Er:YAG激光处理牙釉质后对粘接性能影响的研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2023.09.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of different power of Er:YAG laser on bonding performance of tooth enamel. Methods One hundred and forty-four first molars were selected and randomly divided into three groups: A, B and C, with 48 in each group. Each group of A, B and C was divided into 6 subgroups (n=8), and the treated enamel surface was irradiated with 6 different power lasers, namely 0, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 W. Group A was calculated by three-point bending test for the large positive stress and the maximum shear stress; group B was measured by the Owens two-liquid method; group C was measured by the nano-indenter for the elastic modulus and hardness. Results The maximum normal stress and maximum shear stress of A4 (5 W) were the largest (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between A3 (4 W) and A4 (5 W) (P>0.05); B3 (4 W) had high surface energy value (P<0.05); the elastic modulus of C4 (5 W) was the highest (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference with C3 (4 W) (P>0.05); C3 (4 W) had the highest hardness value (P<0.05). Conclusion Two laser parameters of 4 W, 20 Hz, 200 mJ and 5 W, 20 Hz and 250 mJ show good bonding properties (total stress, table Energy, modulus of elasticity and hardness), and can be used to enhance the bonding effect of enamel surface treatment.

Key words: Er:YAG laser, enamel, bonding, surface energy, nano-indentation

CLC Number:

R781.05

YU Jinyu, CHE Shun, GUO Wei. Study on the effect of Er:YAG laser on bonding performance of tooth enamel[J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(9): 786-790.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.2

Fig.3

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 24

[1]	Jiang T, Gong Q, Liu Y, et al. Effect of erbium family laser etching on shear bond strength of enamel surfaces:A meta-analysis-PRISMA[J]. Medicine, 2022, 101(40):e30990. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030990
[2]	Labunet A, Tonea A, Kui A, et al. The use of laser energy for etching enamel surfaces in dentistry-a scoping review[J]. Materials(Basel), 2022, 15(6):1988.
[3]	Zheng XW, Zhao Y, Tang L, et al. A comparison between phosphoric acid- and Er:YAG laser-mediated re-etching of enamel for orthodontic bracket re-bonding[J]. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg, 2021, 39(12):789-794.
[4]	Önöral Ö, Ongun S, Günal B. Evaluation of surface characteriz-ation and mechanical features of resin-matrix ceramics before and after different surface treatments[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 127(6):928.e1-928928. e8.
[5]	宋丹丹, 方慧敏, 曹阳, 等. Er∶YAG激光预备对牙釉质表面性能及树脂粘结强度的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(1):38-41. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.01.009
[6]	郑小婉, 秦璐, 张冠民, 等. Er∶YAG激光蚀刻牙釉质黏接效能的实验研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2016, 37(3):286-293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2016.03.007
[7]	Liber-Kneć A, Łagan S. Surface testing of dental biomaterials-determination of contact angle and surface free energy[J]. Materials(Basel), 2021, 14(11):2716.
[8]	Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers[J]. J Appl Polym Sci, 1969, 13(8):1741-1747. doi: 10.1002/app.1969.070130815
[9]	Nagura Y, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, et al. Relationship between enamel bond fatigue durability and surface free-energy characteristics with universal adhesives[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2018, 126(2):135-145. doi: 10.1111/eos.12398 pmid: 29344991
[10]	Niu HJ, Fan F, Wang R, et al. Elastic properties measurement of human enamel based on resonant ultrasound spectroscopy[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019, 89:48-53. doi: S1751-6161(18)30907-X pmid: 30261480
[11]	Springall GAC, Yin L. Nano-scale mechanical behavior of pre-crystallized CAD/CAM zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018, 82:35-44. doi: S1751-6161(18)30275-3 pmid: 29567528
[12]	朱丹, 龚仁国, 柯贤俊. 铒:钇铝石榴石激光处理技术对牙釉质再粘接强度的影响[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2019, 35(4):199-202.
[13]	Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces[J]. J Dent Res, 1955, 34(6):849-853. doi: 10.1177/00220345550340060801 pmid: 13271655
[14]	Mollabashi V, Rezaei-Soufi L, Farhadian M, et al. Effect of erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium, scandium, Gallium, and garnet and erbium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser etching on enamel demineralization and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2019, 10(2):263-268. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_495_18
[15]	Gere JM, Goodno BJ. 材料力学[M]. 王一军,译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2020.
[16]	Hass V, Abuna G, PinheiroFeitosa V, et al. Self-etching enamel bonding using acidic functional monomers with different-length carbon chains and hydrophilicity[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017, 19(6):497-505. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39565 pmid: 29234755
[17]	Xu Z, Xiong YH, Yu P, et al. Wear and damage at the bonded interface between tooth enamel and resin composite[J]. J Dent, 2019, 83:40-49. doi: S0300-5712(18)30348-8 pmid: 30797040
[18]	Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, et al. From buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(1):7-34. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994 pmid: 32030373
[19]	Ouchi H, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition layer of universal adhesives on enamel bond fatigue durability and interfacial characteristics with different etching modes[J]. Oper Dent, 2017, 42(6):636-645. doi: 10.2341/16-255-L pmid: 28976848
[20]	Curylofo-Zotti FA, Fernandes MP, Martins AA, et al. Caries removal with Er:YAG laser followed by dentin biomodification with carbodiimide and chitosan:Wettability and surface morphology analysis[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2020, 83(2):133-139. doi: 10.1002/jemt.v83.2
[21]	Chaurasia B, Tewari N, Mathur VP, et al. Evaluation of two rehydration protocols for fractured tooth fragments for characteristics of penetration of resin tags using confocal laser scanning microscopy[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2023, 39(2):157-164. doi: 10.1111/edt.v39.2
[22]	Katyal D, Subramanian AK, Venugopal A, et al. Assessment of wettability and contact angle of bonding agent with enamel surface etched by five commercially available etchants:An in vitro study[J]. Int J Dent, 2021, 2021:9457553.
[23]	Askeland DR. The Science and engineering of materials[J]. Mater Sci Eng A, 2006, 212(1):186-187. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10215-X
[24]	Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, et al. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(12):1586-1599. doi: S0109-5641(16)30461-4 pmid: 27720423

分组	激光功率/W	激光能量/mJ
A1, B1, C1	0	0
A2, B2, C2	3	150
A3, B3, C3	4	200
A4, B4, C4	5	250
A5, B5, C5	6	300
A6, B6, C6	7	350

分组	激光功率/W	n	最大正应力/MPa	最大切应力/MPa
A1	0	8	16.36±1.57	2.92±0.28
A2	3	8	20.15±3.75	3.60±0.67
A3	4	8	45.27±5.27	8.09±0.94
A4	5	8	48.42±3.41	8.65±0.61
A5	6	8	22.54±2.60	4.02±0.47
A6	7	8	22.45±2.17	4.01±0.39

分组	激光功率/W	n	表面能/(mJ·m^-2)
B1	0	8	37.026±0.657
B2	3	8	64.334±0.740
B3	4	8	72.061±0.808
B4	5	8	70.578±0.616
B5	6	8	63.421±0.718
B6	7	8	50.389±1.049

分组	激功率光/W	n	弹性模量/GPa	硬度/GPa
C1	0	8	78.228±13.652	2.348±0.785
C2	3	8	2.162±0.665	0.354±0.168
C3	4	8	9.543±1.729	0.434±0.127
C4	5	8	10.825±1.670	0.319±0.064
C5	6	8	3.021±0.412	0.096±0.023
C6	7	8	7.462±1.010	0.113±0.015

Study on the effect of Er:YAG laser on bonding performance of tooth enamel

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHAO Sijia, HE Xinyu, YU Yue, XUE Xiaowei, PAN Chong, ZHAO Jizhi. Study on the effect of Er:YAG laser irrigation on the root canal system with different mechanical preparation tapers [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(8): 673-678.
[2]	QU Chaojie,GUO Wei. The effect of smear layer removal after cleaning root canals in different length and curvature with Er: YAG laser irrigation [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(5): 427-433.
[3]	FENG Fan, LIU Xiaqing, LI Yadan, LIU Henan, QIAO Yuxuan, LI Ying. Research progress of Er: YAG laser pretreatment methods of post space [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(5): 467-470.
[4]	ZHANG Xudong, YANG Xuelian, LIU Xiaqing, MA Yufeng. Advances in research on the application of Er:YAG laser in oral hard tissues [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(4): 381-384.
[5]	TANG Zhenhang, CHEN Zhuo. Research progress of chitosan promoting enamel biomimetic mineralization [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(3): 256-260.
[6]	FENG Shanshan, JIN Yifu, CHEN Huan, HOU Yanyan, DING Jingyu, ZHU Song. Research progress on the application of antimicrobial peptides in dentin adhesives [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(2): 156-159.
[7]	SUN Weigui, LIU Fang, ZHANG Feimin. Influence of different surface treatments on the bonding strength of LAVA resin nano-ceramics [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(12): 1063-1066.
[8]	WANG Beibei, HAN Fei, YUAN Xiaojun, CHEN Chen, XIE Haifeng. Effects of myricetin on dentin remineralization and bonding strength [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(10): 865-868.
[9]	QIU Sainan, ZANG Ruijue, MEI Yufeng, ZHANG Xiaomin, CAO Ling, ZHOU Hongyan. Study on enamel in primary teeth treated with NaF-chitosan gel for demineralization [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(1): 68-71.
[10]	. Cleaning Methods of Saliva Contaminated-Zirconia [J]. , 2020, 40(3): 262-265.
[11]	. Advances of dentin primer [J]. , 2020, 40(2): 161-164.
[12]	. The effect of different instruments of interproximal enamel reduction(IER) on enamel surface roughness before and after polishing. [J]. , 2019, 39(9): 774-778.
[13]	. Developmental defect of enamel among children aged 3 to 5: an epidemiological investigation and associated factors [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 439-442.
[14]	. Research progress on surface treatment of CAD/CAM composite ceramic materials [J]. , 2019, 39(11): 1053-1056.
[15]	. Influence of deproteinization of sodium hypochlorite on shear bond strength of enamel：a meta-analysis [J]. , 2018, 38(9): 819-823.