导板与超声拆除磨牙纤维桩对比研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.12.009

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of two fiber post removal methods, guide-supported and ultrasound assisted, for the removal of fiber posts in molars using in vitro experiments. Methods Twelve human extracted molars were randomly divided into a guide group and an ultrasound group for root canal treatment and fiber post restoration. The fiber posts were removed using digital guide and ultrasound instruments, respectively. The time of removal of fiber post and the degree of tooth tissue damage was compared between two groups. Results The operation time for each tooth in the ultrasound group was (11.14±1.62) minutes, while that in the guide group was (5.40±0.90) minutes. The ultrasound group had a significantly longer duration than the guide group, and the degree of crown damage to dental tissue was also significantly higher than that of the guide group. Conclusion Removing fiber posts with the support of guide can shorten clinical operation time, reduce technical sensitivity, and preserve remaining dental tissue as much as possible.

Key words: digital, guide, ultrasonic, fiber post, removal

CLC Number:

R783.3

GE Bing, HUANG Lumei, ZHU Wenwei, ZHU Ye, WU Yumin, CHEN Chen. A comparative study on guide access and ultrasonic access for fiber post removal[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(12): 927-930.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Tab.1

Fig.5

References 22

[1]	Lindemann M, Yaman P, Dennison JB, et al. Comparison of the efficiency and effectiveness of various techniques for removal of fiber posts[J]. J Endod, 2005, 31(7):520-522.
[2]	Qing H, Zhu ZM, Chao YL, et al. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007, 97(2):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.008 pmid: 17341377
[3]	Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(4):431-437. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123227 pmid: 12011860
[4]	李萍, 朱智敏. 循环加载对不同桩核修复后牙体抗折强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(2):206-208.
[5]	Parisi C, Valandro LF, Ciocca L, et al. Clinical outcomes and success rates of quartz fiber post restorations: A retrospective study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(3):367-372. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.011 pmid: 26013066
[6]	Stamos DE, Gutmann JL. Survey of endodontic retreatment methods used to remove intraradicular posts[J]. J Endod, 1993, 19(7):366-369.
[7]	Giok KC, Veettil SK, Menon RK. Comparative effectiveness of fiber and metal posts in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review with network meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2023: S0022 -S3913(23)00569-3.
[8]	Scotti N, Bergantin E, Alovisi M, et al. Evaluation of a simplified fiber post removal system[J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(11):1431-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.005 pmid: 24139268
[9]	Zhang WL, Wu WQ, Liao SH, et al. Fabrication of guide and removal of fiber post by tetrahedron positioning technology at the chair side: A case report and literature review[J]. J Prevt Treat Stomatol Dis, 2021, 29(7):479-484.
[10]	Schwindling FS, Tasaka A, Hilgenfeld T, et al. Three-dimensional-guided removal and preparation of dental root posts-concept and feasibility[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2020, 64(1):104-108. doi: S1883-1958(18)30403-1 pmid: 31104945
[11]	Maia LM, Moreira Júnior G, Albuquerque RC, et al. Three-dimensional endodontic guide for adhesive fiber post removal: A dental technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(3):387-390. doi: S0022-3913(18)30634-6 pmid: 30477921
[12]	Perez C, Finelle G, Couvrechel C. Optimisation of a guided endodontics protocol for removal of fibre-reinforced posts[J]. Aust Endod J, 2020, 46(1):107-114. doi: 10.1111/aej.12379 pmid: 31603599
[13]	张威龙, 吴婉淇, 廖珊华, 等. 椅旁四面体定位技术制作导板拆除纤维桩1例及文献复习[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(7):479-484. doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.07.008
[14]	Angnanon W, Thammajaruk P, Guazzato M. Effective luting agents for glass-fiber posts: A network meta-analysis[J]. Dent Mater, 2023, 39(12):1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.015 pmid: 37845166
[15]	Anderson GC, Perdigão J, Hodges JS, et al. Efficiency and effectiveness of fiber post removal using 3 techniques[J]. Quintessence Int, 2007, 38(8):663-670. pmid: 17823684
[16]	Kim JJ, Alapati S, Knoernschild KL, et al. Micro-computed tomography of tooth volume changes following post removal[J]. J Prosthodont, 2017, 26(6):522-528. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12442 pmid: 26849024
[17]	Aydemir S, Arukaslan G, Sarıdağ S, et al. Comparing fracture resistance and the time required for two different fiber post removal systems[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(8):771-774. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12575 pmid: 28067979
[18]	Touré B, Faye B, Kane AW, et al. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: A prospective study[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(11):1512-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.002 pmid: 22000453
[19]	Alfredo E, Garrido AD, Souza-Filho CB, et al. In vitro evaluation of the effect of core diameter for removing radicular post with ultrasound[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2004, 31(6):590-594. pmid: 15189318
[20]	Bergeron BE, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, et al. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal[J]. J Endod, 2001, 27(1):13-17.
[21]	Garrido ADB, Oliveira AG, Osório JEV, et al. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement[J]. Int Endod J, 2009, 42(7):609-613. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01555.x pmid: 19467051
[22]	Hauman CH, Chandler NP, Purton DG. Factors influencing the removal of posts[J]. Int Endod J, 2003, 36(10):687-690. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00715.x pmid: 14511226

试样	1	2	3	4	5	6	$\bar{x}±s$
超声组	12.86	10.5	11.25	13.16	9.05	10.03	11.14±1.62
导板组	4.91	6.7	5.25	4.32	6.42	4.82	5.40±0.90

A comparative study on guide access and ultrasonic access for fiber post removal

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 22

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIU Anqi, XIA Lunguo. Digital early intervention and multi-disciplinary treatment with malocclusion [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(8): 576-580.
[2]	WANG Youjin, WEI Bin. Current status of the application of digital impression technology in removable partial dentures [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(6): 462-468.
[3]	HU Shuai, FANG Qing, LU Qiyuan, TAO Jianxiang. Comparison of accuracy of maxillary dentition defect models acquired through digital impression and traditional pressure impression [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(6): 433-437.
[4]	DING Chengfang, Kadiliya·TUERXUNJIANG , Ailimaierdan·AINIWAER , Muladili·MAIHEMUTI , Dilihumaer·KUERBAN , WANG Ling. Preliminary study on the application of digital guide plate in immediate autogenous tooth transplantation [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(5): 381-385.
[5]	WANG Liaoliao, YANG Yaoyao, WU Jiang. Application of digital impression technique in removable partial denture restoration and factors affecting its accuracy [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(4): 312-315.
[6]	WANG Yinlin, ZHANG Xinyue, LI Mingxing, FU Baiping. Influence factors on colorimetry of aesthetic porcelain laminate veneer prosthesis for anterior teeth [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(3): 203-208.
[7]	WANG Han, HU Jian. Research progress of factors influencing the accuracy of digital impressions for implant restoration [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(3): 221-226.
[8]	PU Yiming, ZHOU Jing, LIU Qinghui, LYU Hong, BU Honghu, LI Qian, TANG Rongsui. One case of simultaneous implantation after extraction of maxillary impacted teeth under the guidance of digital guide [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(2): 121-125.
[9]	GAO Hui, YU Dongsheng. Interpretation of the International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the prevention of traumatic dental injuries(2024) [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(12): 881-886.
[10]	ZHENG Yue, ZHANG Senlin. Progress of research on clincal application of computer-assisted implant placement techniques for zygomatic implant placement [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(12): 957-960.
[11]	SHI Yulin, LI Gang, HOU Xiaochong, BAI Shizhu, ZHAO Yimin. Research on the development of digital Stomatology education in China [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(1): 1-5.
[12]	ZHENG Yuxin, DING Yude, CHEN Feng, YANG Fan. Research progress of silk fibroin as barrier membrane material in oral tissue regeneration [J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(1): 69-74.
[13]	XIE Yuqing, ZHANG Yang, WANG Lei. Clinical efficacy evaluation of simultaneous root canal preparation combined with ultrasonic washing in root canal treatment of diabetic patients [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(8): 711-716.
[14]	ZHANG Zhenyu, ZHAO Bin, MA Yanning. Application of guide and navigation technology based on digital imaging in stomatology [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(7): 667-672.
[15]	YU Haiyang, ZHANG Na, HE Zijing, FANG Tinglu, HAN Li. The relationship between dentists and dental technicians in the digital age of weak artificial intelligence [J]. Stomatology, 2023, 43(7): 577-583.