不同方法对口腔前庭沟深度测量的一致性研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2023.06.006

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To study the consistencyamong four methods for measuring oral vestibular groove depth (OVGD). Methods Sixteen subjects were selected, and four measuring methods were used:silicone rubber mold measurement(SMM), alginate mold measurement(AMM), intra-oral direct measurement(IDM), and oral scan measurement(OSM). Three examiners(A, B, C)measured the vestibular groove depth of 16, 14, 11, 46, 44, and 41 tooth positions respectively. Results The consistency among the three examiners was nearly perfect(ICC=0.87), and the consistency among the four measuring methods was moderate(ICC=0.49). Results of the four measuring methods were IDM>SMM>OSM>AMM from the largest to the smallest.Bland-Altman plots showed good consistency among examiners and poor consistency among measuring methods. Conclusion Among the four methods of measuring oral vestibular groove depth, examiners have little influence on the results, and the results obtained by different methods are different.

Key words: oral vestibular groove depth, measurement, consistency

CLC Number:

R322.41

WU Chunlan, HU Yue, WANG Tingting, YU Dedong, DENG Gang, LI Chaolun. The consistency studyon different methods of oral vestibular groove depth measurements[J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(6): 512-517.

Figures/Tables 5

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.3

References 23

[1]	Fallahi Motlagh M, Sadeghzade F, Abbaszadeh A. Lipswitchvestibuloplasty combined with endosseous implant surgery. One stage versus two stages?[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol, 2017, 29(1):33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2016.09.004
[2]	Cillo JE, Finn R. Reconstruction of the shallow vestibule edentulous mandible with simultaneous split thickness skin graft vestibuloplasty and mandibular endosseous implants for implant-supported overdentures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(2):381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.065
[3]	Lim HC, An SC, Lee DW. A retrospective comparison of three modalities for vestibuloplasty in the posterior mandible:Apically positioned flap only vs. free gingival graft vs. collagen matrix[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2018, 22(5):2121-2128. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2320-y
[4]	Arnoux JP, Papasotiriou A, Weisgold AS. A revised technique for stage-two surgery in the severely resorbed mandible:A technical note[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998, 13(4):565-568.
[5]	Melo LGN, Almeida ALPF, Lopes JFS, et al. A modified approach for vestibuloplasty in severely resorbed mandible using an implant-retained postoperative stent:A case report[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology, 2008, 106(4):e7-e14.
[6]	Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA, et al. Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery:A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2016, 20(7):1369-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2 pmid: 27041111
[7]	Wei DH, Di P, Tian JH, et al. Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone:Accuracy outcomes[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2020, 24(4):1401-1410. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03105-6
[8]	Fageeh HN, Meshni AA, Jamal HA, et al. The accuracy and reliability of digital measurements of gingival recession versus conventional methods[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0851-0 pmid: 31311544
[9]	Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J]. Biometrics, 1977, 33(1):159-174. pmid: 843571
[10]	乔舰. 组内相关系数的理论基础及建模应用[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2016, 31(11):44-48.
[11]	Giavarina D. Understanding bland Altman analysis[J]. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 2015, 25(2):141-151. doi: 10.11613/issn.1846-7482
[12]	Smith MW, Ma J, Stafford RS. Bar charts enhance Bland-Altman plots when value ranges are limited[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(2):180-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.001 pmid: 19716265
[13]	Kothiwale S, Ajbani J. Innovative use of increasing the width of attached gingiva using chorion membrane along with platelet rich fibrin membrane[J]. Cell Tissue Bank, 2021, 22(3):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s10561-020-09884-7 pmid: 33231839
[14]	Thoma DS, Buranawat B, Hämmerle CHF, et al. Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas:A systematic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014, 41(Suppl 15):S77-S91. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12220
[15]	Blasi G, Monje A, Muñoz-Peñalver J, et al. Influence of vestibular depth on the outcomes of root coverage therapy:A prospective case series study[J]. J Periodontol, 2022, 93(12):1857-1866. doi: 10.1002/jper.v93.12
[16]	Speroni S, Cicciu M, Maridati P, et al. Clinical investigation of mucosal thickness stability after soft tissue grafting around implants:A 3-year retrospective study[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2010, 21(4):474-479. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.74208
[17]	Bawankar PV, Kolte AP, Kolte RA. Peri-implant soft tissue stability through vestibular extension procedure:A retrospective study[J]. Quintessence Int, 2022, 53(3):226-235.
[18]	陈卉. Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2007, 24(3):308-309, 315.
[19]	倪平, 陈卉, 涂娇, 等. 基于Bland-Altman法对定量资料的一致性评价及其SAS宏实现[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2014, 19(8):898-903.
[20]	Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Zarone F, Discepoli N, et al. Analysis of the reproducibility of subgingival vertical margins using intraoral optical scanning (IOS):A randomized controlled pilot trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(5):941. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050941
[21]	Thoma DS, Lim HC, Paeng KW, et al. Augmentation of keratinized tissue at tooth and implant sites by using autogenous grafts and collagen-based soft-tissue substitutes[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(1):64-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13194 pmid: 31518443
[22]	万蕾蕾, 马静雯, 张纪春, 等. 游离龈移植术后龈瓣收缩效果的临床研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2019, 19(5):876-879, 950.
[23]	Golmayo P, Barallat L, Losada M, et al. Keratinized tissue gain after free gingival graft augmentation procedures around teeth and dental implants:A prospective observational study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021, 48(2):302-314. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13394 pmid: 33098670

检查者	测量方法	均值	标准差	标准误
A	SMM(n=96)	8.86	2.37	0.24
	AMM(n=96)	8.02	1.90	0.19
	IDM(n=96)	9.11	2.17	0.22
	OSM(n=96)	8.31	2.36	0.24
B	SMM(n=96)	8.81	2.35	0.24
	AMM(n=96)	8.05	1.88	0.19
	IDM(n=96)	9.29	2.25	0.23
	OSM(n=96)	8.30	2.31	0.24
C	SMM(n=96)	8.89	2.34	0.24
	AMM(n=96)	7.99	1.90	0.19
	IDM(n=96)	9.12	1.97	0.20
	OSM(n=96)	8.29	2.36	0.24
A总(n=384)		8.57	2.24	0.11
B总(n=384)		8.36	2.23	0.11
C总(n=384)		8.57	2.19	0.11
SMM总(n=288)		8.85	2.34	0.14
AMM总(n=288)		8.02	1.89	0.11
IDM总(n=288)		9.17	2.12	0.13
OSM总(n=288)		8.30	2.14	0.14

检查者	测量方法	ICC	95%CI	检查者	测量方法	ICC	95%CI
A	SMM(n=96)	0.47	0.36~0.57	SMM	A(n=96)	0.99	0.98~0.99
	AMM(n=96)				B(n=96)
	IDM(n=96)				C(n=96)
	0SM(n=96)			AMM	A(n=96)	0.99	0.99~0.99
B	SMM(n=96)	0.49	0.38~0.60		B(n=96)
	SMM(n=96)				C(n=96)
	AMM(n=96)				C(n=96)
	AMM(n=96)			IDM	A(n=96)	0.80	0.74~0.86
	IDM(n=96)				A(n=96)
	IDM(n=96)				B(n=96)
	OSM(n=96)				B(n=96)
	OSM(n=96)				C(n=96)
C	SMM(n=96)	0.51	0.41~0.61		C(n=96)
	SMM(n=96)			OSM	A(n=96)	0.99	0.99~0.99
	AMM(n=96)				A(n=96)
	AMM(n=96)				B(n=96)
	IDM(n=96)				B(n=96)
	IDM(n=96)				C(n=96)
	OSM(n=96)				C(n=96)
	OSM(n=96)			所有检查者一致性		0.87	0.84~0.89
所有测量方法一致性		0.49	0.43~0.55	所有检查者一致性		0.87	0.84~0.89

项目	95%置信区间下限/mm	95%置信区间上限/mm	偏倚
检查者
B-A	-0.94	0.84	-0.05
C-B	-0.63	0.78	0.07
C-A	-0.78	0.72	0.03
检测方法
AMM-SMM	-5.01	3.32	-0.84
IDM-SMM	-3.28	3.78	0.25
OSM-SMM	-5.38	4.28	-0.55
IDM-AMM	-3.14	5.32	1.09
OSM-AMM	-4.27	4.86	0.29
IDM-OSM	-4.46	6.05	0.80

The consistency studyon different methods of oral vestibular groove depth measurements

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WU Lina, XIONG Xin, WU Yange, ZHANG Qinlanhui, WANG Jun. Relationship between congenital absence of third molars and craniomaxillofacial structure [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(1): 57-61.
[2]	LI Yusheng, FAN Wei, LI Dandan, WANG Zhendong. Three-dimensional digital measurement and analysis of maxillary arches of unilateral complete cleft lip-and-palate newborns [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(7): 631-636.
[3]	. Establishment of 127 indexes of permanent dentition cephalometric norm [J]. , 2021, 41(9): 797-804.
[4]	. A preliminary study on the common indexes of the CBCT 3D cephalometric analysis [J]. , 2021, 41(8): 720-723.
[5]	. An accuracy study of a clinical method to identify transverse occlusal cant based on the pupil midpoint [J]. , 2020, 40(7): 624-629.
[6]	Shui-Yi Shao. Application and error analysis of implant reference method in measurement of posterior teeth region in the panoramic radiograph [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 214-217.
[7]	. Accuracy of the cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs for measurement of tooth length by different doctors [J]. , 2019, 39(11): 1038-1041.
[8]	. Relationship between the depth of the curve of Spee and dental arch morphology [J]. , 2018, 38(7): 632-635.
[9]	. Linear measurement and morphological analysis of sella turcica [J]. , 2017, 37(4): 341-345.
[10]	. Observation of the effect of the integrated testing items in the dental licensure exam [J]. , 2016, 36(7): 635-644.
[11]	. Measurement and research of the Monson’s spherical radius of healthy young adults in Chengdu [J]. , 2016, 36(2): 146-149.
[12]	. Sella turcica morphology of 3~24 year-old patients by orthodontic treatment in northeast of China [J]. , 2016, 36(12): 1104-1107.
[13]	. Threedimensional evaluation of orthognathic operation on the maxillofacial hard tissue symmetry change [J]. , 2015, 35(4): 262-265.
[14]	. Spiral computed tomography based threedimensional analysis of mandibular asymmetry in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate [J]. , 2015, 35(4): 274-277.
[15]	. Comparison between CBCT and plaster models in measuring dental arches [J]. , 2015, 35(10): 834-837.