种植修复数字化印模准确性影响因素的研究进展

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.03.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Digital impressions are accepted by clinicians and patients because of their many advantages such as convenience, speed, and improved patient comfort. In recent years, it has been continuously applied in various fields of prosthodontics. For inlays, single crowns and fixed bridges, digital impressions have shown good accuracy and clinical results, but the accuracy is still not ideal for long span implant restorations and complete denture restorations. In this paper, factors affecting digital impressions will be reviewed.

Key words: digital impression, intraoral scanner, implant dentistry, intraoral scan body, accuracy

CLC Number:

R783.2

WANG Han, HU Jian. Research progress of factors influencing the accuracy of digital impressions for implant restoration[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(3): 221-226.

Figures/Tables 2

References 43

[1]	Buzayan MM, Yunus NB. Passive fit in screw retained multi-unit implant prosthesis understanding and achieving: A review of the literature[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2014, 14(1):16-23. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0343-x
[2]	Albanchez-González MI, Brinkmann JCB, Peláez-Rico J, et al. Accuracy of digital dental implants impression taking with intraoral scanners compared with conventional impression techniques: A systematic review of in vitro studies[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(4):2026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042026
[3]	Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, et al. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: A comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(11):1360-1367. doi: 10.1111/clr.2017.28.issue-11
[4]	Mangano F, Veronesi G. Digital versus analog procedures for the prosthetic restoration of single implants: A randomized controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 5325032.
[5]	Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, et al. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020, 29(8):660-678. doi: 10.1111/jopr.v29.8
[6]	Huang RX, Liu YX, Huang BX, et al. Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: An in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01986-2
[7]	Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, et al. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(6):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016
[8]	Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, et al. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12527 pmid: 27483210
[9]	Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: A review to make a successful impression[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2017, 2017: 8427595.
[10]	Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2020, 64(2):109-113. doi: S1883-1958(19)30285-3 pmid: 31474576
[11]	包旭东, 岳林. 口内扫描仪临床扫描精度及影响因素把控[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(9):769-773.
[12]	Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2018, 31(4):375-376. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5781
[13]	Schmidt A, Schlenz MA, Liu HY, et al. The influence of hard- and software improvement of intraoral scanners on the implant transfer accuracy from 2012 to 2021: An in vitro study[J]. Appl Sci, 2021, 11(15):7166. doi: 10.3390/app11157166
[14]	Chen YM, Zhai ZH, Watanabe S, et al. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners[J]. J Dent, 2022, 124: 104220. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104220
[15]	王勇. 口内数字印模技术[J]. 口腔医学, 2015, 35(9):705-709,743.
[16]	Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Using intraoral scanning to capture complete denture impressions, tooth positions, and centric relation records[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2018, 31(4):377-381. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5741
[17]	Schmidt A, Billig JW, Schlenz MA, et al. The influence of using different types of scan bodies on the transfer accuracy of implant position: An in vitro study[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2021, 34(2):254-260. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6796
[18]	Kim RJY, Benic GI, Park JM. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(11):e0222070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222070
[19]	Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, et al. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner[J]. Quintessence Int, 2016, 47(4):343-349. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a35524 pmid: 26824085
[20]	Arcuri L, Pozzi A, Lio F, et al. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2020, 64(2):128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.001
[21]	Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, et al. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2018, 62(3):324-329. doi: S1883-1958(17)30141-X pmid: 29397353
[22]	Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, et al. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: A comparative in vitro study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1):101.
[23]	Miyoshi K, Tanaka S, Yokoyama S, et al. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(1):74-83.
[24]	Braian M, Wennerberg A. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 122(2):129-136. e2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.007
[25]	Tan MY, Yee SHX, Wong KM, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions: Effect of interimplant distance in an edentulous arch[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34(2):366-380. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6855
[26]	Thanasrisuebwong P, Kulchotirat T, Anunmana C. Effects of inter-implant distance on the accuracy of intraoral scanner: An in vitro study[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2021, 13(2):107-116. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.2.107 pmid: 34025959
[27]	Albayrak B, Korkmaz İH, Wee AG, et al. Assessing the effect of interimplant distance and angle on different impression techniques[J]. Machines, 2022, 10(5):293. doi: 10.3390/machines10050293
[28]	Abduo J, Palamara JEA. Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: An in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2021, 7(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00355-6
[29]	Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, et al. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: Accuracy outcomes[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(4):465-472.
[30]	Chia VA, Esguerra RJ, Teoh KH, et al. In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: The effect of implant angulation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(2):313-321.
[31]	Sallorenzo A, Gómez-Polo M. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 128(5):1009-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.032
[32]	Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Lio F, et al. Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: An in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2022, 119: 104072. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072
[33]	Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 120(3):343-352. doi: S0022-3913(17)30776-X pmid: 29627211
[34]	Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2019, 22(1):11-19.
[35]	Motel C, Kirchner E, Adler W, et al. Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020, 29(4):309-314. doi: 10.1111/jopr.v29.4
[36]	Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, et al. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(1):96-104. doi: S0022-3913(19)30076-9 pmid: 31040026
[37]	Carneiro Pereira AL, Carvalho Porto de Freitas RF, de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos M, et al. Trueness of a device for intraoral scanning to capture the angle and distance between implants in edentulous mandibular Arches[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 128(6):1310-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.039
[38]	Huang RX, Liu YX, Huang BX, et al. Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: An in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(7):625-633. doi: 10.1111/clr.v31.7
[39]	Ramsey CD, Ritter RG. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2012, 24(5):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00481.x pmid: 23025311
[40]	洪涛, 李志文, 张芳, 等. 种植修复数字化口内印模及其精度的影响因素[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2021, 37(2):263-268.
[41]	Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(Suppl 1):e54-e64.
[42]	Sequeira V, Harper MT, Lilly CL, et al. Accuracy of digital impressions at varying implant depths: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2023, 32(1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/jopr.v32.1
[43]	Fang JH, An XY, Jeong SM, et al. Digital intraoral scanning technique for edentulous jaws[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 119(5):733-735. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.008

Research progress of factors influencing the accuracy of digital impressions for implant restoration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References 43

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	JIN Min, CHEN Yumao, HAN Minxuan, LU Shijun. Application progress of digital indirect bonding technology in orthodontic bracket positioning [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(3): 227-231.
[2]	BAO Xudong, YUE Lin. Scanning accuracy of intraoral scanning systems and control of its influencing factors [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(9): 769-773.
[3]	CHEN Yuyan, ZHANG Zhihong, LIU Honghong, HAN Qian, CHEN Jia, DUAN Linna. Influence of cortical bone thickness in mandibular posterior region on the accuracy of implantation [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(8): 713-716.
[4]	YANG Ting, TANG Wanrong. Research progress of digital impression in edentulous jaws [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(3): 284-288.
[5]	FU Xinliang, WANG Hao, GAN Xueqi. Application of ICam4D photogrammetry in implant-supported fixed full-arch prosthesis: A case report and literature review [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(1): 72-78.
[6]	. The evaluation of the clinical effect of all-ceramic inlay made by digital impression [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 432-435.
[7]	. Application of chairside CAD/CAM technology in prosthodontics [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 275-279.
[8]	. An in vitro study of the precision of CAD/CAM guides in the posterior area [J]. , 2019, 39(1): 15-19.
[9]	. An in vivo evaluation of the accuracy of 3Shape TRIOS for the whole maxilla [J]. , 2018, 38(9): 808-813.
[10]	. Factors affecting the precision of 3D printing prosthesis [J]. , 2018, 38(9): 860-864.
[11]	. Accuracy of digital impression in gingival soft tissues of patients with chronic periodontitis [J]. , 2018, 38(5): 422-427.
[12]	. The comparison of precision among three types method of cavity preparation directed by simple template of dental implant centered on repair. [J]. , 2016, 36(9): 832-834.
[13]	. Intraoral digital impression technique [J]. , 2015, 35(9): 705-709.
[14]	. The development and progress of the indirect bonding technology [J]. , 2015, 35(4): 318-320.