牙槽嵴保存术在牙周感染位点中的应用:从软硬组织再生到后续种植修复

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

Periodontitis can lead to the destruction of hard and soft tissue, and the periodontally compromised extraction sockets often suffer from hard and soft tissue defects, which will affect the followed implant restoration. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) can be performed at the same time with tooth extraction to promote the reconstruction of alveolar socket and reduce the resorption of alveolar ridge, in order to preserve hard and soft tissue. Taking the postoperative soft tissue change and followed implant placement into account, this review aims to focus on the effect of periodontal infection on the healing of the alveolar socket, the effectiveness of ARP at periodontally compromised extraction sockets, and its influencing factors.

Key words: alveolar ridge preservation, periodontally compromised site, soft and hard tissue, influencing factor

CLC Number:

R781.4

SUN Xulin, DAI Anna, HUANG Jiaping, XU Shengying, DING Peihui. Application of alveolar ridge preservation technique in periodontally compromised extraction sockets: From soft and hard tissue regeneration to followed implant restoration[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(2): 130-138.

Figures/Tables 1

Tab.1

Summary of the main results of literature on alveolar ridge preservation in periodontally compromised extraction sockets"

作者(年份)	研究设计	分组类型及手术方法	人数	拔除牙位	随访时间	硬组织相关指标	软组织相关指标	种植相关指标
Romano等 (2019)^[28]	病例系列报告	仅ARP组:Bio-Oss +双层Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合	9	前牙、前磨牙	12个月	颊侧骨壁高度增加(2.91±1.08)mm;距牙槽嵴顶1 mm处骨壁水平宽度减少(2.57±1.32)mm	未评估	种植同期骨增量手术概率为0%
Noh等 (2021)^[29]	病例系列报告	ARP组:Bio-Oss +双层Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合;早期植入(自然愈合)组:无	9/7	无要求	3、6、 12个月	未评估	软组织体积(12个月):ARP组增加(0.88 ± 4.31)mm³,早期植入组增加(0.95 ± 3.14)mm³	种植同期骨增量手术概率:ARP组为77.8%,早期植入组为100.0%;种植体存活率:两组均为100.0%
Kim等 (2017)^[26]	回顾性研究	仅ARP组:骨移植物不确定+Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合	297	无要求	无	未评估	未评估	未评估
Lee等 (2021)^[30]	回顾性研究	ARP组:牙槽窝移植物未知+Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合;自然愈合组:无	247/ 171	无要求	无	未评估	未评估	种植同期骨增量手术概率:ARP组23.5%,自然愈合组45.0%;种植失败率:ARP组1.6%,自然愈合组0.6%
Wei等 (2021)^[31]	回顾性研究	ARP组:Bio-Oss +Bio-Gide+未拉拢+医用海绵;自然愈合组:无	20/11	上颌磨牙	无	未评估	未评估	种植同期骨增量手术概率:ARP组25.0%,自然愈合组63.7%;种植体存活率:两组均为100.0%
Zhao等 (2018)^[25]	前瞻性临床试验	ARP组:Bio-Oss +Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合;自然愈合组:无	18/18	磨牙	6个月	颊侧骨壁中央高度:ARP组增加(1.00±2.30)mm,自然愈合组减少(0.85±2.52)mm;距牙槽嵴顶1 mm处骨壁水平宽度:ARP组增加0.21~5.30 mm,自然愈合组减少0.12~1.00 mm	角化龈宽度:ARP组减少(1.10±1.70) mm,自然愈合组减少(0.70±1.40)mm	未评估
Wei等 (2022)^[33]	前瞻性临床试验	ARP组:Bio-Oss +Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合+医用海绵;自然愈合组:无	18/18	上颌磨牙	6个月	颊侧骨壁高度:ARP组增加(0.20±1.75)mm,自然愈合组减少(1.55±0.97)mm;拔牙窝体积:ARP组增加35.5%,自然愈合组增加8.0%	未评估	种植同期骨增量手术概率:ARP组16.7%,自然愈合组50.0%
Zhao等 (2022)^[32]	前瞻性临床试验	ARP组:Bio-Oss+Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合;自然愈合组:无	16/14	磨牙	3年	未评估	未评估	种植同期骨增量手术概率:ARP组6.3%,自然愈合组35.7%;种植体存活率:两组均为100.0%
Lee等 (2018)^[34]	随机对照试验	DBBM组:Bio-Oss+Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合;DPBM组:DPBM +Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合	50/50	无要求	4个月	骨壁垂直高度:DBBM组减少(1.45±1.92)mm,DPBM组减少(1.22±2.16)mm;骨壁水平宽度:DBBM组减少(1.83±2.85)mm,DPBM组减少(1.43±3.40)mm;拔牙窝体积:DBBM组减少(8.1±22.2)%,DPBM组减少(6.5±24.2)%	近中龈乳头高度:DBBM组减少(0.82±1.22)mm,DPBM组减少(0.87±1.21)mm;远中龈乳头高度:DBBM组减少(0.15±1.60)mm,DPBM组减少(0.23±1.65)mm	未评估
Aimetti等 (2018)^[23]	随机对照试验	ARP组:Bio-Oss +双层Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合;自然愈合组:无	15/15	前牙、前磨牙	12个月	骨壁水平宽度:ARP组减少(1.97±1.55)mm,自然愈合组减少(3.83±1.49)mm;拔牙窝体积:ARP组减少9.1%,自然愈合组减少35.2%	未评估	未评估
Koo等 (2020)^[35]	随机对照试验	DBBM组:Bio-Oss+Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合;DPBM组:DPBM +Bio-Gide+拉拢缝合	42/39	无要求	4个月	未评估	未评估	未评估
Lim等 (2020)^[36]	随机对照试验	ARP组:Bio-Oss +双层Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合;早期植入(自然愈合)组:无	9/7	前牙、前磨牙	12个月	未评估	近中龈乳头高度:ARP组增加(0.52 ± 0.50)mm,早期植入组增加(0.03±0.99)mm;远中龈乳头高度:ARP组增加(0.54±0.57)mm,早期植入组增加(0.05±0.72)mm	未评估
Ben Amara等 (2021)^[22]	随机对照试验	ARP组:Bio-Oss +双层Bio-Gide+未拉拢缝合;自然愈合组:无	13/13	无要求	6个月	骨壁垂直高度:ARP组增加(0.25±1.45)mm,自然愈合组减少(0.39±0.90)mm;距牙槽嵴顶1 mm处骨壁水平宽度:ARP组减少(6.13±4.82)mm,自然愈合组减少(9.40±4.00)mm;拔牙窝体积:ARP组减少26.5%,自然愈合组减少50.3%	未评估	未评估

Tab.1

References 66

[1]	赖思煜, 侯建霞. 牙槽嵴保存在非牙周炎与牙周炎患牙拔牙位点的应用进展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(4):266-270.
[2]	Tonetti MS, Jung RE, Avila-Ortiz G, et al. Management of the extraction socket and timing of implant placement: Consensus report and clinical recommendations of group 3 of the XV European Workshop in Periodontology[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(Suppl 21):183-194. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2019.46.issue-S21
[3]	López-Martínez F, Gómez Moreno G, Olivares-Ponce P, et al. Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(9):992-995. doi: 10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-9
[4]	王茂夏, 陈娅倩, 胡琛, 等. 重度牙周炎患者的全口种植时机考量[J]. 口腔医学, 2019, 39(10):941-943.
[5]	Kehl M, Swierkot K, Mengel R. Three-dimensional measurement of bone loss at implants in patients with periodontal disease[J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(5):689-699. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100318 pmid: 21080785
[6]	Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, et al. Alveolar socket healing: What can we learn?[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2015, 68(1):122-134. doi: 10.1111/prd.12082 pmid: 25867983
[7]	Trombelli L, Farina R, Marzola A, et al. Modeling and remodel-ing of human extraction sockets[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(7):630-639. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.x pmid: 18498382
[8]	Sculean A, Stavropoulos A, Bosshardt DD. Self-regenerative capacity of intra-oral bone defects[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(Suppl 21):70-81. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2019.46.issue-S21
[9]	Kerr EN, Mealey BL, Noujeim ME, et al. The effect of ultrasound on bone dimensional changes following extraction: A pilot study[J]. J Periodontol, 2008, 79(2):283-290. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070289 pmid: 18251642
[10]	Tan WL, Wong TLT, Wong MCM, et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5):1-21.
[11]	Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4):313-323.
[12]	Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction[J]. Aust Dent J, 1969, 14(4):241-244. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb06001.x pmid: 5259350
[13]	Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014, 41(Suppl 15):S6-S22.
[14]	Farmer M, Darby I. Ridge dimensional changes following single-tooth extraction in the aesthetic zone[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 25(2):272-277.
[15]	Chappuis V, Engel O, Shahim K, et al. Soft tissue alterations in esthetic postextraction sites[J]. J Dent Res, 2015, 94(Suppl9):187S-193S. doi: 10.1177/0022034515592869
[16]	Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans[J]. J Periodontol, 2003, 74(7):990-999. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990 pmid: 12931761
[17]	Barone A, Ricci M, Tonelli P, et al. Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: A comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(11):1231-1237. doi: 10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-11
[18]	Kim JH, Koo KT, Capetillo J, et al. Periodontal and endodontic pathology delays extraction socket healing in a canine model[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2017, 47(3):143-153. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.143
[19]	Ahn JJ, Shin HI. Bone tissue formation in extraction sockets from sites with advanced periodontal disease: A histomorphometric study in humans[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008, 23(6):1133-1138.
[20]	Bertl K, Kukla EB, Albugami R, et al. Timeframe of socket cortication after tooth extraction: A retrospective radiographic study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(1):130-138.
[21]	张超颖, 龚佳幸, 俞梦飞, 等. 牙槽嵴保存术在牙周炎拔牙患者中的应用进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2023, 43(2):159-165.
[22]	Ben Amara H, Kim JJ, Kim HY, et al. Is ridge preservation effective in the extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth? A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021, 48(3):464-477. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13412 pmid: 33316099
[23]	Aimetti M, Manavella V, Corano L, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of bone remodeling following ridge augmentation of compromised extraction sockets in periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(2):202-214.
[24]	Zhao LP, Wei YP, Xu T, et al. Changes in alveolar process dimensions following extraction of molars with advanced periodontal disease: A clinical pilot study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(4):324-335.
[25]	Zhao LP, Xu T, Hu WJ, et al. Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: A prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3):333-344. doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-3
[26]	Kim JJ, Ben Amara H, Schwarz F, et al. Is ridge preservation/augmentation at periodontally compromised extraction sockets safe? A retrospective study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2017, 44(10):1051-1058. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2017.44.issue-10
[27]	Iorio-Siciliano V, Ramaglia L, Blasi A, et al. Dimensional changes following alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior area using bovine-derived xenografts and collagen membrane compared to spontaneous healing: A 6-month randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(2):1013-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02979-w
[28]	Romano F, Manavella V, Bottone M, et al. Immediate augmentation of compromised extraction sockets in chronic periodontitis patients: 1-year results of a case series on volumetric and histologic response[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2019, 39(2):245-251. doi: 10.11607/prd.3337 pmid: 30794260
[29]	Noh K, Thoma DS, Park JC, et al. A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):1714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81402-5 pmid: 33462323
[30]	Lee J, Yun J, Kim JJ, et al. Retrospective study of alveolar ridge preservation compared with no alveolar ridge preservation in periodontally compromised extraction sockets[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2021, 7(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00305-2 pmid: 33768356
[31]	Wei YP, Zhang B, Yang G, et al. Effect of ridge preservation at molar extraction sites with severe periodontitis on the Schneiderian membrane thickness changes: A pilot study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01546-8 pmid: 33845803
[32]	Zhao LP, Hu WJ, Liu YS, et al. Evaluation of implant placement following ridge preservation in periodontally compromised molar extraction sockets: Three-year results of a prospective cohort study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2022, 33(7):735-744. doi: 10.1111/clr.v33.7
[33]	Wei YP, Xu T, Zhao LP, et al. Ridge preservation in maxillary molar extraction sites with severe periodontitis: A prospective observational clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(3):2391-2399. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04204-z
[34]	Lee JS, Cha JK, Kim CS. Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(5):729-737. doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-5
[35]	Koo TH, Song YW, Cha JK, et al. Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(1):93-102.
[36]	Lim HC, Seo S, Thoma DS, et al. Late implant placement following ridge preservation versus early implant placement: A pilot randomized clinical trial for periodontally compromised non-molar extraction sites[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(2):247-256. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.v47.2
[37]	Blanco J, Carral C, Argibay O, et al. Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2019, 79(1):151-167. doi: 10.1111/prd.2019.79.issue-1
[38]	Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 4(4):CD010176.
[39]	Ramanauskaite A, Sader R. Esthetic complications in implant dentistry[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2022, 88(1):73-85. doi: 10.1111/prd.v88.1
[40]	Song YW, Yoon SW, Cha JK, et al. Soft tissue dimensions following tooth extraction in the posterior maxilla: A randomized clinical trial comparing alveolar ridge preservation to spontaneous healing[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(8):2583. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082583
[41]	Evans CDJ, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/clr.2008.19.issue-1
[42]	Khzam N, Arora H, Kim P, et al. Systematic review of soft tissue alterations and esthetic outcomes following immediate implant placement and restoration of single implants in the anterior maxilla[J]. J Periodontol, 2015, 86(12):1321-1330. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150287 pmid: 26313019
[43]	Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(Suppl 15):32-49.
[44]	Jung RE, Ioannidis A, Hämmerle CHF, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1):165-175. doi: 10.1111/prd.2018.77.issue-1
[45]	Hu KF, Lin YC, Huang YT, et al. A retrospective cohort study of how alveolar ridge preservation affects the need of alveolar ridge augmentation at posterior tooth implant sites[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(7): 4643-4649. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03778-y
[46]	Atieh MA, Alnaqbi M, Abdunabi F, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation in extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2022, 33(9): 869-885. doi: 10.1111/clr.v33.9
[47]	Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(Suppl 21):195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2019.46.issue-S21
[48]	Spinato S, Galindo-Moreno P, Zaffe D, et al. Is socket healing conditioned by buccal plate thickness? A clinical and histologic study 4 months after mineralized human bone allografting[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 25(2):e120-e126.
[49]	Canullo L, Del Fabbro M, Khijmatgar S, et al. Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(1):141-158. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04248-1
[50]	Canellas JVDS, Soares BN, Ritto FG, et al. What grafting materials produce greater alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction? A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2021, 49(11):1064-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.06.005
[51]	Inomata K, Marukawa E, Takahashi Y, et al. The effect of covering materials with an open wound in alveolar ridge augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: An experimental study in the dog[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 27(6):1413-1421. pmid: 23189291
[52]	Schlegel AK, Möhler H, Busch F, et al. Preclinical and clinical studies of a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide)[J]. Biomaterials, 1997, 18(7):535-538. pmid: 9105592
[53]	Nunes FAS, Pignaton TB, Novaes AB Jr, et al. Evaluation of a bone substitute covered with a collagen membrane for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clinical and tomographic randomized controlled study in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(4):424-433.
[54]	Schneider D, Schmidlin PR, Philipp A, et al. Labial soft tissue volume evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: A randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014, 41(6):612-617. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12246 pmid: 24593810
[55]	Canullo L, Pesce P, Antonacci D, et al. Soft tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation using different sealing materials: A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(1):13-39. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04192-0
[56]	Hong HR, Chen CY, Kim DM, et al. Ridge preservation procedures revisited: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate dimensional changes with two different surgical protocols[J]. J Periodontol, 2019, 90(4):331-338. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0041 pmid: 30367733
[57]	胡文杰. 牙槽嵴保存术的临床实施问题探讨[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3):249-258.
[58]	Houmani M, Nader N, Salameh Z, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic maxillary zone: Tuberosity punch technique of gingiva and bone: A pilot study[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2021, 22(3):290-297. pmid: 34210931
[59]	Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, et al. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: A comparative clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(3):377-387. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090342 pmid: 21043792
[60]	Aladmawy MA, Natto ZS, Steffensen B, et al. A comparison between primary and secondary flap coverage in ridge preservation procedures: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 7679319.
[61]	Barone A, Ricci M, Romanos GE, et al. Buccal bone deficiency in fresh extraction sockets: A prospective single cohort study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(7):823-830. doi: 10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-7
[62]	Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, et al. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5):22-38.
[63]	赵丽萍, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 等. 罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3):579-585.
[64]	Kim JJ, Ben Amara H, Chung I, et al. Compromised extraction sockets: A new classification and prevalence involving both soft and hard tissue loss[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2021, 51(2):100-113. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2005120256
[65]	曹直, 王亚玲, 刘志云. 牙槽嵴保存术对不同牙槽骨缺损患者延迟种植效果的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(8):830-833, 836.
[66]	Juodzbalys G, Stumbras A, Goyushov S, et al. Morphological classification of extraction sockets and clinical decision tree for socket preservation/augmentation after tooth extraction: A systematic review[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2019, 10(3):e3.

Application of alveolar ridge preservation technique in periodontally compromised extraction sockets: From soft and hard tissue regeneration to followed implant restoration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 1

References 66

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	FAN Dian, LIU Hao, YUAN Changyong, WANG Penglai. Factors influencing mechanical properties of clear aligners and research progress [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(3): 278-281.
[2]	ZHANG Chaoying, GONG Jiaxing, YU Mengfei, QIAN Ying, ZHU Ziyu, LU Kejie, WANG Huiming. Application progress of alveolar ridge preservation in patients with tooth extracted due to periodontitis [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(2): 159-165.
[3]	WEI Xiaoyu, ZHANG Guanning, ZHAO Qing. Progress of the study on factors influencing orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(11): 1034-1040.
[4]	HE Mengjia, ZHOU Yu, WANG Sijie, SI Jiaping, CHEN Xiaoyan. Research progress of efficiency and influencing factors of maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(9): 851-855.
[5]	QIU Ling, FAN Liwen, PAN Yongchu. Study on influencing factors of restart in clear aligner treatment [J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(4): 319-322.
[6]	. Contrastive study on alveolar ridge preservation: Tooth extraction through dentoalveolar distraction [J]. , 2019, 39(3): 207-209.
[7]	. Effect of photocured chitosangelatin 3D scaffold on the height and width of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction [J]. , 2018, 38(2): 114-119.
[8]	. Study on the factors affecting the risk of early childhood caries in Nanjing [J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1128-1131.
[9]	. A retrospective research of the rapeutic effect of immediate implant and delayed implant following alveolar ridge preservation after minimally invasive extraction in anterior area [J]. , 2017, 37(4): 325-330.
[10]	. Analysis of prognosis and influencing factors of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland [J]. , 2017, 37(1): 65-68.
[11]	. Research of the cellular uptake mechanism of nanoparticles and its influencing factors [J]. , 2016, 36(6): 573-576.
[12]	. Study on changes of soft tissue and hard tissue treated by individualized lingual appliance in adults with Angle Class Ⅱ malocclusion [J]. , 2014, 34(7): 528-530.