Stomatology ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 192-199.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.03.006
• Basic and Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Xinxin1,MIAO Zhenyun2,JING Xue1,MA Siyu1,LI Tao1()
Received:
2023-10-16
Online:
2024-03-28
Published:
2024-03-20
CLC Number:
GUO Xinxin, MIAO Zhenyun, JING Xue, MA Siyu, LI Tao. Comparative study on the bonding properties of five kinds of fluid resins to enamel[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(3): 192-199.
[1] |
Mathur VP, Dhillon JK. Dental caries: A disease which needs attention[J]. Indian J Pediatr, 2018, 85(3):202-206.
doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2381-6 pmid: 28643162 |
[2] |
Pitts NB, Twetman S, Fisher J, et al. Understanding dental caries as a non-communicable disease[J]. Br Dent J, 2021, 231(12):749-753.
doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3775-4 |
[3] |
Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, et al. Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites[J]. Dent Mater J, 2017, 36(2):205-213.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-131 pmid: 28154317 |
[4] |
Al-Hasan RM, Al-Taee LA. Interfacial bond strength and morphology of sound andcaries-affected dentin surfaces bonded to two resin-modified glass ionomer cements[J]. Oper Dent, 2022, 47(4):E188-E196.
doi: 10.2341/21-048-L pmid: 35917246 |
[5] |
Nitta K, Nomoto R, Tsubota Y, et al. Characteristics of low polymerization shrinkage flowable resin composites in newly-developed cavity base materials for bulk filling technique[J]. Dent Mater J, 2017, 36(6):740-746.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-394 pmid: 28652556 |
[6] |
Qin M, Liu HS. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2005, 30(5):580-587.
pmid: 16268391 |
[7] |
Nie J, Yap AU, Wang XY. Influence of shrinkage and viscosity of flowable composite liners on cervical microleakage of class Ⅱ restorations: A micro-CT analysis[J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(6):656-664.
doi: 10.2341/17-091-L pmid: 30142038 |
[8] |
Ozer F, Irmak O, Yakymiv O, et al. Three-year clinical performance of two giomer restorative materials in restorations[J]. Oper Dent, 2021, 46(1):E60-E67.
doi: 10.2341/17-353-C pmid: 33882138 |
[9] |
Ozer F, Patel R, Yip J, et al. Five-year clinical performance of two fluoride-releasing giomer resin materials in occlusal restorations[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2022, 34(8):1213-1220.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12948 pmid: 35934807 |
[10] |
Rusnac ME, Prodan D, Cuc S, et al. Water sorption and solubility of flowable giomers[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(9):2399.
doi: 10.3390/ma14092399 |
[11] |
Warangkulkasemkit S, Pumpaluk P. Comparison of physical properties of three commercial composite core build-up materials[J]. Dent Mater J, 2019, 38(2):177-181.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-038 pmid: 30381634 |
[12] |
Gindri LD, Cassol IP, Fröhlich TT, et al. One-year clinical evaluation of class Ⅱ bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Braz Dent J, 2022, 33(6):110-120.
doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202205069 |
[13] |
Łagocka R, Jakubowska K, Chlubek D, et al. Elution study of unreacted TEGDMA from bulk-fill composite(SDRTM Dentsply)using HPLC[J]. Adv Med Sci, 2015, 60(2):191-198.
doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2015.02.003 |
[14] |
Francis AV, Braxton AD, Ahmad W, et al. Cuspal flexure and extent of cure of a bulk-fill flowable base composite[J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 40(5):515-523.
doi: 10.2341/14-235-L pmid: 25741908 |
[15] | Aboobaker S, Nair BG, Gopal R, et al. Effect of intra-orifice barriers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: An ex-vivo study[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(2):ZC17-ZC20. |
[16] |
Rangappa A, Srinivasulu J, Rangaswamy V, et al. Comparative evaluation of bond strength of self-adhering flowable composites to the dentin prepared with different burs: An in vitro study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(6):618-621.
doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_71_18 |
[17] |
Moecke SE, Silva AGCS, Andrade ACM, et al. Efficacy of S-PRG filler varnishes on enamel caries remineralization[J]. J Dent, 2022, 119: 104074.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104074 |
[18] |
Hatirli H, Yasa B, Yasa E. Microleakage and penetration depth of different fissure sealant materials after cyclic thermo-mechanic and brushing simulation[J]. Dent Mater J, 2018, 37(1):15-23.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-234 pmid: 28845033 |
[19] |
Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, et al. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2019, 30(3):403-407.
doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17 |
[20] | Zakavi F, Mombeini M, Dibazar S, et al. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia to composite resin using different adhesive systems[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2019, 11(3):e257-e263. |
[21] | Chai Y, Lin H, Zheng G, et al. Evaluation of the micro-shear bond strength of four adhesive systems to dentin with and without adhesive area limitation[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2015, 26(Suppl 1):S63-S72. |
[22] | Braga RR, Meira JBC, Boaro LCC, et al. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of macro test methods[J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(2):e38-e49. |
[23] | Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Directcomparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: A critical literature review[J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(2):e78-e93. |
[24] |
Tahmasbi S, Badiee M, Modarresi M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to composite restorations using universal adhesive[J]. J Dent, 2019, 20(2):75-82.
pmid: 31214633 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||