Stomatology ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 685-691.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.09.008
• Basic and Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-12-21
Online:
2024-09-28
Published:
2024-09-10
CLC Number:
WANG Bo, CHANG Xin. Evaluation of three-dimensional osseous structure of temporomandibular joint according to sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(9): 685-691.
[1] |
Ayyıldız E, Orhan M, Bahşi I, et al. Morphometric evaluation of the temporomandibular joint on cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2021, 43(6): 975-996.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02617-1 pmid: 33221971 |
[2] | Nithin, Ahmed J, Sujir N, et al. Morphological assessment of TMJ spaces, mandibular condyle, and glenoid Fossa using cone beam computed tomography(CBCT): A retrospective analysis[J]. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2021, 31(1): 78-85. |
[3] |
Noh KJ, Baik HS, Han SS, et al. Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2021, 51(2): 126-134.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126 pmid: 33678628 |
[4] |
Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(6):1063-1069.
doi: 10.2319/120908-620R.1 pmid: 19852595 |
[5] | Buschang PH, Santos-Pinto A. Condylar growth and glenoid fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 113(4): 437-442. |
[6] | Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: Comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 132(4): 429-438. |
[7] |
Gorucu-Coskuner H, Atik E, El H. Reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for temporomandibular joint analysis[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2019, 49(2): 81-88.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.2.81 pmid: 30941294 |
[8] | Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders(DC/TMD)for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and orofacial pain special interest group[J]. J Oral Facial Pain Headache, 2014, 28(1): 6-27. |
[9] | Yun JM, Choi YJ, Woo SH, et al. Temporomandibular joint morphology in Korean using cone-beam computed tomography: Influence of age and gender[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2021, 43(1): 21. |
[10] |
Tanne K, Tanaka E, Sakuda M. Stress distributions in the TMJ during clenching in patients with vertical discrepancies of the craniofacial complex[J]. J Orofac Pain, 1995, 9(2):153-160.
pmid: 7488985 |
[11] | Santander P, Quast A, Olbrisch C, et al. Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns-a cross-sectional study[J]. Head Face Med, 2020, 16(1): 33. |
[12] | Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part Ⅰ[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993, 103(4): 299-312. |
[13] |
Ma QL, Bimal P, Mei L, et al. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2018, 149(7): 589-598.
doi: S0002-8177(18)30121-1 pmid: 29655707 |
[14] |
Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S, et al. Comparison of the stress direction on the TMJ in patients with Class Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ skeletal relationships[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2008, 11(1):43-50.
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00413.x pmid: 18199079 |
[15] | Westesson PL, Bifano JA, Tallents RH, et al. Increased horizontal angle of the mandibular condyle in abnormal temporomandibular joints. A magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1991, 72(3): 359-363. |
[16] |
Katsavrias EG. Changes in articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period[J]. Angle Orthod, 2002, 72(3): 258-264.
pmid: 12071610 |
[17] |
Tariq QUA, Jan A. Condylar size and position, comparison among different sagittal skeletal relationships: A CBCT study[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2023, 33(5): 509-515.
doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.05.509 pmid: 37190683 |
[18] | Fan XC, Ma LS, Chen L, et al. Temporomandibular joint osseous morphology of class Ⅰ and class Ⅱ malocclusions in the normal skeletal pattern: A cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. Diagnostics, 2021, 11(3): 541. |
[19] |
Lobo F, Tolentino ES, Iwaki LCV, et al. Imaginology tridimensional study of temporomandibular joint osseous components according to sagittal skeletal relationship, sex, and age[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2019, 30(5): 1462-1465.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005467 pmid: 31299744 |
[20] |
Christiansen EL, Chan TT, Thompson JR, et al. Computed tomography of the normal temporomandibular joint[J]. Scand J Dent Res, 1987, 95(6): 499-509.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1987.tb01966.x pmid: 3480568 |
[21] |
Yasa Y, Akgül HM. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the osseous morphology of the temporomandibular joint in temporomandibular dysfunction patients and asymptomatic individuals[J]. Oral Radiol, 2018, 34(1): 31-39.
doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0279-7 pmid: 30484086 |
[22] | Meral SE, Karaaslan S, Tüz HH, et al. Evaluation of the temporomandibular joint morphology and condylar position with cone-beam computerized tomography in patients with internal derangement[J]. Oral Radiol, 2023, 39(1): 173-179. |
[23] | 郭向红, 丁寅, 房伟, 等. 不同矢状骨面型颞下颌关节窝位置的测量研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2007, 23(5): 275-277. |
[24] |
Gong AX, Li J, Wang ZD, et al. Cranial base characteristics in anteroposterior malocclusions: A meta-analysis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016, 86(4): 668-680.
doi: 10.2319/032315-186.1 pmid: 26528732 |
[25] | Al Maaitah EF, Alomari S, Al-Khateeb SN, et al. Cranial base measurements in different anteroposterior skeletal relationships using Bjork-Jarabak analysis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022, 92(5): 613-618. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||