌关节影响的锥形束CT研究进展[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2021, 14(4): 482-487.
[38]	Yildirim E, Karacay S, Erkan M. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Angle Orthod, 2014, 84(6): 1018-1025. doi: 10.2319/112713-869.1 pmid: 24713070
[39]	Wei RY, Atresh A, Ruellas A, et al. Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class Ⅱ elastics[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 158(4): 505-517.e6.
[40]	Vilefort PLC, Farah LO, Gontijo HP, et al. Condyle-glenoid fossa relationship after Herbst appliance treatment during two stages of craniofacial skeletal maturation: A retrospective study[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2019, 22(4): 345-353. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12338 pmid: 31419375
[41]	Ying XW, Tian KY, Zhang KY, et al. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 529. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01892-7 pmid: 34654418
[42]	Han YS, Jung YE, Song IS, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joint stability after orthognathic surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74(7): 1454-1462.
[43]	Wang H, Minnema J, Batenburg KJ, et al. Multiclass CBCT image segmentation for orthodontics with deep learning[J]. J Dent Res, 2021, 100(9): 943-949.
[44]	Wu TH, Lian CF, Lee S, et al. Two-stage mesh deep learning for automated tooth segmentation and landmark localization on 3D intraoral scans[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2022, 41(11): 3158-3166.
[45]	Dolatabadi N, Boyd RL, Oh H. Comparison between a human judge and automatic landmark identification on digital models[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 162(2): 257-263.