Stomatology ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 561-566.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2023.06.015
• Summary • Previous Articles Next Articles
DENG Songwen,SHAO Xiangting,XU Jianhao,WANG Chaoyang,FU Baiping()
Revised:
2022-09-29
Online:
2023-06-28
Published:
2023-07-06
CLC Number:
DENG Songwen, SHAO Xiangting, XU Jianhao, WANG Chaoyang, FU Baiping. Research progress on aesthetic evaluation scale in oral rehabilitation[J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(6): 561-566.
Tab.1
Esthetic evaluation scales of implant-supported single crow"
评价量表 | PES | PES/WES | mod-ICAI | PICI | IREI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
评价指标 | 粉色美学 | 近中龈乳头 远中龈乳头 软组织水平 软组织颜色 软组织质地 软组织轮廓 牙槽骨缺损 | 近中龈乳头 远中龈乳头 龈缘水平 软组织轮廓 根面凸度和颜色质地 | 龈缘水平 龈乳头高度 龈缘轮廓 牙龈颜色与纹理质地 | 龈乳头 牙龈顶点 根面凸度 | 近中龈乳头 远中龈乳头 龈缘顶点水平 龈缘轮廓 软组织颜色与质地 牙槽骨缺损 |
白色美学 | 牙冠颜色 牙冠形态 牙冠轮廓 表面纹理 半透明度/个性化特征 | 牙冠近远中径 牙冠切端位置 牙冠唇面凸度 牙冠颜色/半透明度 牙冠表面纹理质地 | 牙冠形态 牙冠颜色 个性化特征 | 牙冠轮廓 牙冠位置 牙冠唇面凸度 个性化特征 牙冠颜色/半透明度 基台可见性 | ||
主观总体评价 | 冠修复体 软组织 整体评分 | |||||
评价细则 | 参照牙 | 同名对照牙 | 同名对照牙 | 同名对照牙 | 同名对照牙 | 同名对照牙/邻牙 |
评价标准 | 2(差异无统计学意义) 1(小的差异) 0(大的差异) | 2(差异无统计学意义) 1(小的差异) 0(大的差异) | 0(差异无统计学意义) 1(小的差异) 2(大的差异) | VAS | VAS | |
总分 | 0~14 | 0~20 | 0~18 | 0~600 | 粉色美学0~600 白色美学0~600 | |
临床可接受阈值 | ≥8 | ≥12 | ≥360 | 粉色美学≥400 白色美学≥400 |
Tab.2
Evaluation scales of orofacial esthetic"
评价量表 | PEI | SEI | DESI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
评价指标 | 面部评价 | 面部对称性 | 面中线对称性 笑线和谐性 | 上中切牙长轴角度与面中线关系 前牙暴露量 下唇与上颌切牙牙弓的平行度 |
口内评价 | 牙弓对称性 牙齿缺失 牙体形状 牙体颜色 牙体位置 牙弓连续性 固定修复体边缘 可摘义齿金属部分 牙染色 牙龈颜色 牙龈退缩 牙磨损程度 | 牙冠位置 牙体形态 牙体颜色 牙龈颜色 牙龈退缩 牙龈增生 牙龈瘢痕 牙间隙/龈乳头缺失 | 牙龈轮廓位置 龈乳头位置 牙弓连续性 前牙轴向位置 邻接位置 牙体颜色 中切牙比例 | |
评价细则 | 评价标准 | 0(不存在) 1(最佳) 5(最差) | 1(良好/不可见) 0(差/可见) | 1(最佳) 5(最差) |
总分 | 10~65 | 0~10 | 面部总分3~15 口内总分7~35 总分10~50 |
[1] |
Mursid S, Maharani D, Kusdhany L. Measuring patient's orofacial estheticsin in prosthodontics:A scoping review of a current instrument[J]. Open Dent J, 2020, 14(1):161-170.
doi: 10.2174/1874210602014010161 |
[2] |
Larsson P, Bondemark L, Häggman-Henrikson B. The impact of oro-facial appearance on oral health-related quality of life:A systematic review[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2021, 48(3):271-281.
doi: 10.1111/joor.v48.3 |
[3] |
Zaidi AB, Karim AA, Mohiuddin S, et al. Effects of dental aesthetics on psycho-social wellbeing among students of health sciences[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2020, 70(6):1002-1005.
pmid: 32810096 |
[4] |
Bjelopavlovic M, Weyhrauch M, Erbe C, et al. Influencing factors on aesthetics:Highly controlled study based on eye movement and the forensic aspects in computer-based assessment of visual appeal in upper front teeth[J]. Appl Sci, 2021, 11(15):6797.
doi: 10.3390/app11156797 |
[5] |
Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2005, 9(4):215-232.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z |
[6] |
Ryge G. Clinical criteria[J]. Int Dent J, 1980, 30(4):347-358.
pmid: 6935165 |
[7] | 叶红强, 柳玉树, 王冠博, 等. 三维数字化仿真设计与实现技术在前牙美学修复中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(10):729-736. |
[8] |
谢慧心, 战德松. 全解剖式氧化锆全瓷冠用于固定义齿美学修复临床评价[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2017, 10(8):467-471.
doi: 10.19538/j.kq.2017.08.005 |
[9] |
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials[J]. Int Dent J, 2007, 57(5):300-302.
pmid: 17992913 |
[10] |
Kim D, Ahn SY, Kim J, et al. Interrater and intrarater reliability of FDI criteria applied to photographs of posterior tooth-colored restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 118(1):18-25. e4.
doi: S0022-3913(16)30524-8 pmid: 28024817 |
[11] |
Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:The pink esthetic score[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(6):639-644.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x |
[12] |
Chen J, Chiang CY, Zhang YQ. Esthetic evaluation of natural teeth in anterior maxilla using the pink and white esthetic scores[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(5):770-777.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-5 |
[13] |
Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria:A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores[J]. J Periodontol, 2009, 80(1):140-151.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435 pmid: 19228100 |
[14] |
Jones AR, Martin W. Comparing pink and white esthetic scores to layperson perception in the single-tooth implant patient[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(6):1348-1353.
doi: 10.11607/jomi.3785 pmid: 25397797 |
[15] | Afrashtehfar KI, Assery MKA, Bryant SR. Aesthetic parameters and patient-perspective assessment tools for maxillary anterior single implants[J]. Int J Dent, 2021, 2021:6684028. |
[16] | Lanza A, di Francesco F, de Marco G, et al. Clinical application of the PES/WES index on natural teeth:Case report and literature review[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2017, 2017:9659062. |
[17] |
Meijer HJA, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, et al. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues:The Implant Crown Aesthetic Index[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(6):645-649.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x |
[18] |
Tettamanti S, Millen C, Gavric J, et al. Esthetic evaluation of implant crowns and peri-implant soft tissue in the anterior maxilla:Comparison and reproducibility of three different indices[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18(3):517-526.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2016.18.issue-3 |
[19] |
Hof M, Umar N, Budas N, et al. Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices-Comparative analysis of reliability and validity[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(7):697-706.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13261 |
[20] |
Vilhjálmsson VH, Klock KS, Størksen K, et al. Aesthetics of implant-supported single anterior maxillary crowns evaluated by objective indices and participants' perceptions[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(12):1399-1403.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2011.22.issue-12 |
[21] | Vaidya S, Ho YLE, Hao J, et al. Evaluation of the influence exerted by different dental specialty backgrounds and measuring instrument reproducibility on esthetic aspects of maxillary implant-supported single crown[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(3):250-256. |
[22] |
Arunyanak SP, Pollini A, Ntounis A, et al. Clinician assessments and patient perspectives of single-tooth implant restorations in the esthetic zone of the maxilla:A systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 118(1):10-17.
doi: S0022-3913(16)30691-6 pmid: 28385430 |
[23] |
Voutilainen A, Pitkäaho T, Kvist T, et al. How to ask about patient satisfaction?The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2016, 72(4):946-957.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12875 pmid: 26689434 |
[24] |
Li XC, Wu BL, Cheng XH, et al. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns:The implant restoration esthetic index and patient perception[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(1):e51-e58.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12659 |
[25] |
Hamdane K, Nasri W. Esthetic evaluation of single implant-supported prostheses:Comparative analysis of the reliability of the esthetic indices[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2022, 34(4):680-688.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.v34.4 |
[26] |
Özhayat EB, Dannemand K. Validation of the prosthetic esthetic index[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2014, 18(5):1447-1456.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1109-x |
[27] |
Øzhayat EB. Responsiveness of the prosthetic esthetic scale[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(3):907-913.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0 |
[28] | Rotundo R, Nieri M, Bonaccini D, et al. The Smile Esthetic Index(SEI):A method to measure the esthetics of the smile. An intra-rater and inter-rater agreement study[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2015, 8(4):397-403. |
[29] |
Frese C, Leciejewski F, Specht R, et al. The dental esthetic screening index:A new tool for assessment of dento-facial esthetics in restorative dentistry[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019, 31(6):572-582.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.v31.6 |
[30] |
Reissmann DR. Dental patient-reported outcome measures are essential for evidence-based prosthetic dentistry[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2019, 19(1):1-6.
doi: S1532-3382(18)30393-2 pmid: 30926098 |
[31] |
Pollini A, Morton D, Arunyanak SP, et al. Evaluation of esthetic parameters related to a single implant restoration by laypeople and dentists[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 124(1):94-99.
doi: S0022-3913(19)30547-5 pmid: 31753457 |
[32] |
Altay MA, Sindel A, Tezeriᶊfener HA, et al. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns:A comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2019, 5(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3 |
[33] |
Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2022, 88(1):201-237.
doi: 10.1111/prd.v88.1 |
[34] |
Lajnert V, Kovacevic Pavicic D, Pavlic A, et al. Smile Aesthetics Satisfaction Scale:Development and validation of a new brief five-item measure of satisfaction with smile aesthetics in adults and the elderly[J]. Int Dent J, 2018, 68(3):162-170.
doi: 10.1111/idj.12362 pmid: 29417573 |
[35] |
Dourado GB, Volpato GH, de Almeida-Pedrin RR, et al. Likert scale vs visual analog scale for assessing facial pleasantness[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2021, 160(6):844-852.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.05.024 |
[36] |
Giannini SPP, Latorre M, Ferreira LP. Condition of Vocal Production-Teacher questionnaire:Comparison of responses on Likert scale and visual analog scale[J]. CoDAS, 2016, 28(1):53-58.
doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015030 |
[37] |
Sterenborg BAMM, Bronkhorst EM, Wetselaar P, et al. The influence of management of tooth wear on oral health-related quality of life[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(7):2567-2573.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2355-8 |
[38] |
Schierz O, Reissmann DR. Dental patient-reported outcomes:The promise of dental implants[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2021, 21(1):101541.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101541 |
[39] |
John MT. Foundations of oral health-related quality of life[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2020.doi:10.1111/joor.13040.
doi: 10.1111/joor.13040 |
[40] | Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile[J]. Community Dent Health, 1994, 11(1):3-11. |
[41] |
Simancas-Pallares M, John MT, Enstad C, et al. The Spanish language 5-item oral health impact profile[J]. Int Dent J, 2020, 70(2):127-135.
doi: 10.1111/idj.12534 pmid: 31750546 |
[42] | Pattanaik S, Lee CH, John MT, et al. Is assessment of oral health-related quality of life burdensome?An item nonresponse analysis of the oral health impact profile[J]. BMC Oral Heal, 2021, 21:605. |
[43] | 刘佳钰, 陈卓凡. 中文版口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP-49)的研制[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2011, 27(8):469-472. |
[44] |
Wong AHH, Cheung CS, McGrath C. Developing a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile(OHIP)for dental aesthetics:OHIP-aesthetic[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2007, 35(1):64-72.
doi: 10.1111/com.2007.35.issue-1 |
[45] |
Larsson P, John MT, Nilner K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2010, 23(3):257-262.
pmid: 20552093 |
[46] |
Reissmann DR, John MT, Enstad CJ, et al. Measuring patients' orofacial appearance:Validity and reliability of the English-language orofacial esthetic scale[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2019, 150(4):278-286.
doi: S0002-8177(18)30886-9 pmid: 30922458 |
[47] |
Simancas-Pallares M, John MT, Prodduturu S, et al. Development, validity and reliability of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale-Spanish version[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2018, 62(4):456-461.
doi: S1883-1958(18)30085-9 pmid: 29866446 |
[48] |
Zhao Y, He SL. Development of the Chinese version of the oro-facial esthetic scale[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2013, 40(9):670-677.
doi: 10.1111/joor.12077 pmid: 23829233 |
[49] |
Alhajj MN, Amran AG, Halboub E, et al. Development, validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale:OES-Ar[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2017, 61(3):290-296.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.10.004 |
[50] |
Bela Andela S, Lamprecht R, John MT, et al. Development of a one-item version of the orofacial esthetic scale[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(1):713-718.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04049-6 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||